Skip to main content

Enhancement of Class Separability for Polarimetric TerraSAR-X Data and Its Application to Crop Classification in Leizhou Peninsula, Southern China

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Geo-informatics in Sustainable Ecosystem and Society (GSES 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 980))

  • 840 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, an enhanced class separability is proposed for multi-look fully polarimetric SAR classification. Instead of measuring the Wishart distance between two classes directly, we apply the deorientation procedure to eliminate the fluctuation of polarization orientation angle, which is an extrinsic property of targets and might result in larger inner class distance. Then the Barnes-Holm decomposition is used to factorize the deorientationed coherency matrix into a pure target and a distributed target, and the enhanced class separability, which is proved strictly, is measured by the sum of two Wishart distances based on pure targets and distributed targets respectively. The effectiveness of the proposed measure is demonstrated with the TerraSAR X-band PolSAR data in crop classification, in Leizhou Peninsula, southern China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. An, W.T., Cui, Y., Yang, J.: Three-component model-based decomposition for polarimetric SAR data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 48(6), 2732–2739 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cao, F., Hong, W., Wu, Y.R., Pottier, E.: An unsupervised segmentation with an adaptive number of clusters using the SPAN/H/α/A space and the complex wishart clustering for fully polarimetric SAR data analysis. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 45(11), 3454–3467 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferro-Famil, L., Pottier, E., Lee, J.S.: Unsupervised classification of multifrequency and fully polarimetric SAR images based on the H/A/Alpha- Wishart classifier. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. 39(11), 2332–2342 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kong, J.A., Swartz, A.A., Yueh, H.A., Novak, L.M., Shin, R.T.: Identification of terrain cover using the optimum polarimetric classifier. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2(2), 171–194 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, J.S., Ainsworth, T.L.: The effect of orientation angle compensation on coherency matrix and polarimetric target decompositions. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 49(1), 53–64 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, J.S., Grunes, M.R.: Classification of multi-look polarimetric SAR data based on complex Wishart distribution. Int. J. Remote Sens. 15(11), 2299–2311 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, J.S., Grunes, M.R., Ainsworth, T.L., Du, L.J., Schuler, D.L., Cloude, S.R.: Unsupervised classification using polarimetric decomposition and the complex Wishart classifier. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 37(5), 2249–2258 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, J.S., Grunes, M.R., Pottier, E., Ferro-Famil, L.: Unsupervised terrain classification preserving polarimetric scattering characteristics. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 42(4), 722–731 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnes, R.M., Holm, W.A.: On radar polarization mixed target state decomposition techniques. In: IEEE National Proceedings of the Radar Conference, Ann Arbor, MI, 20–21 April 1988

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, J.S., Schuler, D.L., Ainsworth, T.L.: Polarimetric SAR data compensation for terrain azimuth slope variation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 38(5), 2153–2163 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, Y.T., Ainsworth, T.L., Lee, J.S.: Estimation of the orientation and shape parameters of canopy scatterers from POLSAR observations. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 5(3), 835–847 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman, A., Durden, S.L.: A three component scattering model for polarimetric SAR data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 36(3), 963–973 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was funded by the Fundamental Research Foundation of Shenzhen Technology and Innovation Council (JCYJ20170818155853672, JCYJ20160429191127529), Natural science foundation of China project 41771403, research project from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA05050107-03, XDA19030301), and the Agricultural Scientific Research Outstanding Talent Fund, Agricultural Information Technology Key Laboratory Opening Fund of Ministry of Agriculture (2016006). We wish to take this opportunity to express their sincere acknowledgment to them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongzhong Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Conjecture: Let \( {\mathbf{T}}_{\mu } \) and \( {\mathbf{T}}_{\nu } \) be the coherency matrix centers of two classes \( \left\{ \mu \right\} \) and \( \left\{ \nu \right\} \), respectively. Based on Barnes-Holm decomposition, \( \left\{ \mu \right\} \) and \( \left\{ \nu \right\} \) are expressed as \( \left\{ {\mu_{0} } \right\} + \left\{ {\mu_{N} } \right\} \), \( \left\{ {\nu_{0} } \right\} + \left\{ {\nu_{N} } \right\} \). Whether

$$ d\left( {\mu ,\nu } \right) \le d\left( {\mu_{0} ,\nu_{0} } \right) + d\left( {\mu_{N} ,\nu_{N} } \right) $$
(9)

