Skip to main content

A Novel Complex Pignistic Belief Transform for Conflict Measure in Complex Evidence Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Mining and Big Data (DMBD 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1453))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 772 Accesses

Abstract

Information fusion has received extensive attention in the past decades, in which the handing of uncertain information is still an open issue. Complex evidence theory (CET) can effectively deal with uncertain information. However, in CET, the measurement of conflict is still a problem to be solved. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel method of measurement method for CET. Firstly, we divide the belief into power sets and propose a complex pignistic belief transform. Then the betting commitment function is designed. Finally, a new betting distance based on betting commitment function is proposed, and some properties of the betting distance are analyzed, including the non-negativeness, nondegeneracy, symmetry, and triangle inequality. The betting distance can be used to measure the conflict between CBBAs. In addition, an example is given to show the advantage of betting distance compared to the conflict coefficient.

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62003280).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Deng, J., Deng, Y.: Information volume of fuzzy membership function. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 16(1), 4106 (2021). https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2021.1.4106

  2. Meng, D., Li, Y., He, C., Guo, J., Lv, Z., Wu, P.: Multidisciplinary design for structural integrity using a collaborative optimization method based on adaptive surrogate modelling. Mater. Design 206, 109789 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lai, J.W., Chang, J., Ang, L., Cheong, K.H.: Multi-level information fusion to alleviate network congestion. Inf. Fusion 63, 248–255 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou, M., Liu, X.-B., Chen, Y.-W., Qian, X.-F., Yang, J.-B., Wu, J.: Assignment of attribute weights with belief distributions for MADM under uncertainties. Knowl.-Based Syst. 189, 105110 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fu, C., Xue, M., Chang, W., Xu, D., Yang, S.: An evidential reasoning approach based on risk attitude and criterion reliability. Knowl.-Based Syst. 199, 105947 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Z.-G. Liu, L.-Q. Huang, K. Zhou, T. Denoeux, Combination of transferable classification with multisource domain adaptation based on evidential reasoning, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, W., Cao, Y., Deng, X.: A novel Z-network model based on Bayesian network and Z-number. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 28(8), 1585–1599 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Babajanyan, S., Allahverdyan, A., Cheong, K.H.: Energy and entropy: Path from game theory to statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. Res. 2(4), 043055 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pan, L., Gao, X., Deng, Y., Cheong, K.H.: The constrained pythagorean fuzzy sets and its similarity measure. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deng, Y.: Uncertainty measure in evidence theory. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 63(11), 210201 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Xu, X., Zheng, J., Yang, J.-B., Xu, D.-L., Chen, Y.-W.: Data classification using evidence reasoning rule. Knowl.-Based Syst. 116, 144–151 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pan, L., Deng, Y.: An association coefficient of a belief function and its application in a target recognition system. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 35(1), 85–104 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao, J., Deng, Y.: Complex network modeling of evidence theory. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wen, T., Cheong, K.H.: The fractal dimension of complex networks: a review. Inf. Fusion 73, 87–102 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meng, D., Xie, T., Wu, P., Zhu, S.-P., Hu, Z., Li, Y.: Uncertainty-based design and optimization using first order saddle point approximation method for multidisciplinary engineering systems, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems. Part A: Civil Eng. 6(3), 04020028 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meng, D., Xie, T., Wu, P., He, C., Hu, Z., Lv, Z.: An uncertainty-based design optimization strategy with random and interval variables for multidisciplinary engineering systems. Structures 32, 997–1004 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meng, D., Hu, Z., Wu, Zhu, S.-P., Correia, J.A., De Jesus, A.M.: Reliability-based optimisation for offshore structures using saddlepoint approximation. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Maritime Engineering, vol. 173, pp. 33–42. Thomas Telford Ltd. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cheong, K.H., Koh, J.M., Jones, M.C.: Paradoxical survival: examining the parrondo effect across biology. BioEssays 41(6), 1900027 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lai, J.W., Cheong, K.H.: Parrondo effect in quantum coin-toss simulations. Phys. Rev. E 101, 052212 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, P., Zhang, X., Pedrycz, W.: A consensus model for hesitant fuzzy linguistic group decision-making in the framework of dempster-shafer evidence theory. Knowl.-Based Syst. 212, 106559 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deng, Y.: Information volume of mass function. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 15(6), 3983 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Song, Y., Zhu, J., Lei, L., Wang, X.: A self-adaptive combination method for temporal evidence based on negotiation strategy. Sci. China Inf. Sci. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-3045-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, Z., Liu, Y., Dezert, J., Cuzzolin, F.: Evidence combination based on credal belief redistribution for pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 28(4), 618–631 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiao, F.: Generalization of Dempster-Shafer theory: a complex mass function. Appl. Intell. 50(10), 3266–3275 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiao, F.: Generalized belief function in complex evidence theory. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 38(4), 3665–3673 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiao, F.: CEQD: a complex mass function to predict interference effects. IEEE Trans. Cybern. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.3040770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiao, F.: Complex pignistic transformation-based evidential distance for multisource information fusion of medical diagnosis in the IoT. Sensors 21(3), 840 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuyuan Xiao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhao, Y., Xiao, F. (2021). A Novel Complex Pignistic Belief Transform for Conflict Measure in Complex Evidence Theory. In: Tan, Y., Shi, Y., Zomaya, A., Yan, H., Cai, J. (eds) Data Mining and Big Data. DMBD 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1453. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7476-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7476-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7475-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7476-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics