Skip to main content
Log in

Computational organizational network modeling: Strategies and an example

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper articulates the logic of computational organizational modeling as a strategy for theory construction and testing in the field of organizational communication networks. The paper introduces, Blanche, and objectoriented simulation environment that supports quantitative modeling and analysis of the evolution of organizational networks. Blanche relies on the conceptual primitives of attributes that describe network nodes and links that connect these nodes. Difference equations are used to model the dynamic properties of the network as it changes over time. This paper describes the design of Blanche and how it supports both the process of theory construction, model building and analysis of results. The paper concludes with an empirical example, to test the predictions of a network-based social influence model for the adoption of a new communication technology in the workplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blau, P.M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, M. (1994), “Social Interaction Effects Following a Technological Change: A Longitudinal Investigation,” Academy of Management Journal, 37, 869–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1982), Toward a Structural theory of Action, New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. (1995), “Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory: Perspective and Directions,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1(1), 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. and M. Prietula (Eds.) (1994), Computational Organization Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, N.S. (1994), “Self-Organizing Systems Perspective in the Study of Organizational Communication,” in B. Kovacic (Ed.), New Approaches to the Organizational Communication, pp. 39–66, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, N.S. and E.M. Eisenberg (1990), “Communication Networks and New Media in Organizations,” in J. Fulk and C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology, pp. 143–172, Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, N.S. and D.R. Seibold (1993), “Theoretical Frameworks for the Study of Structuring Processes in Group Decision Support Systems: Adaptive Structuration Theory and Self-Organizing Systems Theory,” Human Communication Research, 19, 528–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, N. and S. Grant (1996), “The Emergence of Shared Interpretations in Organizations: A Self-Organizing Systems Perspective,” in J. Watt and A.Van Lear (Eds.), Cycles and Dynamic Processes in Communication Processes, 215–230, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corman, S. (1996), “Cellular Automata as Models of Unintended Consequences of Organizational Communication,” in J. Watt and A.Van Lear (Eds.) Cycles and Dynamic Processes in Communication Processes, 191–212, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J.W. (1961), Industrial Dynamics. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J.W. (1973), World Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J., J. Schmitz and C. Steinfield (1990), “A Social Influence Model of Technology Use,” in J. Fulk and C. Steinfield (Eds.) Organizations and Communication Technology, 117–140, Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J. and C. Steinfeld (Eds.) (1990), Organizations and Communication Technology. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. (1997), Organization Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, R.A. (1988), Computer-Assisted Theory Building: Modeling Dynamic Social Systems. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, R.L. and J.D. Johnson (1989), “Social Contagion and Multiplexity: Communication Networks as Predictors of Commitment and Role Ambiguity,” Human Communication Research, 15, 523–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958), The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P.M., N. Contractor, B. O'Keefe and S.C.-Y. Lu (1994), “Competence Models and Self-Organizing Systems: Towards Intelligent, Evolvable, Collaborative Support,” Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, San Antonio, TX, 1, 367–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P.M., N. Contractor, B. O'Keefe, S.C.-Y. Lu, M. Case, P. Lawrence and F. Grobler (1995), “Work Flow and Cooperative Problem Solving in Civil Infrastructure Management,” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vancouver, BC, 5, 4575–4580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M. and D. Krackhardt (1993), Schemas at Work: Making Sense of Organizational Relationships. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Kontopoulos, K.M. (1993), The Logic of Social Structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D., J. Blythe and C. McGrath (1994), “KrackPlot V3.0, an Improved Network Drawing Program,” Connections, 17, 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, R. and R. Wolfe (1984), “Revision of the Self-Monitoring Scale,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1349–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B.E. and A.J. Lott (1960), “The Formation of Positive Attitudes Toward Group Members,” Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 61, 297–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micro Analysis and Design Simulation Software (1990), Getting started with MicroSaint (Computer program manual). Boulder, CO: Micro Analysis & Design Simulation Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monge, P.R. and E.M. Eisenberg (1987), “Emergent Communication Networks,” in F. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts and L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication, 104–132, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monge, P.R. and N.S. Contractor (in press), “Emergence of Communication Networks,” in F. Jablin and L. Putnam (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication, (2nd edition), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Morecroft, J.D.W. and J.D. Sterman (1994), Modeling for Learning Organizations. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, B. and S. Peterson (1990), STELLA II User's Guide (Computer Program Manual). Hanover, NH: High Performance Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock-Evans, R. (1989), An Introduction to Data and Activity Analysis. QED Information Sciences.

  • Rogers, E.M. and D. Kincaid (1981), Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G.R. and J. Pfeffer (1978), “A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1987), Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline. The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohl, C. (1995), Organizational Communication: Connectedness in Action. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D. (1967), Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeggelink, E.P.H. (1993), Strangers into Friends: The Evolution of Friendship Networks Using an Individual Oriented Modeling Approach. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hyatt, A., Contractor, N. & Jones, P. Computational organizational network modeling: Strategies and an example. Comput Math Organiz Theor 2, 285–300 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132313

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132313

Keywords

Navigation