Proof:

For an arbitrary sample \( z \in \left\{ \mu \right\} \) with coherency matrix \( {\mathbf{Z}} \), based on Barnes-Holm decomposition, \( z \) is expressed as \( z_{0} + z_{N} \), with coherency matrix \( {\mathbf{Z}} = {\mathbf{Z}}_{0} + {\mathbf{Z}}_{N} \). According to Probability theory,

$$ \left( {z_{0} \in \left\{ {\nu_{0} } \right\}} \right) \cup \left( {z_{N} \in \left\{ {\nu_{N} } \right\}} \right) \subseteq \left( {z \in \left\{ \nu \right\}} \right) $$
(10)

which means that on the assumption of \( z_{0} \) belongs to the class \( \left\{ {\nu_{0} } \right\} \) and \( z_{N} \) belongs to the class \( \left\{ {\nu_{N} } \right\} \), it can be deduced that \( z \) belongs to the class \( \left\{ \nu \right\} \). In probability inequality, (10) can be expressed as

$$ p\left( {z_{0} \in \left\{ {\nu_{0} } \right\}} \right) \cdot p\left( {z_{N} \in \left\{ {\nu_{N} } \right\}} \right) \le p\left( {z \in \left\{ \nu \right\}} \right) $$
(11)

and thus

$$ p\left( {z_{0} |\nu_{0} } \right)P(\nu_{0} )*p\left( {z_{N} |\nu_{N} } \right)P(\nu_{N} ) \le p\left( {z|\nu } \right)P(\nu ) $$
(12)

where \( P(\nu ) \) is the priori probability of class \( \left\{ \nu \right\} \).

For classes \( \left\{ \nu \right\} \), \( \left\{ {\nu_{0} } \right\} \), \( \left\{ {\nu_{N} } \right\} \), their probability density functions follow Wishart distribution. According to the distance measure derived by Lee et al. [7], by taking the natural logarithm of (12) and changing its sign, we have

$$ d\left( {z_{0} ,\nu_{0} } \right) + d\left( {z_{N} ,\nu_{N} } \right) \ge d\left( {z,\nu } \right) $$
(13)

The average Wishart distance from class \( \left\{ \mu \right\} \) to center of class \( \left\{ \nu \right\} \) can be evaluated as

$$ d(\mu \left| \nu \right.) = \frac{1}{{N_{\mu } }}\sum\limits_{{z \in \left\{ \mu \right\}}} {d(z,\nu )} $$
(14)

where \( N_{\mu } \) is the sample number of class \( \left\{ \mu \right\} \). Combining Eqs. (13) and (14), we have

$$ d(\mu_{0} |\nu_{0} ) + d(\mu_{N} |\nu_{N} ) \ge d(\mu |\nu ) $$
(15)

and vice versa, that

$$ d(\nu_{0} |\mu_{0} ) + d(\nu_{N} |\mu_{N} ) \ge d(\nu |\mu ) $$
(16)

By substituting Eqs. (15) and (16) into

$$ d(\mu ,\nu ) = d(\mu |\nu ) + d(\nu |\mu ) $$
(17)

the proof of Eq. (9) is completed.

Equation (1) is a simplified expression by deleting the constant terms and it is assumed that \( n > > q \), so it can be concluded that the Wishart distance based on Barnes-Holm decomposition enhance class separability in relative terms, as well as in absolute terms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, H., Han, Y., Chen, J., Guo, S. (2019). Enhancement of Class Separability for Polarimetric TerraSAR-X Data and Its Application to Crop Classification in Leizhou Peninsula, Southern China. In: Xie, Y., Zhang, A., Liu, H., Feng, L. (eds) Geo-informatics in Sustainable Ecosystem and Society. GSES 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 980. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7025-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7025-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7024-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7025-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics