Skip to main content
Log in

Automated deduction in von Neumann-Bernays-Gödel set theory

  • Published:
Journal of Automated Reasoning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I present a new clausal version of NGB set theory, and compare my version with that first given by Boyer et al. [4]. A complete set of reductions for Boolean rings is given, derived from those of Hsiang [7]. I list over 400 theorems proved semiautomatically in elementary set theory, and supply the proofs of several of these, including Cantor's theorem. I present a semiautomated proof that the composition of homomorphisms is a homomorphism, thus solving a challenge problem given in [4]. Using the clauses and heuristics presented, there is no apparent obstacle to the semiautomated development of set theory through considerably more difficult theorems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bailin, S., ‘A λ-Unifiability Test for Set Theory’, Journal of Automated Reasoning 4(3), 269–286 (September 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernays, P., and Fraenkel, A., Axiomatic Set Theory, Amsterdam: North Holland (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bledsoe, W., ‘Splitting and Reduction Heuristics in Automatic Theorem Proving’, Artificial Intelligence 2(1), 57–78 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyer, R., Lusk, E., McCune, W., Overbeek, R., Stickel, M., and Wos, L., ‘Set Theory in First-Order Logic: Clauses for Gödel's Axioms’, Journal of Automated Reasoning 2(3), 287–327 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, C., and Lee, R., Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving, New York: Academic Press (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gödel, K., The Consistency of the Axiom of Choice and of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis with the Axioms of Set Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hsiang, J., ‘Refutational Theorem Proving using Term-Rewriting Systems’, Artificial Intelligence 25(3), 255–300 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Knuth, D., and Bendix, P., ‘Simple Word Problems in Universal Algebras’, in Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra, J. Leech (ed.), New York: Pergamon Press (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Loveland, D., Automated Theorem Proving: A Logical Basis, Amsterdam: North Holland (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lusk, E., and Overbeek, R., ‘Experiments with Resolution-Based Theorem-Proving Algorithms’, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 8(3), 141–152 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. McAllester, D., Ontic: A Knowledge Representation System for Mathematics, Cambridge: MIT Press (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. McCune, W., Otter 1.0 User's Guide, ANL-88/44, Argonne National Laboratory (1989).

  13. Mendelson, E., Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Third Edition, Monterey: Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moravec, H., Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson, J., ‘A Machine Oriented Logic Based on the Resolution Principle’, J. Assoc. Comp. Mach. 12, 23–41 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Quaife, A., ‘Automated Proofs of Löb's Theorem and Gödel's Two Incompleteness Theorems’, Journal of Automated Reasoning 4(2), 219–231 (June 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quaife, A., ‘Automated Development of Tarski's Geometry’, Journal of Automated Reasoning 5(1), 97–118 (March 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quine, W., ‘The Problem of Simplifying Truth Functions’, American Mathematical Monthly 59(8), 521–531 (October 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Suppes, P., Axiomatic Set. Theory, New York: Dover (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Winker, S., and Wos, L., ‘Procedure Implementation through Demodulation and Related Tricks’, Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Automated Deduction (ed.) D. Loveland, New York: Springer-Verlag (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wos, L., Overbeek, R., Lusk, E., and Boyle, J., Automated Reasoning, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wos, L., Automated Reasoning: 33 Basic Research Problems, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quaife, A. Automated deduction in von Neumann-Bernays-Gödel set theory. J Autom Reasoning 8, 91–147 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263451

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263451

Key words

Navigation