Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 285))

Abstract

Agents in highly dynamic multi-agent environments can break contracts. Hence, trust models play a critical role in making better evaluations of unknown candidates, and better decisions about when, and who, to interact, especially in e-commerce. However, current trust models do not contain any standard components. It is noted that finding standard components are effective in designing a trust model which can support heterogeneous information related to multi-agent systems. This paper compares and analyzes some recent trust models based on three important components: reliability, similarity, and satisfaction. In addition, a comparison is made between the most representative models to point out significant strengths and weaknesses that exist in current trust models. The ultimate goal of this study is to define the relationship between these components. This analysis helps to identify the standard components of trust models for e-commerce multi-agent systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aref, M. M.: A multi-agent system for natural language understanding, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems, Cambrige MA, pp. 36–40 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, Y., Vassileva, J.: A review on trust and reputation for web service selection, presented at the 27th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW’07), Toronto, Ontario, Canada (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xin, L.: Trust beyond reputation: Novel trust mechanisms for distributed environments, Nanyang Technological University (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou, L.: Organizational Knowledge Management Based on Social Network, in Second International Conference on Information and Computing Science (ICIC’09), pp. 289–292, Beijing, China (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Walter, F., Battiston, S., Schweitzer, F.: Coping with information overload through trust-based networks, in Managing Complexity: Insights, Concepts, Applications, D. Helbing, Ed., ed Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 273–300 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yu, T., Winslett, M., Seamons, K..: Automated trust negotiation over the internet, Proc. of Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, Y., Vassileva, J.: Bayesian network-based trust model, in Proceedings of IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI), pp. 372–378, Halifax, Canada (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lorenzi, F., Baldo, G., Costa, R., Abel, M., Bazzan, A., Ricci, F.: A Trust Model for Multiagent Recommendations, J. Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 2, pp. 310–318 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y. M., Kao, C. P.: TREPPS: A trust-based recommender system for peer production services, Expert systems with applications, 36, pp. 3263–3277 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Das, A., Islam, M. M., Sorwar, G.: Dynamic trust model for reliable transactions in multi-agent systems, in 13th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), pp. 1101–1106, Korea (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kulasekera, A., Gopura, R., Hemapala, K., Perera, N.: A review on multi-agent systems in microgrid applications, in Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT India), pp. 173–177, IEEE Press, India (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shoham Y, Leyton-Brown, K.: Multiagent systems: Algorithmic, game-theoretic, and logical foundations: Cambridge University Press (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pipattanasomporn, M., Feroze, H., Rahman, S.: Multi-agent systems in a distributed smart grid: Design and implementation, in Power Systems Conference and Exposition, PSCE’09, pp. 1–8, IEEE Press (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jung, Y., Kim, M., Masoumzadeh, A., Joshi, J. B. D.: A survey of security issue in multi-agent systems, Artificial Intelligence Review, pp. 1–22 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zacharia, G., Moukas, A., Maes, P.: Collaborative reputation mechanisms for electronic marketplaces, Decision support systems, 29, pp. 371–388 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Battiston, S., Walter, F. E., Schweitzer, F.: Impact of trust on the performance of a recommendation system in a social network, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies at the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS’06), pp. 1–15, United Kingdom (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Woo, J. W., Hwang, M. J., Lee, C. G., Youn, H. Y.: Dynamic role-based access control with trust-satisfaction and reputation for multi-agent system, in Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA) at IEEE 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, pp. 1121–1126, Perth, Australia (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sundresh, T. S.: Semantic reliability of multi‐agent intelligent systems, J. Bell Labs Technical, 11, pp. 225–236 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li, L., Li, H., Lu, G., Yao, S. W.: A Quantifiable Trust Model for Multi-agent System Based on Equal Relations, in International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, pp. 291–295, China (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Garruzzo, S., Rosaci, D.: The roles of reliability and reputation in competitive multi agent systems, in On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM, ed Berlin: Springer Berlin pp. 326–339, Heidelberg (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lu, J., Li, R., Lu, Z., Ma, X.: Primary-Backup Access Control Scheme for Securing P2P File-Sharing Systems, International J. Information Technology, 1, pp. 8–15 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Firdhous, M., Ghazali, O., Hassan, S.: Trust Management in Cloud Computing: A Critical Review, International J. Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ICTer), 4, pp. 24–36 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hang, C. W., Wang, Y., Singh, M. P.: An adaptive probabilistic trust model and its evaluation, in Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 1485–1488, Estoril, Portugal (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bustos, F., López, J., Julián, V., Rebollo, M.: STRS: Social Network Based Recommender System for Tourism Enhanced with Trust, in International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence 2008 (DCAI 2008), pp. 71–79 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Das, A., Islam, M. M.: SecuredTrust: A Dynamic Trust Computation Model for Secured Communication in Multiagent Systems, Dependable and Secure Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 9, pp. 261–274 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elham Majd .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Majd, E., Balakrishnan, V. (2014). Analysis of Trust Models to Improve E-Commerce Multi-Agent Systems. In: Herawan, T., Deris, M., Abawajy, J. (eds) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advanced Data and Information Engineering (DaEng-2013). Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 285. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-18-7_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-18-7_69

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-4585-17-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-4585-18-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics