Skip to main content

Increase the Quality of Treatment with Medical Apps Through Remote Compliance Testing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1154 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 235))

Abstract

Medical Apps are increasingly gaining in importance. But comprehensive testing of the app is difficult and there is no single method. For example, compliance has been ignored so far in most cases. A general remote method has been developed to test the compliance behavior when using medical apps, as well as to take them into account in later treatment. With the help of timestamps at appropriate locations, frequency, times and periods of use can be measured and (automatically) compared with predefined values. Furthermore, this method provides information about the efficiency and the learning phase of the users, as well as the usability, which is of great importance for the evaluation of compliance. With the help of different smartphone sensors, it is possible to evaluate the data quality. By taking other factors into consideration, such as the quality of experience and external circumstances, as well as the determination of data quality, the medical app can be evaluated comprehensively. This allows user profiles to be created . This resulting information can be entered into the treatment and the quality of the treatment can be increased .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Albrecht U-V (2016) Chances and risks of mobile health apps (CHARISMHA). Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover. urn:nbn:de:gbv:084-16040811153

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Van Royan P, Denekens J (2001) Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive. J Clin Pharm Ther 26:331–342. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2710.2001.00363.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization (2003) Adherence to long-term therapies—evidence for action

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sauer J, Muenzberg A, Hein, Roesch N (2019) Simplify testing of mobile medical applications by using timestamps for remote, automated evaluation. In: 2019 international conference on wireless and mobile computing, networking and communications (WiMob), pp 203–206. https://doi.org/10.1109/WiMOB.2019.8923241

  5. Sauer J, Muenzberg A, Siewert L, Hein, Roesch N (2020) Remote testing of usability in medical apps. In: 8th EAI international conference, MobiHealth 2019, Dublin, Ireland, 14–15 Nov 2019, Proceedings, pp 3–17. ISSN 1867-8211

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tullis T, Albert B (2008) Measuring the user experience. Elsevier, Burlington, United States, pp 87–97/183–189

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patwardhan M (2016) Assessing the impact of usability design features of an mHealth App on clinical protocol compliance using a mixed methods approach. Arizona State University, Tempe

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brooke (1986) SUS—a quick and dirty usability scale, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  9. McCurdie T, Taneva S, Casselman M, Yeung M, McDaniel C, Ho W, Cafazzo J (2012) mHealth consumer apps: the case for user-centered design. Biomed Instrum Technol 46(s2):49–56. https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-46.s2.49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hogan TP, Awad AG, Eastwood R (1983) A self-report scale predictive of drug compliance in schizophrenics: reliability and discriminative validity. Psychol Med. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700050182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolpe J (1969) The practice of behavior therapy. Pergamon Press, New York. ISBN 0080065635

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stallman H (2010) Psychological distress in university students: a comparison with general population data. Aust Psychol 45(4):286–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Debeuf T, Verbeken S, Van Beveren M-L, Michels N, Braet C (2018) Stress and eating behaviour: a daily diary study in youngsters. Front Psychol 9(2657)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paula Amaral A, João Soares M, Margarida Pinto A, Telma Pereira A, Madeira N, Carvalho Bos S, Marques M, Roque C, Macedo A (2018) Sleep difficulties in college students: the role of stress, affect and cognitive processes. Psychiatry Res 260:331–337

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vaez M, Laflamme L (2008) Experienced stress, psychological symptoms, self-rated health and academic achievement: a longitudinal student of Swedish university students. Soc Behav Pers 36(2):183–196

    Google Scholar 

  16. Patel V, Flisher A, Hetrick S, McGorry P (2007) Mental health of young people: a global public-health challenge. Lancet 369(9569):1302–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janina Sauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sauer, J., Muenzberg, A., Reisewitz, F., Hein, A., Roesch, N. (2022). Increase the Quality of Treatment with Medical Apps Through Remote Compliance Testing. In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 235. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2377-6_87

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics