Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization and simplicity: Computational vision and biological explanation

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

David Marr's theory of vision has been a rich source of inspiration, fascination and confusion. I will suggest that some of this confusion can be traced to discrepancies between the way Marr developed his theory in practice and the way he suggested such a theory ought to be developed in his explicit metatheoretical remarks. I will address claims that Marr's theory may be seen as an “optimizing” theory, along with the attendant suggestion that optimizing assumptions may be inappropriate for cognitive mechanisms just as anti-adaptationists have argued they are inappropriate for other physiological mechanisms. I will discuss the nature of optimizing assumptions and theories. Considering various difficulties in identifying and assessing optimizing assumptions, I will suggest that Marr's theory is not purely an optimizing theory and that reaction to Marr on this issue prompts interesting considerations for the development of inter-disciplinary constraints in the cognitive and brain sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow, H. B.: 1972, ‘Single Units and Sensation: A Neuron Doctrine for Perceptual Psychology’, Perception 1, 371–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braitenberg, V.: 1984, Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R.: 1986, ‘A Robust Layered Control System for a Mobile Robot’, IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation RA-2, 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R.: 1991, ‘Intelligence Without Representation’, Artificial Intelligence 47, 1–3, 139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F. and J. Robson: 1968, ‘Application of Fourier Analysis to the Visibility of Gratings’, Journal of Physiology (London) 197, 551–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar, S.: 1987, Truth and Beauty, Aesthetics and Motivations in Science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.: 1983, ‘Intentional Systems in Cognitive Ethology: The “Panglossian Paradigm” Defended’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6, 343–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.: 1991, ‘Cognitive Science as Reverse Engineering: Several Meanings of “Top-Down” and “Bottom-Up”’, Presented August 10 at the 9th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science.

  • Dreher, B. and K. Sanderson: 1973, ‘Receptive Field Analysis: Responses to Moving Visual Contours by Single Lateral Geniculate Neurons in the Cat’, Journal of Physiology (London) 234, 95–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enroth-Cugel, C. and J. Robson: 1966, ‘The Contrast Sensitivity of Retinal Ganglion Cells of the Cat’, Journal of Physiology (London) 187, 517–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1974, ‘Special Sciences, or the Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis’, Synthese 28, 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, D.: 1992, ‘What's a Theory to do ... with Seeing? or Some Empirical Considerations for Observation and Theory’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43, 287–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J.: 1980, The Panda's Thumb. More Reflections in Natural History, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. and R. Lewontin: 1979, ‘The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme’, Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) B205, 581–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. B. C. and A. H. Cheetham: 1994, ‘Phylogeny Reconstruction and the Tempo of Speciation in Cheilostome Bryozoa’, Paleobiology 20, 407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, eds.: 1982, Judgements under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, R.: 1995, ‘Did Darwin Get It All Right?’, Science 267, 1421–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1988, ‘Marr's Computational Theory of Vision’, Philosophy of Science 55, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuffler, S. W.: 1953, ‘Discharge Patterns and Functional Organization of Mammalian Retina’, Journal of Neurophysiology 16, 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C. G., ed.: 1989, Artificial Life, the Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems: Held September, 1977 in Los Alamos, New Mexico, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leipnik, R.: 1960, ‘The Extended Entropy Uncertainty Principle’, Inf. Control 3, 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D.: 1982, Vision, Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D. and E. Hildreth: 1980, ‘Theory of Edge Detection’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B207, 187–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D. and S. Ullman: 1981, ‘Directional Selectivity and its Use in Early Visual Processing’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B211, 151–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClamrock, R.: 1995, Existential Cognition: Computational Minds in the World, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, D.: 1976, ‘Artificial Intelligence Meets Natural Stupidity’, SIGART Newsletter 57, 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, G. and H. Wilson: 1984, ‘Orientation Bandwidths of Spatial Mechanisms Measured by Masking’, Journal of the Optical Society of America 1(2), 226–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S.: 1982, ‘Review of Paul and Rouguel Busers' “Cerebral Correlates of Conscious Experience’, Perception 11, 363–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S.: 1985, ‘The Neurobiology of Perception’, Perception 14, 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodieck, R. and J. Stone: 1965, ‘Analysis of Receptive Fields of Cat Retinal Ganglion Cells’, Journal of Neurophysiology 28, 833–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker, P.: 1991, ‘The Quest for Optimality: A Positive Heuristic of Science?,’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, 205–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.: 1957, Models of Man, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.: 1981, The Sciences of the Artificial. 2nd ed. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1974, ‘Decision Making under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science 185, 1124–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, S.: 1979, ‘The Interpretation of Structure from Motion’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B203, 405–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F.: 1979, Principles of Biological Autonomy, Elsevier/North-Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. and P. Bourgine: 1992, ‘Introduction: Towards a Practice of Autonomous Systems’, in F. Varela and P. Bourgine (eds.), Towards a Practice of Autonomous Systems, MIT, Cambridge, Mass, pp. xi-xvii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, H. R., D. McFarlane, and G. Phillips: 1983, ‘Spatial Frequency Tuning of Orientation Selective Units Estimated by Oblique Masking’, Vision Research 23(9), 873–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, H. R. and J. Bergen: 1979, ‘A Four Mechanism Model for Spatial Vision’, Vision Research 19, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, H. R. and S. Giese: 1977, ‘Threshold Visibility of Frequency Gradient Patterns’, Vision Research 17, 1177–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.: 1986, ‘Heuristics and the Study of Human Behavior’, in D. Fiske and R. Shweder (eds.), Metatheory in Social Science: Pluralisms and Subjectivities, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Thanks are due to Ron McClamrock for his comments on previous drafts of this material. Also, early versions of some of the material in this paper were presented at LMPS '91 and at a Cognitive Studies Colloquium at Penn State University in 1992. Thanks to those in attendance, especially to Rich Carlson and Mark Detweiler, for their comments. Thanks, too, to an anonymous referee for suggesting several useful references.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilman, D. Optimization and simplicity: Computational vision and biological explanation. Synthese 107, 293–323 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413839

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413839

Keywords

Navigation