Skip to main content

UMLS-Based Question-Answering Approach for Automatic Initial Frailty Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1741))

Abstract

Frailty is the most problematic multidimensional geriatric syndrome among elderly population that leads to poor quality of life and increased risk of death. Adverse effects include an increased risk of hospitalisation and institutionalisation, poorer outcomes of post-hospitalisation, and higher mortality rates. A questionnaire-based frailty assessment is an effective way to achieve early diagnosis of frailty. However, most of the existing frailty assessment tools require face-to-face consultation. For elderly patients living in rural areas are more likely to struggle to access healthcare than a patient living in an urban or suburban area, and they have higher chance of catching diseases due to frequent hospital visits as most of them are vulnerable due to being immunocompromised. An automatic initial frailty assessment approach can minimise the impact of mentioned disadvantages and save clinical resources by avoiding unnecessary manual assessments. The objective of this paper is to propose an automatic initial frailty assessment approach which can quickly identify potential patients that require further frailty assessment by using patient’s relevant clinical notes to answer Tillburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) questionnaire automatically. A phrase-based query expansion method is proposed to identify the most relevant phrases to the frailty assessment questionnaire based on UMLS ontology. The research shows the advantages of using UMLS based concepts as features in automatic initial frailty assessment using clinical notes. The research enables clinician to assess frailty automatically using medical data, reduces the frequency of face-to-face consultations and hospital visits, which is extremely beneficial during unusual or unexpected times such as COVID-19 pandemic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Clegg, A., Young, J., Iliffe, S., Rikkert, M.O., Rockwood, K.: Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 381(9868), 752–762 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Malmstrom, T.K., Miller, D.K., Morley, J.E.: A comparison of four frailty models. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 62(4), 721–726 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Gelder, J., et al.: Predicting adverse health outcomes in older emergency department patients: the APOP study. Neth. J. Med. 74(8), 342–352 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rockwood, K., et al.: A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 173(5), 489–495 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sternberg, S.A., Schwartz, A.W., Karunananthan, S., Bergman, H., Clarfield, M.: The identification of frailty: a systematic literature review. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 59(11), 2129–2138 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dent, E., Kowal, P., Hoogendijk, E.O.: Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: a review. Eur. J. Int. Med. 31, 3–10 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Newgard, C.D., Zive, D., Jui, J., Weathers, C., Daya, M.: Electronic versus manual data processing: evaluating the use of electronic health records in out-of-hospital clinical research. Acad. Emerg. Med. Off. J. Soc. Acad. Emerg. Med 19(2), 217–227 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pavlović, I., Kern, T., Miklavcic, D.: Comparison of paper-based and electronic data collection process in clinical trials: costs simulation study. Contemp. Clin. Trials 30(4), 300–316 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cao, Y., et al.: AskHERMES: an online question answering system for complex clinical questions. J. Biomed. Inform. 44(2), 277–288 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cairns, B.L., et al.: The MiPACQ clinical question answering system. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, pp. 171–180 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zahid, M., Mittal, A., Joshi, R.C., Atluri, G.: CliniQA: a machine intelligence based clinical question answering system. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.05927 (2018)

  12. Abacha, A.B., Zweigenbaum, P.: Means: a medical question-answering system combining NLP techniques and semantic web technologies. Inf. Process. Manag. 51(5), 570–594 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Amati, G.: BM25. In: Liu, L., Özsu, M.T. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Database Systems, pp. 257–260. Springer, Boston (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_921

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Gurulingappa, H., Toldo, L., Schepers, C., Bauer, A., Megaro, G.: Semi-supervised information retrieval system for clinical decision support. In: TREC (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goldberg, Y.: Neural network methods for natural language processing. Synth. Lect. Hum. Lang. Technol. 10(1), 1–309 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Robertson, S., Zaragoza, H.: The probabilistic relevance framework: BM25 and beyond. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 3, 333–389 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saleh, S., Pecina, P.: Term selection for query expansion in medical cross-lingual information retrieval. In: Azzopardi, L., Stein, B., Fuhr, N., Mayr, P., Hauff, C., Hiemstra, D. (eds.) ECIR 2019. LNCS, vol. 11437, pp. 507–522. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15712-8_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Bodenreider, O.: The unified medical language system (UMLs): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(Database issue), D267–D270 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mohan, S., Li, D.: MedMentions: a large biomedical corpus annotated with UMLs concepts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.09476 (2019)

  20. Ferreira, J.D., Teixeira, D.C., Pesquita, C.: Biomedical Ontologies: Coverage, Access and Use, pp. 382–395. Academic Press, Oxford (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gobbens, R.J., van Assen, M.A., Luijkx, K.G., Wijnen-Sponselee, M.T., Schols, J.: The Tilburg frailty indicator: psychometric properties. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 11(5), 344–355 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gobbens, R.J.J., van Assen, M.A.L.M.: The prediction of quality of life by physical, psychological and social components of frailty in community-dwelling older people. Qual. Life Res. 23(8), 2289–2300 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0672-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Koehn, P., Och, F.J., Marcu, D.: Statistical phrase-based translation. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, vol. 1, pp. 48–54. Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rockwood, K., Theou, O.: Using the clinical frailty scale in allocating scarce health care resources. Can. Geriatr. J. 23(3), 210–215 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Cheng Hwee Soh, Dr. Andrea Britta and Dr. Lim Kwang from University of Melbourne for providing the dataset for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yashodhya V. Wijesinghe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wijesinghe, Y.V., Xu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, Q. (2022). UMLS-Based Question-Answering Approach for Automatic Initial Frailty Assessment. In: Park, L.A.F., et al. Data Mining. AusDM 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1741. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8746-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8746-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8745-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8746-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics