Abstract
The Rasch model is a probabilistic model for analyzing the psychological test response data such as second language tests; it is especially useful to automatically obtain a common scale of difficulty for various types of test questions by fitting the model to the response data of the test takers obtained from various methods such as reading comprehension questions and vocabulary questions. Because a test-taker can answer only some hundreds of vocabulary questions from tens of thousands of words in second language vocabulary, there exists a strong need to estimate the difficulty of the words that were not used during the test. For this purpose, the word frequency in a large corpus was previously used as a major clue. Although recent advancements in natural language processing enable us to obtain considerable semantic information about a word in the form of word embeddings, the manner in which such embeddings can be utilized while adjusting the word difficulty estimation has not been considerably investigated. Herein, we investigate how to effectively leverage word embeddings for adjusting the word difficulty estimates. We propose a novel neural model to fit the test response data. Further, we use the trained weights of our neural model to estimate the difficulty of the words that were not tested. The quantitative and qualitative experimental results denote that our model effectively leverages word embeddings to adjust simple frequency-based word difficulty estimates.
This work was supported by JST, ACT-I Grant Number JPMJPR18U8, Japan. We used the ABCI infrastructure by AIST for computational resources.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T., Koyama, M.: Optuna: a next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. In: Proceedings of KDD, pp. 2623–2631 (2019)
Baker, F.B., Kim, S.H.: Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York (2004)
BNC Consortium: The British National Corpus
Davies, M.: The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+): design, architecture, and linguistic insights. Int. J. Corpus Linguist. 14(2), 159–190 (2009)
Ehara, Y.: Building an English vocabulary knowledge dataset of Japanese English-as-a-second-language learners using crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of LREC (2018)
Ehara, Y., Baba, Y., Utiyama, M., Sumita, E.: Assessing translation ability through vocabulary ability assessment. In: Proceedings of IJCAI, pp. 3712–3718 (2016)
Ehara, Y., Miyao, Y., Oiwa, H., Sato, I., Nakagawa, H.: Formalizing word sampling for vocabulary prediction as graph-based active learning. In: Proceedings of EMNLP (2014)
Ehara, Y., Sato, I., Oiwa, H., Nakagawa, H.: Mining words in the minds of second language learners: learner-specific word difficulty. In: Proceedings of COLING (2012)
Ehara, Y., Shimizu, N., Ninomiya, T., Nakagawa, H.: Personalized reading support for second-language web documents. ACM TIST 4(2) (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2438653.2438666. Article No. 31
Fan, R.E., Chang, K.W., Hsieh, C.J., Wang, X.R., Lin, C.J.: LIBLINEAR: a library for large linear classification. JMLR 9, 1871–1874 (2008)
Ioffe, S., Szegedy, C.: Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In: Proceedings of ICML (2015)
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of NIPS, pp. 1097–1105 (2012)
Laufer, B.: What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension. In: Special Language: From Humans Thinking to Thinking Machines, pp. 316–323 (1989)
Laufer, B., Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G.C.: Lexical threshold revisited: lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Read. Foreign Lang. 22(1), 15–30 (2010)
Lee, J., Yeung, C.Y.: Personalizing lexical simplification. In: Proceedings of COLING, August 2018
Meara, P.M., Alcoy, J.C.O.: Words as species: an alternative approach to estimating productive vocabulary size. Read. Foreign Lang. 22(1), 222–236 (2010)
Nation, P.: How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Can. Mod. Lang. Rev. 63(1), 59–82 (2006)
Nation, P., Beglar, D.: A vocabulary size test. Lang. Teach. 31(7), 9–13 (2007)
Paetzold, G., Specia, L.: Collecting and exploring everyday language for predicting psycholinguistic properties of words. In: Proceedings of COLING (2016)
Paszke, A., et al.: Automatic differentiation in PyTorch (2017)
Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. JMLR 12, 2825–2830 (2011)
Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.: GloVe: global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 1532–1543 (2014)
Rasch, G.: Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Danish Institute for Educational Research, Copenhagen (1960)
Řehůřek, R., Sojka, P.: Software framework for topic modelling with large corpora. In: Proceedings of LREC, pp. 45–50 (2010)
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., Grabe, W.: The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. Mod. Lang. J. 95(1), 26–43 (2011)
Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. JMLR 15(1), 1929–1958 (2014)
Yeung, C.Y., Lee, J.: Personalized text retrieval for learners of Chinese as a foreign language. In: Proceedings of COLING, pp. 3448–3455 (2018)
Yimam, S.M., et al.: A report on the complex word identification shared task 2018. In: Proceedings of BEA (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ehara, Y. (2020). Neural Rasch Model: How Do Word Embeddings Adjust Word Difficulty?. In: Nguyen, LM., Phan, XH., Hasida, K., Tojo, S. (eds) Computational Linguistics. PACLING 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1215. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6168-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6168-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6167-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6168-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)