Skip to main content

An Automatable Approach for Triples to PROV-O Mapping

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Technologies and Applications (INTAP 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 932))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1501 Accesses

Abstract

This works presents a novel approach to generate PROV-O [3] automatically by using triples. Managing provenance manually is on greater risk of human error and tracing it, validating it and mapping is very complex and time-consuming process. So, in this work we develop a system which automatically generates OWL [4] and PROV-O [3]. In developed approach we import OWL [4] ontology built in protégé and parses this ontology by using OWL API in eclipse. Then identify the areas where provenance is needed and input the PROV-O [3] tags. Now embed PROV-O [3] tags in ontology, then verify consistency and get the PROV-O [3] output. We have effectively performed many experiments and evaluations on various Ontologies with the help of our proposed approach. Hence, in context of usability, correctness and time the results we can get are clearly show the effectiveness of our system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cardoso, J.: The semantic web vision: where are we? IEEE Intell. syst., 22(5) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Missier, P., Belhajjame, K., Cheney, J.: The W3C PROV family of specifications for modelling provenance metadata. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Extending Database Technology, pp. 773–776. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lebo, T., Sahoo, S., McGuinness, D., Belhajjame, K., Cheney, J.: PROV-O: the PROV ontology. W3C Recommendation, 30 April 2013. World Wide Web Consortium (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, X.H., Zhang, D.Q., Gu, T., Pung, H.K.: Ontology based context modeling and reasoning using OWL. In: Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, pp. 18–22. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Motik, B., et al.: OWL 2 web ontology language: structural specification and functional-style syntax. W3C Recommendation 27(65), 159 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Decker, S., et al.: The semantic web: the roles of XML and RDF. IEEE Internet comput. 4(5), 63–73 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao, H., Zhang, S., Zhao, J.: Research of using protege to build ontology. In: 2012 IEEE/ACIS 11th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), pp. 697–700. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Ontology learning for the semantic web. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16(2), 72–79 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Budinsky, F., Steinberg, D., Ellersick, R., Grose, T.J., Merks, E.: Eclipse Modeling Framework: A Developer’s Guide. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Deursen, D., Poppe, C., Martens, G., Mannens, E., Van de Walle, R.: XML to RDF conversion: a generic approach. In: Automated solutions for Cross Media Content and Multi-channel Distribution, AXMEDIS 2008, pp. 138–144. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bajwa, I.S., Lee, M.G., Bordbar, B.: SBVR business rules generation from natural language specification. In: AAAI Spring Symposium: AI for Business Agility, pp. 2–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Horridge, M., Bechhofer, S.: The OWL API: a Java API for working with OWL 2 ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on OWL: Experiences and Directions, vol. 529, pp. 49–58. CEUR-WS. org (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lange, C.F., Chaudron, M.R., Muskens, J.: In practice: UML software architecture and design description. IEEE Softw. 23(2), 40–46 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoekstra, R., Groth, P.: PROV-O-Viz - understanding the role of activities in provenance. In: Ludäscher, B., Plale, B. (eds.) IPAW 2014. LNCS, vol. 8628, pp. 215–220. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16462-5_18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayesha Mehmood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mehmood, A., Mehmood, A., Akhtar, B. (2019). An Automatable Approach for Triples to PROV-O Mapping. In: Bajwa, I., Kamareddine, F., Costa, A. (eds) Intelligent Technologies and Applications. INTAP 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 932. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6052-7_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6052-7_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6051-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6052-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics