Summary
The conformational preferences of 12 molecular substructures in the crystalline state have been determined and compared with those predicted for relevant model compounds by ab initio molecular orbital calculations. Least-squares regression shows that there is a statistically significant correlation between the crystal-structure conformer distributions and the calculated potential-energy differences, even though the calculations relate to a gas-phase environment. Torsion angles associated with high strain energy (>1 kcal mol-1) appear to be very unusual in crystal structures and, in general, high-energy conformers are underrepresented in crystal structures compared with a gas-phase, room-temperature Boltzmann distribution. It is concluded that crystal packing effects rarely have a strong systematic effect on molecular conformations. Therefore, the conformational distribution of a molecular substructure in a series of related crystal structures is likely to be a good guide to the corresponding gas-phase potential energy surface.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allinger, N.L., Adv. Phys. Org. Chem., 13 (1976) 1.
Stewart, J.J.P., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 4 (1990) 1.
Hehre, W.J., Radom, L., Schleyer, P. v. R. and Pople, J.A., Ab initio Molecular Orbital Theory, Wiley, New York, NY, 1986.
Atkins, P.W., Molecular Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 1983.
Labanowski, J. and Andzelm, J. (Eds.) Density Functional Methods in Chemistry, Springer, Heidelberg, 1991.
Brock, C.P. and Minton, R.P., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111 (1989) 4586.
Almenningen, A., Bastiansen, O., Fernholt, L., Cyvin, B.N., Cyvin, S.J. and Samdal, S., J. Mol. Struct., 128 (1985) 59.
Kalman, A., Czugler, M. and Argay, G., Acta Crystallogr., B37 (1981) 868.
VanKonigsveld, H. and Jansen, J.C., Acta Crystallogr., B40 (1984) 420.
Ashida, T., Tsunogae, Y., Tanaka, I. and Yamane, T., Acta Crystallogr., B43 (1987) 212.
Ianelli, S., Musatti, A., Nardelli, M., Benassi, R., Folli, U. and Taddei, F., J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, (1992) 49.
Setzer, W.N. and Bentrude, W.G., J. Org. Chem., 56 (1991) 7212.
Nyburg, S.C. and Faerman, C.H., J. Mol. Struct., 140 (1986) 347.
Mullaley, A. and Taylor, R., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 135.
Gilli, G., Bertolasi, V., Bellucci, F. and Ferretti, V., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 108 (1986) 2420.
Klebe, G. and Mietzner, T., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 583.
Allen, F.H., Davies, J.E., Galloy, J.J., Johnson, O., Kennard, O., Macrae, C.F., Mitchell, E.M., Mitchell, G.F., Smith, J.M. and Watson, D.G., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 31 (1991) 187.
CSD User Manual, Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, Cambridge, U.K., 1992.
Guest, M.F. and Sherwood, P., GAMESS User's Guide, SERC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, U.K., 1990.
SYBYL, Tripos Associates, St. Louis, MO.
Bürgi, H.B. and Dunitz, J.D., Acta Crystallogr., B44 (1988) 445.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, F.H., Harris, S.E. & Taylor, R. Comparison of conformer distributions in the crystalline state with conformational energies calculated by ab initio techniques. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 10, 247–254 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355046
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355046