Skip to main content
Log in

Lack of convexity of threshold curves for compound grating: implications for modelling visual pattern detection

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Threshold contrasts were determined for complex gratings made from pairs of sine-wave gratings with various spatial frequencies and contrast ratios. It was found that the plots representing the relationship between the contrast of two-component gratings with frequencies f 1=2.0 deg−1 and f 2=kf 1, (1.03 ⩽ k ⩽ 3.0), when the compound was at threshold (the so-called contrast threshold curves), tend to have either an elliptical (for k ⩽ 1.5) or a rectangular (for k=3) form. Nevertheless, the elliptical fits as the matched-channel model predicted, and the roundedly rectangular fits, as the probability-summation models predicted, were very poor. Furthermore, statistical analysis shows that two of the six contrast threshold curves exhibiting a significant local disturbance fail to be convex.Theoretical treatment in terms of convex analysis shows that such a convexity violation of the contrast threshold curves rules out the possibility of detection being produced by a single linear channel as well as a parallel array of linear channels, either with or without probability summation, provided that the detection principle of the most sensitive channel is adopted. The adaptive matched-channel model originally proposed by Hauske cannot also account for the results obtained; however, it can be modified to be in line with them. We hypothesise that the detection in our experiment is likely to occur by means of several (no more than seven or eight) adaptive partially matched channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blackwell HR (1963) Neural theories of simple visual discriminations. J Opt Soc Am 36:129–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell HR, Chiou W, Blackwell BR (1978) Current status of research on the spatial organization of the human visual system at detection threshold. In: Cool SJ, Smith EL III (eds) Frontiers in visual science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 264–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert FJJ, Heynen GM, Roufs JAJ (1987) Point spread functions and detail detection. Spatial Vision 2:99–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrowski L (1982) Rules of forming receptive fields of formal neurones during unsupervised learning processes. Biol Cybern 43:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Caelli T, Rentschier I, Scheidler W (1987) Visual pattern recognition in humans. I. Evidence for adaptive filtering. Biol Cybern 57:233–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell FW, Robson JG (1968) Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. J Physiol (Lond) 197:551–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell FW, Carpenter RHS, Levinson JZ (1969) Visibility of aperiodic pattern compared with that of sinusoidal gratings. J Physiol (Lond) 204:283–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham N (1977) Visual detection of aperiodic spatial stimuli by probability summation among narrowband channels. Vision Res 17:637–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham N (1980) Spatial-frequency channels in human vision: detecting edges without edge detectors. In: Harris CS (eds) Visual coding and adaptability. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 215–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham N (1985) Detection and identification of near-threshold visual patterns. J Opt Soc Am [A] 2:1468–1482

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham N (1989) Visual pattern analyzers. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham N, Nachmias J (1971) Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: a comparison of single-channel and multiple-channel models. Vision Res 11:251–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham N, Robson JG (1987) Summation of very close spatial frequencies: the importance of spatial probability summation. Vision Res 27:1997–2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham N, Robson JG, Nachmias J (1978) Grating summation in fovea and periphery. Vision Res 18:815–825

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauske G, Wolf W, Lupp U (1976) Matched filters in human vision. Biol Cybern 22:181–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauske G, Lupp U, Wolf W (1978) Matched filters. A new concept in vision. Photogr Sci Eng 22:59–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel DH (1988) Eye, brain and vision. Scientific American, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink JJ, Doom AJ van (1978) Detectability of power fluctuations of temporal visual noise. Vision Res 18:191–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulikowski JJ, King-Smith PE (1973) Spatial arrangement of line edge and grating detectors revealed by subthreshold summation. Vision Res 13:1455–1478

    Google Scholar 

  • Limb JO, Rubinstein CB (1977) A model of threshold vision incorporating inhomogeneity of the visual field. Vision Res 21:1409–1412

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd E (ed) (1984) Statistics. (Handbook of applicable mathematics, vol. 6 Part A), Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Logvinenko AD (1985) Sensory basis of space perception (in Russian). Moscow University Press, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Logvinenko AD (1990) Nonlinear analysis of spatial vision using first-and second-order Volterra transfer functions measurement. Vision Res 30:2031–2057

    Google Scholar 

  • Logvinenko AD (1991) Failure of convexity of contrast threshold curves. Preception 20:82

    Google Scholar 

  • Matin L (1975) Ricco's law: response as a power function of stimulus luminance and distance from target center. Vision Res 15:1381–1384

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen U (1988) Visual contrast detection by a single channel versus probability summation among channels. Biol Cybern 59:137–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostafavi H, Sakrison DJ (1976) Structure and properties of a single channel in the human visual system. Vision Res 16:957–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins WW (1978) Convexity theorem for subthershold stimuli in linear models of visual contrast detection. J Opt Soc Am 68:456–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Olzak LA, Thomas JP (1986) Seeing spatial patterns. In:Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP (eds) Sensory processes and perception. (Handbook of perception and human performance, vol 1, Chap. 7) Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Quick RF Jr (1974) A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. Kybernetik 16:65–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Quick RF Jr, Reichert TA (1975) Spatial-frequency selectivity in contrast detection. Vision Res 15:637–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Quick RF Jr, Mullins WW, Reichert TA (1978) Spatial summation effects on two-component grating thresholds. J Opt Soc Am 68:116–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashbass C (1970) The visibility of transient changes of luminance. J Physiol (Lond) 210:165–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs MB, Nachmias J, Robson JG (1971) Spatial-frequency channels in human vision. J Opt Soc Am 61:1176–1186

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JP (1985) Detection and identification: how are they related? J Opt Soc Am [A] 2:1457–1467

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsypkin Ya Z (1973) Foundation of the theory of learning systems. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson AB (1982) Summation of grating patches indicates many types of detector at one retinal location. Vision Res 22:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson AB, Nachmias J (1977) Patterns of temporal interaction in the detection of gratings. Vision Res 17:893–902

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson AB, Robson JG (1981) Discrimination at threshold: labelled detectors in human vision. Vision Res 21:1115–1122

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener N (1932) Tauberian theorems. Ann Math 33:1–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson HR, Bergen JR (1979) A four mechanism model for threshold spatial vision. Vision Res 19:19–32

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Logvinenko, A.D. Lack of convexity of threshold curves for compound grating: implications for modelling visual pattern detection. Biol. Cybern. 70, 55–64 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202566

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202566

Keywords

Navigation