Summary
Two semi-linear models for lateral inhibition are discussed. The interaction between “receptor units” is assumed to be linear, as demonstrated by Hartline and Ratliff in the eye of the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus. Yet a model of such an inhibitory system must be nonlinear, since the output values correspond to nerve activities, which cannot be negativ. Models with forward inhibition were used often to describe contrast phenomena in the human nervous system. However, in order to simulate the input-output relation in systems similar to the eye of Limulus, a model with backward inhibition must be constructed. Two important properties of backward inhibition not shared by forward inhibition are: (1) Inhibition in a receptor unit has an influence upon its excitation, as well as upon its ability to inhibit other units (Disinhibition). (2) The range of interaction between sensory units is not necessarily the same as the range of direct cross connections. It is shown in this paper, that also forward inhibition may possess these two properties, provided that it is repeated on subsequent levels. Some properties of systems with backward and forward inhibition are studied and compared in models consisting of three units. The input-output relation for large systems with backward inhibition was calculated under special assumptions concerning the inhibitory coefficients. If the inhibitory coefficients in a system with backward inhibition decrease like a power series, as a function of the distance between receptor units, only neighboring receptors have an effect upon each other. That is, in an equivalent system with forward inhibition the inhibitory interaction is confined to neighbouring receptors. Conversely, when backward inhibition exists only between neighbouring receptors, the inhibitory coefficients in an equivalent system with forward inhibition are described, as a function of the distance between the receptor units, by a power series with alternating sign.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Alpern, M. and H. David: The Additivity of contrast in the human eye. J. gen. Physiol. 113, 109–136 (1959).
Békésy, G. v.: Neural inhibitory units of the eye and the skin. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 50, 1060–1070 (1960).
Bliss, I. C., and W. B. Macurdy: Linear models for contrast phenomena. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 51, 1373–1379 (1961).
Erulkar, S. D., and Marianne Fillenz: Single unit activity in the lateral geniculate body in the cat. J. Physiol. 154, 206–218 (1960).
Fessard, A.: Neuronal networks in communications within the brain. In: Sensory Communication, Ed. W. A. Rosenblith. 585–606, New York-London: M.I.T. Press and John Wiley & Sons 1961.
Hartline, H. K., F. Ratliff and W. H. Miller: Inhibitory interactions in the retina and its significance in vision. In: Nervous Inhibition, Ed. E. Florey. 241–284, Oxford-London-New York-Paris: Pergamon Press 1961.
Heinemann, E. G.: Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of inducing- and test-field luminances. J. exp. Psychol. 50, 89–96 (1955).
Kuffler, S. W.: Neurons in the retina: Organisation, inhibition and excitation problems. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 17, 281–292 (1961).
Kuffler, S. W.: Discharge patterns and functional organisation of mammalian retina. J. Neurophysiol. 16, 37–68 (1953).
Reichardt, W.: Über das optische Auflösungsvermögen von Limulus. Kybernetik 1, 57–69 (1961).
Reichardt, W., u.G. MacGinitie: Zur Theorie der lateralen Inhibition. Kybernetik 1, 155–165 (1962).
Rein, H., u. M. Schneider: Physiologie des Menschen, 12. Aufl., S. 549. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1956.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Von Vakjú, D. Vergleich zweier Modelle für laterale Inhibition. Kybernetik 1, 200–208 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290748
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290748