Skip to main content

Potentials of Digital Business Models in the Construction Industry—Empirical Results from German Experts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 236))

  • 1062 Accesses

Abstract

Digitization and new business models in the construction industry gain increasing relevance. Therefore, an empirical study was carried out in Germany, Austria and Switzerland based on a theoretical foundation. The target of this study is to examine to what extent digitization has already changed the construction industry, what will change in the future, and what are possible benefits of new digital business models. The structural equation model (SEM) approach identifies four key constructs (KPI, individualization, efficiency, communication) that could have an impact on the potentials of digital business models (PDBM) and their processes in the construction industry. Of those four hypotheses two (efficiency and communication) have a significant impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bauer L, Boksberger P, Herget J (2008) The virtual dimension in tourism: criteria catalogue for the assessment of Etourism applications. In O’Connor P, Höpken W, Gretzel U (eds) Information and Communication technologies in Tourism: Proceedings of the International Conference in Innsbruck 2008, pp 522–532. Springer, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baumanns T, Freber P, Schober K, Kirchner F (2017) https://www.rolandberger.com/publications/publication_pdf/roland_berger_hvb_studie_bauwirtschaft_20160415_1_.pdf

  3. Hautala K, Järvenpää M, Pulkkinen P (2017) https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1472605

  4. Business Dictionary (2017) http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/digitization.html

  5. Härting R, Reichstein C, Haarhoff R, Härtle N, Stiefl J (2019) Driver to gain from digitization in the tourism industry. Proce ICICT 3:293–306

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schmidt R, Möhring M, Härting R, Reichstein C, Neumaier P, Jozinović J (2015) Industry 4.0—potentials for creating smart products: empirical research results. In Abramowicz W, Kokkinaki A (eds) 18th international conference on business information systems. Lecture notes in business information processing, vol 208, pp 16–27. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  7. Breuer P, Forina L, Moulton J (2017) http://cmsoforum.mckinsey.com/article/beyond-the-hype-capturing-value-from-big-data-and-advanced-analytics

  8. Schmidt R, Möhring M, Maier S, Pietsch J, Härting R (2014) Big data as strategic enabler—insights from Central European enterprises. In: Abramowicz W, Kokkinaki A (eds) 17th international conference on business information systems. Lecture notes in business information processing. Springer, New York, pp 50–60

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper DR, Schindler PS, Sun J (2006) Business research methods. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gretzel U, Yuan Y-L, Fesenmaier DR (2000) Preparing for the new economy: advertising strategies and change in destination marketing organizations. J Travel Res 39:146–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barua A, Prabhudev P, Whinston A, Yin F (2004) An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value. Manage Inf Syst Q 28(4):585–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bauer W, Herkommer O, Schlund S (2015) Die Digitalisierung der Wertschöpfung kommt in deutschen Unternehmen an. https://www.hanser-elibrary.com/doi/10.3139/104.111273

  13. Härting R, Reichstein C, Schad M (2018) Potentials of digital business models—empirical investigation of data driven impacts in industry. Procedia Comput Sci 126:1495–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaim R, Härting R, Reichstein C (2019) Benefits of agile project management in an environment of increasing complexity—a transaction cost analysis. In: Proceedings KES IDT. Springer, New York, pp 195–204

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fraunhofer INT (2014) Das Fraunhofer-Institut für Naturwissenschaftlich-Technische Trendanalysen berichtet über neue Technologien: Big Data, March 2014, p 87

    Google Scholar 

  16. Abbasi A, Sarker S, Roger HL, Chiang S (2016) Big data research in information systems: toward an inclusive research agenda. J Assoc Inf Syst 17(2):2

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clauß T, Laufien SM (2017) Digitale Geschäftsmodelle: Systematisierung und Gestaltungsoptionen. WiSt – Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium 10:6

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gholami R, Watson RT, Hasan H, Molla A, Andersen NB (2016) Information systems solutions for environmental sustainability: how can we do more? J Assoc Inf Syst 17(7):526

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fast-Berglund Â, Harlin U, Âkerman M (2015) Digitization of meetings—from white-boards to smart-boards. Procedia CIRP 41:1125–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Obermeier R (2017) Industrie 4.0 als unternehmerische Gestaltungsaufgabe: Strategische und operative Handlungsfelder für Industriebetriebe - Betriebswirtschaftliche, technische und rechtliche Herausforderungen. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chi M, Li YZ (2016) Digital business strategy and firm performance: the mediation effects of E-collaboration capability. J (JAIS) 86

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rea LM, Parker RA (2014) Designing and conducting survey research: a comprehensive guide. Wiley, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  23. Projectteam TL (2017) https://www.limesurvey.org/de/

  24. Wong KKK (2013) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Mark Bull 24(1):1–32

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res 18:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Markus KA (2012) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling by Rex B. Kline. Struct Equ Model Multidisciplinary J 19(3):509–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods Bus Res 295(2):295–336

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ringle C, Wende S, Will A (2017) www.smartpls.de

  29. Ringle C, Sarstedt M, Straub D (2012) A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. MIS Q 36(1):iii–xiv

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Manage Sci 49(10):1407–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Thinh Nguyen and Felix Häfner. We would like to take this opportunity to thank you very much for your great support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf-Christian Härting .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Härting, RC., Reichstein, C., Schüle, T. (2022). Potentials of Digital Business Models in the Construction Industry—Empirical Results from German Experts. In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 236. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2380-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics