Skip to main content
Log in

Inductive inference from theory laden data

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Angluin D.: 1980, ‘Inductive Inference of Formal Languages from Positive Data’Informations and Control 45, 117–135.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angluin, D. and C. Smith, “A Survey of Inductive Inference Methods”, Technical Report 250, Yale University (October 1982).

  3. Blumer A., A. Ehrenfeucht, D. Haussler and M. Warmuth: 1987,Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension, Research Report UCSC-CRL-87–20, Dept. of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Cruz.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feyerabend, P. K.: 1980, “How to be a Good Empiricist”, inChallenges to Empiricism, Harold Morick, ed., 164–193.

  5. Gaifman H. and M. Snir: 1982, “Probabilities over Rich Languages. Testing and Randomness”,Journal of Symbolic Logic,47:3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gold E. M.: 1965, “Limiting Recursion”,Journal of Symbolic Logic 30, 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gold E. M.: 1967, “Language Identification in the Limit”,Information and Control 10, 447–474.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goodman N.: 1978,Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Halmos P. R.: 1970,Measure Theory, New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hanson N. R.: 1965,Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kelly K. and C. Glymour: 1989, “Convergence to the Truth and Nothing but the Truth”,Philosophy of Science 56: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kelly K. and C. Glymour: 1990, “Theory Discovery from Data with Mixed Quantifiers”,Journal of Phiosophical Logic 19, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuhn T. S.: 1970,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Laudan, L.: 1980, “Why was the Logic of Discovery Abandoned?”, inScientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality, T. Nickles, (ed.).

  15. Osherson D., and S. Weinstein: 1989, “Paradigms of Truth Detection”,Journal of Philosophical Logic,18, 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Osherson D., M. Stob, and S. Weinstein: 1986,Systems that Learn, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Putnam H.: 1963 “‘Degree of Confirmation’ and inductive Logic”, inThe Philosophy of Rudolph Carnap, A. Schilpp (ed.), Lasalle, Illinois: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Putnam H.: 1965, “Trial and Error Predicates and a Solution to a Problem of Mostowski”,Journal of Symbolic Logic 30: 1, 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Quine, W. V. O.: 1980, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”inChallenges to Empiricism, Harold Morick, (ed.).

  20. Rorty R.: 1979,Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sellars, W.: 1980, “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”, inChallenges to Empiricism, Harold Morick, (ed.), 95–107.

  22. Valiant L.: 1984, “A theory of the Learnable”,Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, vol. 27, 1134–1142.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, K.T., Glymour, C. Inductive inference from theory laden data. J Philos Logic 21, 391–444 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00260743

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00260743

Keywords

Navigation