Skip to main content
Log in

The problem of guaranteeing the existence of a complete set of reductions

  • Basic Research Problems
  • Published:
Journal of Automated Reasoning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is the eleventh of a series of articles discussing various open research problems in automated reasoning. Here we focus on finding criteria for guaranteeing the existence of a complete set of reductions. We include a suggestion for evaluating a proposed solution to this research problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buchberger, B., ‘Basic features and development of the critical-pair/completion procedure’, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications, Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 202, ed. J.-P. Jouannaud, Springer-Verlag, New York (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dershowitz, N., ‘Termination’, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications, Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 202, ed. J.-P. Jouannaud, Springer-Verlag, New York (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grau, A., ‘Ternary Boolean algebra’, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 53, 567–572 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huet, G. and Oppen, D., ‘Equations and rewrite rules: A survey’, pp. 349–405 in Formal Language Theory, Perspectives and Open Problems, ed. R. V. Book, Academic Press, New York (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knuth, D. and Bendix, P., ‘Simple word problems in universal algebras’, pp. 263–297 in Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra, ed. J. Leech, Pergamon Press, New York (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson, G. and Wos, L., ‘Paramodulation and theorem-proving in first-order theories with equality’, pp. 135–150 in Machine Intelligence 4, ed. B. Meltzer and D. Michie, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Winker, S., ‘Generation and verification of finite models and counterexamples using an automated theorem prover answering two open questions’, Journal of the ACM 29, 273–284 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wos, L., Automated Reasoning: 33 Basic Research Problems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wos, L., Overbeek, R., Lusk, E., and Boyle, J., Automated Reasoning: Introduction and Applications, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wos, L. and Robinson, G., ‘Maximal models and refutation completeness: Semidecision procedures in automatic theorem proving’, pp. 609–639 in Word Problems: Decision Problems and the Burnside Problem in Group Theory, ed. W. Boone, F. Cannonito, and R. Lyndon, North-Holland, New York (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wos, L., Robinson, G., Carson, D., and Shalla, L., ‘The concept of demodulation in theorem proving’, Journal of the ACM, 14, 698–709 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by the Applied Mathematical Sciences subprogram of the Office of Energy Research, U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wos, L. The problem of guaranteeing the existence of a complete set of reductions. J Autom Reasoning 5, 399–401 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248325

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248325

Key words

Navigation