Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating knowledge acquisition and language acquisition

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Very large knowledge bases constitute an important step for artificial intelligence and will have significant effects on the field of natural language processing. This paper describes LUKE, a tool that allows a knowledge base builder to create an English language interface by associating words and phrases with knowledge base entities. The philosophy behind LUKE is that knowledge about language is built up at the same time as knowledge about the world. LUKE assumes no linguistic expertise on the part of the user—that expertise is built directly into the tool itself. LUKE draws its power from a large set of heuristics about how words are typically used to describe the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Kuno, “Computer analysis of natural languages,” in Proc. Symposia in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 19, American Mathematical Society. Rhode Island, 1967. pp. 52–110.

  2. T. Winograd, “A procedural model of language under-standing,” in Computer Models of Thought and Language, by R. C. Schank and K. M. Colby, editors. Freeman: San Francisco, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Quillian, “Semantic memory,” in Semantic Information Processing, by M. Minsky, editor, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Barnett, K. Knight, I. Mani, and E. A. Rich, “Knowledge and natural language processing.”Communications of the ACM, vol. 33, pp. 50–71, 1990.

  5. K. Knight,Integrating Knowledge Acquisition and Language Acquisition, PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 1991.

  6. D. B. Lenat and R. V. Guha,Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems, Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. J. Grosz, D. E. Appelt, P. A. Martin, and F. C. N. Pereira, “TEAM: An experiment in the design of transportable natural-language interfaces,”Artificial Intelligence. vol. 32. pp. 173–243, 1987.

  8. B. Ballard and D. E. Stumberger, “Semantic acquisition in TELI: A transportable, user-customized natural language processor,” in Proc. 24th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1986.

  9. J. Barnett, E. Rich, and D. Wroblewski, “Functional interface to a knowledge base for use by a natural language processing system,” Technical Report ACT-NL-019-91, MCC, 1991.

  10. K. Wittenburg, “A parser for portable NL interfaces using graph-unification-based grammars,” in Proc. of the Fifth National Conference of AAAI, 1986.

  11. D. A. Cruse,Lexical Semantics, Cambridge University Press, 1986.

  12. M. Bates and R. Bobrow, “A transportable natural language interface,” in Proc. Sixth Annual ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1983.

  13. B. Ballard, “User specification of syntactic case frames in TELI, a transportable, user-customized natural language processor,” in Proc. International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-86), 1986, pp. 454–460.

  14. B. Thompson and F. Thompson, “Introducing ASK, a simple knowledgeable system,” in Proc. Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, 1983, pp. 17–24.

  15. M. Templeton and J. Burger, “Problems in natural language interface to DBMS with examples from EUFID,” in Proc. Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, 1983, pp. 3–16.

  16. EDR, “An overview of the EDR electronic dictionaries,” Technical Report TR-024, Japan Electronic Dictionary Research Institute, LTD., Mita-Kokusai Building, 4–28 Mita I-Chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108, Japan, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Carlson and S. Nirenburg, “World modeling for NLP,” Technical Report CMU-CMT-90-121, Center for Machine Translation, Carnegie Mellon University, 1990.

  18. J. Bateman, “Upper modeling: Organizing knowledge for natural language processing,” in Proc. Fifth International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990.

  19. J. Bateman, R. Kasper, J. Moore, and R. Whitney, “A general organization of knowledge for natural language processing: The Penman Upper Model,” Technical report, USC/Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, California, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Stein, editor,The Random House College Dictionary, Revised Edition, Random House, Inc.: New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Brent, “Earning dividends on lexical knowledge: How the rich can get richer,” in Proc. of the First International Lexical Acquisition Workshop, 1989.

  22. J. Schlimmer, “Learning meta knowledge for database checking,” in Proc. AAAI-91, 1991, pp. 335–340.

  23. J. F. Lehman,Adaptive Parsing: Self-Extending Natural Language Interfaces, PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 1989.

  24. A. Hauptmann,Meaning from Structure in Natural Language Processing, PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 1991.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under contract IRI-8858085.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knight, K. Integrating knowledge acquisition and language acquisition. Appl Intell 1, 277–295 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122018

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122018

Key words

Navigation