Skip to main content

Utility of Neural Embeddings in Semantic Similarity of Text Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Evolution in Computational Intelligence

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1176))

Abstract

Semantic similarity plays an important role in understanding the context of text data. In this paper, semantic similarity between large text data is computed using different neural embeddings. we review the utility of different deep neural embeddings for text data representation. Most of the earlier papers have studied the semantic similarity of text by using individual word embeddings. In this paper, we have evaluated the neural embedding techniques on large text data with the help of Essay Dataset. We have used recent neural embedding methods such as Google Sentence Encoder, ELMo, and GloVe along with traditional similarity metrics including TF-IDF and Jaccard Index for experimental investigation. Experimental evaluation in this research paper shows that Google Sentence Encoder and ELMo embeddings perform best on semantic similarity task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cambria, E., White, B.: Jumping NLPp curves: a review of natural language processing research. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 9(2), 48–57 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cer, D., Yang, Y., Kong, S.Y., Hua, N., Limtiaco, N., John, R.S., Constant, N., Guajardo-Cespedes, M., Yuan, S., Tar, C., et al.: Universal Sentence Encoder. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.11175 (2018)

  3. Clark, E., Celikyilmaz, A., Smith, N.A.: Sentence movers similarity: automatic evaluation for multi-sentence texts. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 2748–2760 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khurana, D., Koli, A., Khatter, K., Singh, S.: Natural Language Processing: State of the Art, Current Trends and Challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.05148 (2017)

  5. Melamud, O., Goldberger, J., Dagan, I.: context2vec: Learning generic context embedding with bidirectional LSTM. In: Proceedings of The 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 51–61. Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany (2016). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/K16-1006

  6. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 (2013)

  7. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pawar, A., Mago, V.: Challenging the boundaries of unsupervised learning for semantic similarity. IEEE Access 7, 16291–16308 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.: Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peters, M.E., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., Zettlemoyer, L.: Deep contextualized word representations. In: Proceedings of NAACL (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prize, A.S.A.: The Hewlett Foundation: Automated Essay Scoring (2012). https://www.kaggle.com/c/asap-aes/

  12. Tashu, T.M., Horváth, T.: Pair-wise: automatic essay evaluation using word mover’s distance. CSEDU 1, 59–66 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, B., Wang, A., Chen, F., Wang, Y., Kuo, C.C.J.: Evaluating Word Embedding Models: Methods and Experimental Results. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.09785 (2019)

  14. Young, T., Hazarika, D., Poria, S., Cambria, E.: Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing. IEEE Comput Intell. Mag. 13(3), 55–75 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu, G., Iglesias, C.A.: Computing semantic similarity of concepts in knowledge graphs. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29(1), 72–85 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manik Hendre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hendre, M., Mukherjee, P., Godse, M. (2021). Utility of Neural Embeddings in Semantic Similarity of Text Data. In: Bhateja, V., Peng, SL., Satapathy, S.C., Zhang, YD. (eds) Evolution in Computational Intelligence. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1176. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5788-0_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics