Skip to main content

Neural Rasch Model: How Do Word Embeddings Adjust Word Difficulty?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Linguistics (PACLING 2019)

Abstract

The Rasch model is a probabilistic model for analyzing the psychological test response data such as second language tests; it is especially useful to automatically obtain a common scale of difficulty for various types of test questions by fitting the model to the response data of the test takers obtained from various methods such as reading comprehension questions and vocabulary questions. Because a test-taker can answer only some hundreds of vocabulary questions from tens of thousands of words in second language vocabulary, there exists a strong need to estimate the difficulty of the words that were not used during the test. For this purpose, the word frequency in a large corpus was previously used as a major clue. Although recent advancements in natural language processing enable us to obtain considerable semantic information about a word in the form of word embeddings, the manner in which such embeddings can be utilized while adjusting the word difficulty estimation has not been considerably investigated. Herein, we investigate how to effectively leverage word embeddings for adjusting the word difficulty estimates. We propose a novel neural model to fit the test response data. Further, we use the trained weights of our neural model to estimate the difficulty of the words that were not tested. The quantitative and qualitative experimental results denote that our model effectively leverages word embeddings to adjust simple frequency-based word difficulty estimates.

This work was supported by JST, ACT-I Grant Number JPMJPR18U8, Japan. We used the ABCI infrastructure by AIST for computational resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T., Koyama, M.: Optuna: a next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. In: Proceedings of KDD, pp. 2623–2631 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, F.B., Kim, S.H.: Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. BNC Consortium: The British National Corpus

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davies, M.: The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+): design, architecture, and linguistic insights. Int. J. Corpus Linguist. 14(2), 159–190 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ehara, Y.: Building an English vocabulary knowledge dataset of Japanese English-as-a-second-language learners using crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of LREC (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ehara, Y., Baba, Y., Utiyama, M., Sumita, E.: Assessing translation ability through vocabulary ability assessment. In: Proceedings of IJCAI, pp. 3712–3718 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ehara, Y., Miyao, Y., Oiwa, H., Sato, I., Nakagawa, H.: Formalizing word sampling for vocabulary prediction as graph-based active learning. In: Proceedings of EMNLP (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ehara, Y., Sato, I., Oiwa, H., Nakagawa, H.: Mining words in the minds of second language learners: learner-specific word difficulty. In: Proceedings of COLING (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ehara, Y., Shimizu, N., Ninomiya, T., Nakagawa, H.: Personalized reading support for second-language web documents. ACM TIST 4(2) (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2438653.2438666. Article No. 31

  10. Fan, R.E., Chang, K.W., Hsieh, C.J., Wang, X.R., Lin, C.J.: LIBLINEAR: a library for large linear classification. JMLR 9, 1871–1874 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ioffe, S., Szegedy, C.: Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In: Proceedings of ICML (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of NIPS, pp. 1097–1105 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Laufer, B.: What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension. In: Special Language: From Humans Thinking to Thinking Machines, pp. 316–323 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Laufer, B., Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G.C.: Lexical threshold revisited: lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Read. Foreign Lang. 22(1), 15–30 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, J., Yeung, C.Y.: Personalizing lexical simplification. In: Proceedings of COLING, August 2018

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meara, P.M., Alcoy, J.C.O.: Words as species: an alternative approach to estimating productive vocabulary size. Read. Foreign Lang. 22(1), 222–236 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nation, P.: How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Can. Mod. Lang. Rev. 63(1), 59–82 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Nation, P., Beglar, D.: A vocabulary size test. Lang. Teach. 31(7), 9–13 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paetzold, G., Specia, L.: Collecting and exploring everyday language for predicting psycholinguistic properties of words. In: Proceedings of COLING (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paszke, A., et al.: Automatic differentiation in PyTorch (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. JMLR 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.: GloVe: global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rasch, G.: Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Danish Institute for Educational Research, Copenhagen (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Řehůřek, R., Sojka, P.: Software framework for topic modelling with large corpora. In: Proceedings of LREC, pp. 45–50 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., Grabe, W.: The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. Mod. Lang. J. 95(1), 26–43 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. JMLR 15(1), 1929–1958 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Yeung, C.Y., Lee, J.: Personalized text retrieval for learners of Chinese as a foreign language. In: Proceedings of COLING, pp. 3448–3455 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yimam, S.M., et al.: A report on the complex word identification shared task 2018. In: Proceedings of BEA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yo Ehara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ehara, Y. (2020). Neural Rasch Model: How Do Word Embeddings Adjust Word Difficulty?. In: Nguyen, LM., Phan, XH., Hasida, K., Tojo, S. (eds) Computational Linguistics. PACLING 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1215. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6168-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6168-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6167-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6168-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics