Skip to main content

An Improved Multi-objective Differential Evolution Algorithm for Active Power Dispatch in Power System with Wind Farms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2546 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 763))

Abstract

For the uncertainty of wind power and load, a reserve risk index is defined from minimum of load loss and maximum of utilizing wind power. Then, the index is introduced into optimizing for active power dispatch. Considering three indexes which consist of fuel cost, pollutant emission amount and the reserve risk index, a multi-objective optimization model for active power dispatch in power system with wind farms is established. For better solving model, an improved multi-objective differential evolution algorithm is proposed. This algorithm contains chaos initialization strategy, parameter adaptive strategy, dynamic non-dominated sorting strategy introduced to enhance the global searching ability. With the Pareto solution set, the entropy-based TOPSIS (technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution) is adopted to sort the optimal solution set for the final scheme. The results and data analysis demonstrates the model is reasonable and the algorithm is valuable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Soumitra, M., Aniruddha, B., Sunita, H.D.: Multi-objective economic emission load dispatch solution using gravitational search algorithm and considering wind power penetration. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 44(1), 282–292 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lamadrid, A.J., Shawhan, D.L., Murillo, S.C., et al.: Stochastically optimized, carbon-reducing dispatch of storage, generation, and loads. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30(2), 1064–1075 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, T.Y.: Optimal spinning reserve for a wind-thermal power system using EIPSO. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22(4), 1612–1621 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hetzer, J., Yu, D.C., Bhattarai, K.: An economic dispatch model incorporating wind power. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 23(2), 603–611 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Junli, W., Buhan, Z., Weisi, D.: Application of cost-CVaR model in determining optimal spinning reserve for wind power penetrated system. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 66(1), 110–115 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wei, Z., Yu, P., Hui, S.: Optimal wind-thermal coordination dispatch based on risk reserve constraints. Eur. Trans. Electr. Power 21(1), 740–756 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yasar, C., Ozyon, S.: Solution to scalarized environmental economic power dispatch problem by using genetic algorithm. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 38(1), 54–62 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo, C.X., Bai, Y.H., Zheng, X., et al.: Optimal generation dispatch with renewable energy embedded using multiple objectives. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 42(1), 440–447 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, F.H., Huang, G.H., Fan, Y.R., et al.: A nonlinear fractional programming approach for environmental-economic power dispatch. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 78(1), 463–469 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gang, Y., Tianyou, C., Xiaochuan, L.: Multiobjective production planning optimization using hybrid evolutionary algorithms for mineral processing. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 15(4), 487–514 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agareal, S., et al.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Elsayed, S.M., Sarker, R.A., Essam, D.L.: An improved self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm for optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 9(1), 89–99 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Robic, T., Filipic, B.: DEMO: differential evolution for multiobjective optimization. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 3410(1), 520–533 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Wei, Q., Jianhua, Z., Nian, L., et al.: Multi-objective optimal generation dispatch with consideration of operation risk. Proc. CSEE 32(22), 64–72 (2012). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shu, X., Ming, Z., Gengyin, L., et al.: On spinning reserve determination and power generation dispatch optimization for wind power integration systems. In: 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 22 July 2012, San Diego, CA, United states, pp. 1–8 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xia, S., Zhou, M., Li, Y.: A coordinated active power and reserve dispatch approach for wind power integrated power systems considering line security verification. Proc. CSEE 33(13), 18–26 (2013). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zifa, L., Jianhua, Z.: An improved differential evolution algorithm for economic dispatch of power systems. Proc. CSEE 28(10), 100–105 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Das, S., Abraham, A., Konar, A.: Automatic clustering using an improved differential evolution algorithm. IEEE Trans. Syst. Hum. 38(1), 218–237 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, L., Wang, T.G., Luo, Y.: Improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA)-II in multi-objective optimization studies of wind turbine blades. Appl. Math. Mech. 32(6), 739–748 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhihuan, L., Xianzhong, D.: Comparison and analysis of multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for reactive power optimization. Proc. CSEE 4(5), 57–65 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Olson, D.L.: Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models. Math. Comput. Model. 40(1), 721–727 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Jie, W., Jiasen, S., Liang, L., et al.: Determination of weights for ultimate cross efficiency using Shannon entropy. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(5), 5162–5165 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was sponsored in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51507100), and in part by Shanghai Sailing Program (No. 15YF1404600), and in part by the “Chen Guang” project supported by the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission and Shanghai Education Development Foundation (No. 14CG55).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaolin Ge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xia, S., Xu, Y., Ge, X. (2017). An Improved Multi-objective Differential Evolution Algorithm for Active Power Dispatch in Power System with Wind Farms. In: Li, K., Xue, Y., Cui, S., Niu, Q., Yang, Z., Luk, P. (eds) Advanced Computational Methods in Energy, Power, Electric Vehicles, and Their Integration. ICSEE LSMS 2017 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 763. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6364-0_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6364-0_65

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6363-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6364-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics