Skip to main content
Log in

Illuminant precompensation for texture discrimination using filters

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Texture-discrimination algorithms have often been tested on images containing either mosaics of synthetic textures or artificially created mosaics of real textures — in any case, images in which most of the changes in intensity can be ascribed to the textures themselves. However, real images are not formed like this and may contain steep gradations in intensity which have nothing to do with local texture, such as those caused by incident shadows. A texture discrimination algorithm based on linear filters can fail in the presence of these strong gradations, as they may easily contain an order of magnitude more energy than the gradations in intensity due to texture in the image per se. In these cases, the mechanism may become responsive only to strong luminance effects, and not to texture. I have found that good performance on natural images containing texture can only be obtained from a filter-based texture detection scheme if it includes a stage which attempts to bring large intensity gradients within bounds. The exact nature of the best precompensator appears to depend somewhat on the way the filter outputs are processed. The fit to psychophysical data and the implications for more detailed models of human texture processing will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bovik AC, Clark M, Geisler WS (1990) Multichannel texture analysis using localized spatial filters. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12:56

    Google Scholar 

  • Canny J (1983) Finding edges and lines in images. MIT AI Lab Tech Rep 720

  • Cavanagh P (1987) Reconstructing the third dimension — interactions between color, texture, motion, binocular disparity and shape. Comput Vision Graphics Image Process 37:171

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble E, Poggio T (1987) Visual integration and detection of discontinuities: the key role of intensity edges. MIT AI Lab Memo 970

  • Geiger D, Girosi F (1989) Parallel and deterministic algorithms for MRFs: surface reconstruction and integration. MIT AI Lab Memo 1114

  • Geman S, Geman D (1984) Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 6:721

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg S, Mingolla E (1985) Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations. Percept Psychophys 38:141

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurnsey R, Browse R (1987) Micropattern properties and presentation conditions influencing visual texture discrimination. Percept Psychophys 41:239

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeger D (1989) Computational model of cat striate physiology. MIT Media Lab Tech Rep 125

  • Hurlbert A, Poggio T (1987) Learning a color algorithm from examples. MIT AI Lab Memo 909

  • Hurlbert A, Poggio T (1988) Synthesizing a color algorithm from examples. Science 239:482

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz B (1981a) Textons, the elements of texture perception and their interactions. Nature 290:91

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz B (1981b) A theory of preattentive texture discrimination based on first-order statistics of textons. Biol Cybern 41:131

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz B (1986) Texton gradients: the texton theory revisited. Biol Cybern 54:245

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz B, Bergen JR (1983) Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception of textures. Bell System Tech J 62:119

    Google Scholar 

  • Kröse B (1987) Local structure analyzers as determinants of preattentive pattern discrimination. Biol Cybern 55:289

    Google Scholar 

  • Land E (1964) The retinex. Am Sci 52:247

    Google Scholar 

  • Land E (1986) An alternative technique for the computation of the designator in the retinex theory of color vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:3078

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik J, Perona P (1989) A computational model of texture perception. UC Berkeley Tech Rep UCB/CSD 89/491

  • Malik J, Perona P (1990) Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. J Opt Soc Am [A] 7:923

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio T, Little J, Gamble E, Gillett W, Geiger D, Weinshall D, Villalba M, Larson N, Cass T, Bülthoff H, Drumheller M, Oppenheimer P, Yang W, Hurlbert A, Beymer D, O'Donnell P (1990) The MIT vision machine. In: Winston PH (eds) Artificial intelligence at MIT: expanding frontiers. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 492–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley M (1981) The representation of image texture. MIT AI Lab Tech Rep 649

  • Reed TR, Wechsler H (1990) Segmentation of textured images and gestalt organization using spatial/spatial-frequency representations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M (1986) Texture discrimination by Gabor functions. Biol Cybern 55:71

    Google Scholar 

  • VanGool L, Dewaele P, Oosterlinck A (1983) Texture analysis anno 1983. Comput Vision Graphics Image Process 29:336

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees H (1987) Finding texture boundaries in images. MIT AI Lab Tech Rep 986

  • Voorhees H, Poggio T (1988) Computing texture boundaries from images. Nature 333:364–367

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thau, R.S. Illuminant precompensation for texture discrimination using filters. Biol. Cybern. 71, 239–250 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202763

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202763

Keywords

Navigation