Skip to main content
Log in

Optimising synaptic learning rules in linear associative memories

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Associative matrix memories with real-valued synapses have been studied in many incarnations. We consider how the signal/noise ratio for associations depends on the form of the learning rule, and we show that a covariance rule is optimal. Two other rules, which have been suggested in the neurobiology literature, are asymptotically optimal in the limit of sparse coding. The results appear to contradict a line of reasoning particularly prevalent in the physics community. It turns out that the apparent conflict is due to the adoption of different underlying models. Ironically, they perform identically at their co-incident optima. We give details of the mathematical results, and discuss some other possible derivations and definitions of the signal/noise ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bienenstock E, Cooper LN, Munro P (1982) Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: Orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. J Neurosci 2:32–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss TVP, Lømo T (1973) Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anæsthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol (London) 232:331–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham JT (1991) Computation in the archicortex. PhD Thesis, Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh

  • Buhman J, Divko R, Schulten K (1989) On sparsely coded associative memories. In: Personnaz L, Dreyfus G (eds) Neural networks: from models to applications. nEURO88, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda RO, Hart PE (1973) Pattern classification and scene analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffan D (1974) Recognition impaired and association intact in the memory of monkeys after transection of the fornix. J Comp Physiol Psychol 86:1100–1109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner E (1988) The space of interactions in neural network models. J Phys A: Math Gen 21:257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock PJB, Smith LS, Phillips WA (1991) A biologically supported error-correcting learning rule. Neural Computation (in press)

  • Hebb DO (1949) The organization of behavior: a neuropsychological theory. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopfield JJ (1982) Neural networks and physical systems with emergent computational abilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 79:2554–2558

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ito M, Sakurai M, Tongroach P (1982) Climbing fibre induced depression of both mossy fibre responsiveness and glutamate sensitivity of cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Physiol 324:113–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanerva P (1988) Sparse distributed memory. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen T (1972) Correlation matrix memories. IEEE Trans Comput C-21:353–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr D (1971) Simple memory: a theory for archicortex. Philos Trans Soc London B 262:23–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm G (1988a) On the asymptotic information storage capacity of neural networks. In: Eckmiller R, von der Malsburg C (eds) Neural computers. NATO ASI Series F41. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg New York, pp 271–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm G (1988b) Local synaptic rules with maximal information storage capacity. In: Haken H (eds) Neural and synergetic computers Springer Series in Synergetics, vol 42. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg New York, pp 100–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Vincente CJ, Amit DJ (1989). Optimised network for sparsely coded patterns. J Phys A: Math Gen 22:559–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Racine RJ, Milgram NW, Hafner S (1983) Long-term potentiation phenomena in the rat limbic forebrain. Brain Res 260:217–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sejnowski TJ (1977a) Storing covariance with nonlinearly interacting neurons. J Math Biol 4:303–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sejnowski TJ (1977b) Statistical constraints on synaptic plasticity. J Theor Biol 69:385–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer W (1985) Activity-dependent self-organization of synaptic connections as a substrate of learning. In: Changeux JP, Konishi M (eds) The neural and molecular bases of learning. Wiley, New York, pp 301–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton P, Sejnowski TJ (1989) Associative long-term depression in the hippocampus: Induction of synaptic plasticity by Hebbian covariance. Nature 339:215–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stent GS (1973) A physiological mechanism for Hebb's postulate of learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci 70:997–1001

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsodyks MV, Fiegel'man MV (1988) The enhanced storage capacity in neural networks with low activity level. Europhys Lett 6:101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Willshaw DJ (1971) Models of distributed associative memory. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh

  • Willshaw DJ, Dayan P (1990) Optimal plasticity in matrix memories: what goes up MUST come down. Neural Comput 2:85–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Willshaw DJ, Buneman OP, Longuet-Higgins HC (1969) Nonholographic associative memory. Nature 222:960–962

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dayan, P., Willshaw, D.J. Optimising synaptic learning rules in linear associative memories. Biol. Cybern. 65, 253–265 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00206223

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00206223

Keywords

Navigation