Abstract
Recently several philosophers of science have proposed what has come to be known as the semantic account of scientific theories. It is presented as an improvement on the positivist account, which is now called the syntactic account of scientific theories. Bas van Fraassen claims that the syntactic account does not give a satisfactory definition of “empirical adequacy” and “empirical equivalence”. He contends that his own semantic account does define these notations acceptably, through the concept of “embeddability”, a concept which he claims cannot be defined syntactically. Here, I define a syntactic relation which corresponds to the semantic relation of “embeddability”. I suggest that the critical differences between the positivist account and van Fraassen's account have nothing to do with the distinction between semantics and syntax.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, John and MohséMachover (1977), A Course in Mathematical Logic. New York: North-Holland.
de Bouvère, Karel (1965), “Synonymous theories”. In The Theory of Models. Edited by J. W. Addison, Leon Henkin, and Alfred Tarski. New York: North-Holland. Pages 402–423.
Garner, L. E. (1981), An Outline of Projective Geometry. New York: North-Holland.
Hartshorne, R. (1967), Foundations of Projective Geometry. New York: W. A. Benjamin.
Rabin, Michael O. (1977), “Decidable theories”. In Handbook of Mathematical Logic. Edited by Jon Barwise. New York: North-Holland. Pages 595–629.
Schoenfield, Joseph R. (1967), Mathematical Logic. London: Addison-Wesley.
Sneed, Joseph (1971), The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Stegmüller, Wolfgang (1976), The Structure and Dynamics of Theories. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Suppe, F. (1974), The Structure of Scientific Theories. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Suppes, Patrick (1967), “What is a scientific theory?”. In Philosophy of Science Today. Edited by Sidney Morgenbesser. New York: Basic Books. Pages 55–67.
Thompson, Paul (1983), “The structure of evolutionary theory: a semantic approach”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 14: 215–229.
van Fraassen, Bas C. (1970), “On the extension of Beth's semantics of physical theories”, Philosophy of Science 37: 325–339.
van Fraassen, Bas C. (1980), The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turney, P. Embeddability, syntax, and semantics in accounts of scientific theories. J Philos Logic 19, 429–451 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263319
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263319