Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Whither relevance logic?

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D.,Entailment, vol. 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avron, A., Relevant entailment: semantics and formal systems,J.S.L. 49 (1984), pp. 334–342.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Avron, A., Relevance and paraconsistency — A new approach,J.S.L. 55 (1990), pp. 707–732.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avron, A., Relevance and paraconsistency — A new approach. Part II: The formal systems.N.D.J.F.L. 31 (1990), pp. 169–202.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Avron, A., Relevance and paraconsistency — A new approach. Part III: Cut free Gentzen-type systems.N.D.J.F.L. 32 (1991), pp. 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Avron, A., Simple Consequence Relations,Information and Computation 92 (1991), pp. 105–139.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Avron, A., A constructive analysis of RM,J.S.L. 52 (1987), pp. 939–951.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burgess, J. P., Relevance — a fallacy?,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (1981), pp. 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Church, A., The weak theory of implication, in:Kontrollcenter Denken, ed. by Menne, Wilhelm & Angsil, Munich (1951), pp. 22–37

    Google Scholar 

  10. Došen, K., Sequent-systems and groupoid models, I and II,Studia Logica 47 (1988), pp. 353–385 and48 (1989), pp. 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dunn, J. M., Relevant logic and entailment, in:Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. III, ed. by D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, Reidel: Dordrecht, Holland: Boston: U.S.A. (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Feferman, S., Hilbert program relativized: proof-theoretical and foundational reductions,J.S.L. 53 (1988), pp. 364–383.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gentzen, G., The concept of infinity in mathematics, in:The Collected Work of Gerhard Gentzen, edited by M. E. Szabo, pp. 223–233, North-Holland, Amsterdam, (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Girard, J. Y., Linear logic,Theoretical Computer Science 50 (1987), pp. 1–101.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hacking, I., What is logic,The Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979), pp. 285–318.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meyer, R. K., ‘Why I am not a relevantist’, Research paper No. I, Logic group, R.S.S.S., Austrial National University.

  17. Meyer, R. K. and McRobbie, M. A., Multisets and relevant implication,Australian J. of Philosophy 60 (1982), pp. 107–139.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Routley, R., Meyer, R. K., Plumwood, V., and Brady, R.,Relevant Logics and Their Rivals. Part 1: The Basic Philosophical and Semantical Theory, Ridgeview, Atascadero, California, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sobocínski, B., Axiomatization of partial system of three-valued calculus of proposition,The Journal of Computing Systems 11(1) (1952), pp. 23–55.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Urquhart, A., The undecidability of entailment and relevant implication,J.S.L. 49 (1984), pp. 1059–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wójcicki, R.,Theory of Logical Calculi, Synthese Library/Vol. 199, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1988).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Raymond and Beverly Sackler, Faculty of Exact Sciences, School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, 69978, Ramat-Aviv, Israel

    Arnon Avron

Authors
  1. Arnon Avron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Avron, A. Whither relevance logic?. J Philos Logic 21, 243–281 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00260930

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00260930

Search

Navigation