Skip to main content

A Quantitative Comparison of the Role of Parameter Selection for Regularization in GRAPPA-Based Autocalibrating Parallel MRI

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Computer Vision and Image Processing

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1022))

  • 704 Accesses

Abstract

The suitability of regularized reconstruction in autocalibrating parallel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is quantitatively analyzed based on the choice of the regularization parameter. In this study, L-curve and generalized cross-validation (GCV) are adopted for parameter selection. The results show that: (1) Presence of well-defined L-corner does not guarantee an artifact-free reconstruction, (2) Sharp L-corners are not always observed in GRAPPA calibration, (3) Parameter values based on L-curves always exceed those based on GCV, and (4) Use of a predetermined number of filters based on the local signal power can result in a compromise between noise and artifacts as well as better visual perception. It is concluded that appropriate use of regularized solutions facilitates minimization of noise build-up in the reconstruction process, without enhancing the effects of aliasing artifacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Griswold, M.A., Jakob, P.M., Heidemann, R.M., Nittka, M., Jellus, V., Wang, J., Kiefer, B., Haase, A.: Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn. Reson. Med. 47, 1202–1210 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lustig, M., Pauly, J.: SPIRiT: iterative self-consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space. Magn. Reson. Med. 64, 457–471 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, J., Liu, C., Moseley, M.E.: Parallel reconstruction using null operations. Magn. Reson. Med. 66, 1241–1253 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tikhonov, A.N.: Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method. Soviet Math. Dokl. 4, 1035–1038 (1963)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Tikhonov, A.N., Arsenin, V.: Solutions of Ill-posed problems. Winston & Sons, Washington, DC, USA (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Breuer, F.A., Kannengiesser, S.A., Blaimer, M., Seiberlich, N., Jakob, P.M., Griswold, M.A.: General formulation for quantitative g-factor calculation in GRAPPA reconstructions. Magn. Reson. Med. 62, 739–746 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jakob, P.M., Griswold, M.A., Edelman, R.R., Sodickson, D.K.: AUTO-SMASH: a self calibrating technique for SMASH imaging: SiMultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics. Magma 7, 42–54 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sodickson, D.K., Manning, W.J.: Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn. Reson. Med. 38, 591–603 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morozov, V.A.: Methods for solving incorrectly posed problems. Springer, New York (1984)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen, P.C.: Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve. SIAM Rev. 34, 561–580 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Golub, G.H., Heath, M., Wahba, G.: Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics 21, 215–223 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hansen, P.C.: Regularization tools, a Matlab package for analysis of discrete regularization problems. Numer. Algorithms 6, 1–35 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Wahba, G., Wang, Y.: Behavior near zero of the distribution of GCV smoothing parameter estimates. Stat. Probabil. Lett. 25, 105–111 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansen, P.C.: Rank-deficient and discrete Ill-posed problems: numerical aspects of linear inversion, p. 247. SIAM, Philadelphia (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Qu, X., et al.: Undersampled MRI reconstruction with patch-based directional wavelets. Magn. Reson. Imag. 30, 964–977 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Maulana Azad national fellowship by UGC and planning board of Govt. of Kerala (GO(Rt)No. 101/2017/ITD.GOK(02/05/2017)) for the financial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raji Susan Mathew .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mathew, R.S., Paul, J.S. (2020). A Quantitative Comparison of the Role of Parameter Selection for Regularization in GRAPPA-Based Autocalibrating Parallel MRI. In: Chaudhuri, B., Nakagawa, M., Khanna, P., Kumar, S. (eds) Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Computer Vision and Image Processing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1022. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9088-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9088-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9087-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9088-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics