Skip to main content
Log in

The atom assignment problem in automated de novo drug design. 5. Tests for envelope-directed fragment placement based on molecular similarity

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The fragment placement method has been successfully extended to the problem of envelope-directed design. The atom assignment paradigm was based on molecular similarity between two molecular structures. A composite supersurface is defined to form the surface onto which the molecular fields are projected. The assignment process is then determined by using molecular similarity in the objective function to be optimized. In principle, this procedure is closely similar to that outlined in the previous paper for site-directed design. The rationale has been extensively tested on two benzodiazepine antagonists believed to bind to the same site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dean, P.M. (Ed.) Molecular Similarity in Drug Design, Blackie Academic and Professional, London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cramer, III, R.D., Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.D., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 5959.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, K.H., In Dean, P.M. (Ed.) Molecular Similarity in Drug Design, Blackie Academic and Professional, London, 1995, pp. 291–331.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Perkins, T.D.J. and Dean, P.M., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 7 (1993) 155.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barakat, M.T. and Dean, P.M., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 341.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barakat, M.T. and Dean, P.M., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 351.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barakat, M.T. and Dean, P.M., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 359.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barakat, M.T. and Dean, P.M., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 448.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis, R.A. and Leach, A.R., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 467.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Codding, P.W. and Muir, A.K.S., Mol. Pharmacol., 28 (1985) 178.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bertolasi, V., Ferretti, V., Gilli, G. and Borea, P.A., Acta Crystallogr., C, 40 (1984) 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burkert, U. and Allinger, N.L., Molecular Mechanics, ACS Monograph Series, Vol. 177, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Borea, P.A., Dean, P.M., Martin, I.L. and Perkins, T.D.J., Mol. Neuropharmacol., 2 (1992) 261.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barakat, M.T. and Dean, P.M., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 5 (1991) 107.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barakat, M.T., Dean, P.M. The atom assignment problem in automated de novo drug design. 5. Tests for envelope-directed fragment placement based on molecular similarity. J Computer-Aided Mol Des 9, 457–462 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124003

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124003

Keywords

Navigation