Skip to main content

Improving Taxonomy of Errors in Chat-Oriented Dialogue Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
9th International Workshop on Spoken Dialogue System Technology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 579))

Abstract

In previous studies, top-down and bottom-up approaches have been proposed for creating taxonomies of errors in chat-oriented dialogue systems. However, the reported \(\kappa \) (kappa) value for the taxonomy based on the top-down approach is low at 0.239, and no evaluation has been conducted for that based on the bottom-up approach. In this paper, we propose to revise these taxonomies to achieve better inter-annotator agreement. The revised taxonomy based on the bottom-up approach yielded a reasonable \(\kappa \) of 0.44 (Fleiss’ \(\kappa \)), suggesting that this taxonomy can be used reliably to classify errors in chat-oriented dialogue systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.lancers.jp/.

References

  1. Banchs RE, Li H (2012) IRIS: a chat-oriented dialogue system based on the vector space model. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2012 System Demonstrations, pp 37–42

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernsen NO, Dybkjær H, Dybkjær L (1996) Principles for the design of cooperative spoken human-machine dialogue. In: Proceedings of the ICSLP, vol 2, pp 729–732

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bohus D, Rudnicky AI (2005) Sorry, i didn’t catch that!–an investigation of non-understanding errors and recovery strategies. In: Proceedings of the SIGDIAL, pp 128–143

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark HH (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dybkjær L, Bernsen NO, Dybkjær H (1996) Grice incorporated: cooperativity in spoken dialogue. In: Proceedings of the COLING, vol 1, pp 328–333

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan J (eds) Syntax and semantics 3: speech acts. Academic Press, New York, pp 41–58

    Google Scholar 

  7. Higashinaka R, Funakoshi K, Araki M, Tsukahara H, Kobayashi Y, Mizukami M (2015) Towards taxonomy of errors in chat-oriented dialogue systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGDIAL, pp 87–95

    Google Scholar 

  8. Higashinaka R, Funakoshi K, Kobayashi Y, Inaba M (2016) The dialogue breakdown detection challenge: Task description, datasets, and evaluation metrics. In: Proceedings of the LREC, pp 3146–3150

    Google Scholar 

  9. Higashinaka R, Imamura K, Meguro T, Miyazaki C, Kobayashi N, Sugiyama H, Hirano T, Makino T, Matsuo Y (2014) Towards an open-domain conversational system fully based on natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the COLING, pp 928–939

    Google Scholar 

  10. Higashinaka R, Mizukami M, Funakoshi K, Araki M, Tsukahara H, Kobayashi Y (2015) Fatal or not? finding errors that lead to dialogue breakdowns in chat-oriented dialogue systems. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP, pp 2243–2248

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martinovsky B, Traum D (2003) The error is the clue: breakdown in human-machine interaction. In: Proceedings of the ISCA Workshop on Error Handling in Spoken Dialogue Systems, pp 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  12. Möller S, Engelbrecht KP, Oulasvirta A (2007) Analysis of communication failures for spoken dialogue systems. In: Proceedings of the INTERSPEECH, pp 134–137

    Google Scholar 

  13. Onishi K, Yoshimura T (2014) Casual conversation technology achieving natural dialog with computers. NTT DOCOMO Tech J 15(4):16–21

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paek T (2003) Toward a taxonomy of communication errors. In: Proceedings of the ISCA Workshop on Error Handling in Spoken Dialogue Systems, pp 53–58

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ritter A, Cherry C, Dolan WB (2011) Data-driven response generation in social media. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP, pp 583–593. Association for Computational Linguistics

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tsukahara H, Uchiumi K (2015) System utterance generation by label propagation over association graph of words and utterance patterns for open-domain dialogue systems. In: Proceedings of the PACLIC, pp 323–331

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vinyals O, Le Q (2015) A neural conversational model. arXiv:1506.05869

  18. Wallace RS (2009) The anatomy of alice. In: Parsing the turing test. Springer, Berlin, pp 181–210

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryuichiro Higashinaka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Higashinaka, R., Araki, M., Tsukahara, H., Mizukami, M. (2019). Improving Taxonomy of Errors in Chat-Oriented Dialogue Systems. In: D'Haro, L., Banchs, R., Li, H. (eds) 9th International Workshop on Spoken Dialogue System Technology. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 579. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9443-0_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics