Skip to main content

Process Model Abstraction: Identifying Business Significant Activities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Technologies and Applications (INTAP 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 932))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1499 Accesses

Abstract

Abstract process model refers to a coarse-grained view of a process model. Recognizing the diverse usability of abstract models, a plethora of process model abstraction techniques have been proposed. However, these techniques treat process fragments as black box and replace the fragments for abstraction, without taking into consideration the semantics of activities. Consequently, the Business Significant Activities (BSA) inside the black box are also eliminated, which impedes the robustness of abstraction. To address that problem, in this paper, we have proposed an activity-based approach in which all BSAs, including the ones inside process fragments, are preserved. Specifically, we have employed a systematic and rigorous procedure to develop a benchmark collection of 960 process models. The collection includes 240 source process models and 720 process models abstracted at three levels of granularity. Subsequently, we have evaluated the effectiveness of eight activity-ranking techniques for identifying BSAs. The results show, there is no universal technique that achieve higher accuracy for all types of process models. However, in majority of the cases, Word Frequency, Word Co-occurrence and Label Centrality are the top performing techniques for identifying business significant activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dumas, M., la Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuss, E., Leopold, H., van der Aa, H., Stuckenschmidt, H., Reijers, H.A.: A probabilistic evaluation procedure for process model matching techniques. Data Knowl. Eng. (2018, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smirnov, S.: Business process model abstraction. Ph.D. thesis at Business Process Technology Group, Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smirnov, S., Reijers, H.A., Weske, M., Nugteren, T.: Business process model abstraction: a definition, catalog, and survey. Distrib. Parallel Databases 30(1), 63–99 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smirnov, S., Reijers, H.A., Weske, M., Nugteren, T.: Business process model abstraction: theory and practice, Technical report, No 35, Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Polyvyanyy, A., Smirnov, S., Weske, M.: On application of structural decomposition for process model abstraction. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Business Process and Services Computing, pp. 110–122, Leipzig, Germany (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. PMMC (2015). https://ai.wu.ac.at/emisa2015/contest.php. Accessed 8 June 2018

  8. Shahzad, K., Shareef, K., Ali, R.F., Nawab, R.M.A., Abid, A.: Generating process model collection with diverse label and structural features. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Innovative Computing Technology (INTECH 2016), pp. 644–649, Islamabad, Pakistan 2016

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rana, M., Shahzad, K., Nawab, R.M.A., Leopold, H., Babar, U.: A textual description based approach to process matching. In: Horkoff, J., Jeusfeld, Manfred A., Persson, A. (eds.) PoEM 2016. LNBIP, vol. 267, pp. 194–208. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48393-1_14

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zaheer, S., Shahzad, K., Nawab, R.M.: Comparing manual- and auto-generated textual descriptions of business process models. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Innovative Computing Technology (INTEC 2016), pp. 41–46, Islamabad, Pakistan (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferreira, R., et al.: Assessing sentence scoring techniques for extractive text summarization. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(14), 5755–5764 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khurram Shahzad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fatima, B., Shahzad, K. (2019). Process Model Abstraction: Identifying Business Significant Activities. In: Bajwa, I., Kamareddine, F., Costa, A. (eds) Intelligent Technologies and Applications. INTAP 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 932. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6052-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6052-7_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6051-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6052-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics