Skip to main content

Multi-level Evaluation of Smart City Initiatives Using the SUMO Ontology and Choquet Integral

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Centred Intelligent Systems

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 189))

Abstract

Smart city initiatives from different administrative levels have varying perspectives. Evaluating initiatives in isolated administrative levels limits understanding of the systemic implications of initiatives on policy analysis and development. This paper focuses on the use of natural language processing and knowledge elicitation techniques as the means to evaluate smart city initiatives at various administrative levels including multinational, national, and local city levels. By building ontological knowledge maps, study evaluates alignment of multi-level smart city initiatives which ultimately supports smart city governance and policy analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Angeli, G., Premkumar, M.J., Manning C.: Leveraging linguistic structure for open domain information extraction. In: Proceedings of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angelidou, M.: Smart city policies: a spatial approach. Cities 41, S3–S11 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aspell 0.60.8 released. GNU Aspell Website. Kevin Atkinson. Accessed 22 November 2019

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barb, A.: Technical debt elicitation in text using natural language processing techniques. In: SERP 2016, Las Vegas, July 25–28, 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bellini, P., Benigni, M., Billero, R., Nesi, P., Rauch, N.: Km4City ontology building vs data harvesting and cleaning for smart-city services. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 25, 827–839 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dingare, D., Finkel, J., Nissim, M., Manning, C., Grover, G.: A system for identifying named entities in biomedical text: how results from two evaluations reflect on both the system and the evaluations. In: The 2004 BioLink Meeting: Linking Literature, Information and Knowledge for Biology at ISMB (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Miguel-Rodriguez, J., Galan-Paez, J., Aranda-Corral, G., Borrego-Diaz, J.: Reasoning as a bridge from data city towards smart city. In: IEEE Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced and Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing and Communications, Cloud and Big Data Computing, Internet of People, and Smart World Congress, pp. 968–974 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eik, K.A.: United Smart Cities (USC)-United nations Partnership for SDGs Platform. United Nations, 26 October 2015 (2015). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/partnership/?p=10009

  9. Gabor, A., Premkumar, M.J., Manning, C.D.: Leveraging linguistic structure for open domain information extraction. In: Proceedings of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. In: Gomez-Perez, V., Benjamins, V. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, vol. 2473, pp. 166–181. Springer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gruber, T.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5, 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kojadinovic, I., Marichal, J.-L., Roubens, M.: An axiomatic approach to the definition of the entropy of a discrete Choquet capacity. Inf. Sci. 172, 131–153 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kotlerman, L., Dagan, I., Szpektor, I., Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.: Directional distributional similarity for lexical inference. Nat. Lang. Eng. 16(4), 359–389 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Levin, B.: English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Magro, E., Wilson, J.R.: Complex innovation policy systems: towards an evaluation mix. Res. Policy 42, 1647–1656 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Manning, C.D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J.R., Bethard, S., McClosky, D.: The stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In: Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 55–60 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marichal, J.L.: An axiomatic approach of the discrete Choquet integral as a tool to aggregate interacting criteria. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 8, 800–807 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayangsari, L., Novani, S.: Multi-stakeholder co-creation analysis in smart city management: an experience from Bandung, Indonesia. Procedia Manuf. 4, 315–321 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, G.A., Fellbaum, C.: WordNet then and now. Lang. Resour. Eval. 41, 209–214 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller, B.: When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement. Synthese 190(7), 1293–1316 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. N-grams data: N-grams: based on 520 million word COCA corpus. United Nations, 15 October 2019 (2019). https://www.ngrams.info/intro.asp

  22. Office of Innovation and Technology: SmartCityPHL Roadmap. City Of Philadelphia, Publisher, Date Published in 04 February 2019 (2019). https://www.phila.gov/media/20190204121858/SmartCityPHL-Roadmap.pdf

  23. Pease, A., and Niles, I.: IEEE standard upper ontology: A Progress report knowledge engineering review: Special issue on ontologies and agents, Vol. 17, (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pease, A.: Ontology: A Practical Guide. Articulate Software Press, Angwin, CA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Qiu, J., Chai, Y., Liu, Y., Gu, Z., Li, S., Tian, Z.: Automatic non-taxonomic relation extraction from big data in smart city. IEEE Access 6, 74854–74864 (2018). Special Section on Collaboration for Internet of Things

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Reed, S.K.: A taxonomic analysis of abstraction. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11(6), 817–837 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rodick, D.W.: Process re-engineering and formal ontology: a deweyan perspective. Philos. Soc. Crit. 41(6), 557–576 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schvanevelt R.W.: Pathfinder Associative Networks: Studies in Knowledge Organization. Abl, Norwood, NJ (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smith, B.: Basic concepts of formal ontology. In: Guarino, N. (ed.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems, pp. 19–28. IOS Press, Beijing (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Trindade, E.P, Hinnig, M.P.F., Moreira da Costa, E., Marques, J.S., Bastos, R.C., Yigitcanlar, T.: Sustainable development of smart cities: a systematic review of the literature. J. Open Innov. Technol. Market Complex. 3(11) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary: FACT SHEET: Administration Announces New “Smart Cities” Initiative to Help Communities Tackle Local Challenges and Improve City Services. The white House–President Barack Obama, The White House, September 14, 2015 (2015). https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/09/14/fact-sheet-administration-announces-new-smart-cities-initiative-help

  32. Valaski, J., Malucelli, A., Reinehr, S.: Ontologies application in organizational learning: a literature review. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(8), 7555–7561 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Woelert, P.: Governing knowledge: the formalization dilemma in the governance of the public sciences. Minerva 53(1), 1–19 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nil Kilicay-Ergin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kilicay-Ergin, N., Barb, A. (2021). Multi-level Evaluation of Smart City Initiatives Using the SUMO Ontology and Choquet Integral. In: Zimmermann, A., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds) Human Centred Intelligent Systems. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 189. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5784-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics