Skip to main content

Generating Triples Based on Dependency Parsing for Contradiction Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Social Media Processing (SMP 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 568))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Contradiction detection is a task to detect the contradictory relation between two texts. In the social media, the phenomenon of contradictory descriptions of the same event is common and harmful. It is urgent to detect contradictory texts. Previous methods on detecting contradiction are mostly deriving features from shallow semantic representations like predicate-argument structures. They meet a problem of the low coverage of contradiction. We propose a joint method to extract more contradiction pairs. We utilize dependency parsing tree to generate tripes (dp-triple) which represent semantic information of the text. The dp-triple extraction method extract more contradiction pairs than present shallow semantic extraction methods like open IE or SRL. Due to the coverage limitation of triples, we also derive features from the context of the matching words between texts as backup. We demonstrate the joint method is effective in detecting contradiction. In predicting stage, we use a unsupervised method to detect contradiction relation and achieve a better performance than the state of the art method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use “Semantic Role Labeler” from UIUC http://cogcomp.cs.illinois.edu/demo/srl/?id=14.

  2. 2.

    ReVerb is available online on http://reverb.cs.washington.edu/.

References

  1. Bentivogli, L., Dagan, I., Dang, H.T., Giampiccolo, D., Magnini, B.: The fifth pascal recognizing textual entailment challenge. Proc. TAC 9, 14–24 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, P., Harrison, P.: Recognizing textual entailment with logical inference. In: Text Analysis Conference (TAC 2008) Workshop-RTE-4 Track, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Citeseer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Condoravdi, C., Crouch, D., De Paiva, V., Stolle, R., Bobrow, D.G.: Entailment, intensionality and text understanding. In: Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop on Text Meaning, vol. 9, pp. 38–45. Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dagan, I., Dolan, B., Magnini, B., Roth, D.: Recognizing textual entailment: Rational, evaluation and approaches-erratum. Nat. Lang. Eng. 16(01), 105–105 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dagan, I., Glickman, O., Magnini, B.: The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge. In: Quiñonero-Candela, J., Dagan, I., Magnini, B., d’Alché-Buc, F. (eds.) MLCW 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3944, pp. 177–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Marneffe, M.C., Rafferty, A.N., Manning, C.D.: Finding contradictions in text. ACL 8, 1039–1047 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giampiccolo, D., Dang, H.T., Magnini, B., Dagan, I., Cabrio, E., Dolan, B.: The fourth pascal recognizing textual entailment challenge. In: Proceedings of the First Text Analysis Conference (TAC 2008). Citeseer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giampiccolo, D., Magnini, B., Dagan, I., Dolan, B.: The third pascal recognizing textual entailment challenge. In: Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pp. 1–9. Association for Computational Linguistics (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harabagiu, S., Hickl, A., Lacatusu, F.: Negation, contrast and contradiction in text processing. AAAI 6, 755–762 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hashimoto, C., Torisawa, K., De Saeger, S., Oh, J.H., Kazama, J.: Excitatory or inhibitory: a new semantic orientation extracts contradiction and causality from the web. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 619–630. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marelli, M., Bentivogli, L., Baroni, M., Bernardi, R., Menini, S., Zamparelli, R.: Semeval-2014 task 1: evaluation of compositional distributional semantic models on full sentences through semantic relatedness and textual entailment. SemEval-2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pham, M.Q.N., Nguyen, M.L., Shimazu, A.: Using shallow semantic parsing and relation extraction for finding contradiction in text (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ritter, A., Downey, D., Soderland, S., Etzioni, O.: It’s a contradiction–no, it’s not: a case study using functional relations. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 11–20. Association for Computational Linguistics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing Qin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, L., Qin, B., Liu, T. (2015). Generating Triples Based on Dependency Parsing for Contradiction Detection. In: Zhang, X., Sun, M., Wang, Z., Huang, X. (eds) Social Media Processing. SMP 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 568. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0080-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0080-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0079-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0080-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics