Skip to main content
Log in

Teleoperation to robotics at Langley Research Center

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A popular conception of the evolution of remote manipulation is a progression from teleoperation to telerobotics and then to robotics. This is logical because in going from teleoperation to robotics there would appear to be a continuous decrease in manned workload, an increase in system complexity, and an increase in the amount of “intelligence” in the automated system. During the past 10 years NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) has been involved in all three areas. The decision on which system is most suitable for a task depends not only on the task, but on the allocation of responsibility for intelligence or high level control. The operator may be responsible for all intelligence and control functions, they may be shared between the operator and the automated system, or they may be performed by an autonomous system. This paper discusses some of the experiences in each area in applications related to possible space tasks and some of the lessons learned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. J. Burgerjon, E. L. Ekberg, D. L. Grisham, R. A. Horne, R. E. Meyer, C. R. Flatau, and K. B. Wilson, “Solution for remote handling in accelerator installations,” Particle Accelerator Conference, Chicago, IL, 1977.

  2. J. J. Fisher and J. S. Bird, “Future of robots in nuclear plants and processes,” Executive Conference on Remote Operation and Robotics in the Nuclear Industry, Pine Mountain, GA, 1985.

  3. W. L. Heard, Jr., J. J. Watson, J. L. Ross, S. C. Spring, and M. L. Cleave, “Results of the ACCESS space construction shuttle flight experiment,” AIAA Space Systems Technology Conference, San Diego, CA, 1986.

  4. R. W. Mixon, W. Hankins, III, and M. A. Wise, “Robotic space construction,” Space 88, Engineering, Construction, and Operation in Space Conference, Al-buquerque, NM, 1988.

  5. D. McAffee, E. Snow, W. Townsend, L. Robinson, and J. Hanson, “A new six-degree-of-freedom force-reflecting hand controller for space telerobotic,” 24th Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium, John F. Kennedy Space Center, FL, 1990.

  6. W. W. Hankins, III and R. W. Mixon, “Manual control of the Langley Laboratory Telerobotic Manipulator,” 1989 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Cambridge, MA, 1989.

  7. H. L. Martin, D. P. Kuban, J. N. Herndon, D. M. Williams, and W. R. Hamel, “Recommendations for the next-generation space telerobot system,” DOE Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Report TM-9951, January 1988.

  8. K. Cornils and P. W. Goode, “Location of planar targets in three space from monocular images,” 1987 Goddard Conference on Space Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, 1987.

  9. Thermal Protection System Process Automation Study, Final Report. Kennedy Space Center, Report KSC-DM-3491, October 1990.

  10. Payload Processing System Study, Final Report. Kennedy Space Center, Report KSC-DM-3489, October 1990.

  11. M. D. Rhodes, R. W. Will, and M. A. Wise, “A telerobotic system for automated assembly of large space structures,” NASA Technical Memorandum, March 1989.

  12. R. W. Will and M. D. Rhodes, “An automated assembly system for large space structures,” SPIE Symposium on Advances in Intelligent Systems, Cooperative Intelligent Robotics in Space, 1990.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pennington, J.E. Teleoperation to robotics at Langley Research Center. Appl Intell 2, 155–162 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058760

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058760

Key words

Navigation