Skip to main content

Quantitative Interpretation of Mammograms Based on a Physical Model of the Image Formation Process

  • Chapter
Digital Mammography

Part of the book series: Computational Imaging and Vision ((CIVI,volume 13))

Abstract

The analysis of a mammography is perturbed by two kinds of degradations : a blur induced by X-rays scattering and a loss of contrast due to beam hardening. Some restorations methods have been proposed for scattering correction [1],[2],[3],[4]. They are based on the low frequency aspect of the scattering map, which is then modeled as a convolution of the observed radiograph. The main issue is the filter determination, which is generally obtained by acquisition of adapted phantoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shaikh Naimuddin, Bruce Hasegawa and Charles A. Mistretta, “Scatter-glare correction using a convolution algorithm with variable weighting”, Medical Physics, vol. 14, no3, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. David G. Kruger, Frank Zink, Walter W. Peppier, David L. Ergun and Charles A. Mistretta, “A regional convolution kernel algorithm for scatter correction in dual-energy images: comparison to Single-kernel algorithms”, Medical Physics, vol. 21, no2, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carey E. Floyd, Peter T. Beatty and Carl E. Ravin, “Scatter compensation in digital chest radiography using Fourier deconvolution”, Investiture Radiology, vol. 24, no1, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.A. Seibert, J.M. Boone, “X-Ray scatter removal by deconvolution”, Medical Physics, vol. 15, no4, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.P. Highnam, J.M. Brady and B.J. Shepstone, “Computing The Scatter Component Of Mammographic Images”, IEEE Transactions On Medical Imaging, vol. 13, no2, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Retraint and J.M. Dinten, “Beam hardening and scattering correction for a quantitative X-ray inspection of fuel rod welds”, Proceedings of QNDE’96, Brunswick, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Retraint, J.M Dinten, R. Campagnolo, F. Peyrin, “Quantitative X-Ray Inspection”, Proceedings of QNDE’97, San Diego, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Darboux, J.M. Dinten, “Physical model-based scatter correction in mammography”, SPIE’s internationnal Symposium in Medical Imaging, Medical Physics, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dinten, J.M., Volle, J.M., Darboux, M. (1998). Quantitative Interpretation of Mammograms Based on a Physical Model of the Image Formation Process. In: Karssemeijer, N., Thijssen, M., Hendriks, J., van Erning, L. (eds) Digital Mammography. Computational Imaging and Vision, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6234-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5318-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics