Abstract
Recently, a lot of papers have been published in the field of time series prediction using connectionist models. Nevertheless we think that one of the major problem with is rarely treated in the literature is related to the choice of input parameters (embedding dimension and delay). In this paper, we propose two modular approaches to this problem and apply them to a sunspot-related time series. Experimental results are then compared to a single multi-layer perceptron in order to estimate performances of these models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
F.Takens, “Detecting strange attractors in turbulence”, in D.A.Rand and L.-S.Young (eds) Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Vol. 898 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pp. 366–381, Warwick 1980, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1981.
D.E.Rumelhart, G.E.Hinton and R.J.Williams, “Learning internal representations by error propagation”, in D.E.Rummelhart and J.L.McClelland (eds) Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. 1, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1986.
M. Hu, “Application of the adaline system to weather forecasting”, Electrical Engineering Degree Thesis Technical Report 6775-1, Stanford Electronic Laboratory, 1964.
A. Lapedes and R. Farber, “Nonlinear signal processing using neural networks: prediction and system modelling”, Tech. Rep. LA-UR-87-2662, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Theoretical Division, 1987.
A.S.Weigend and N.A.Gershenfeld (eds), Time Series Prediction: Forecasting the Future and Understanding the Past, Addison-Wesley: Redwood City, CA, 1993.
H.Abarbanel, R.Brown, J.Sidorowich and L.Tsimring, “The analysis of observed chaotic data in physical systems”, Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 65, pp. 1331–1392, 1993.
A.Izenman, “J.R. Wolf and the Zürich sunspot relative numbers”, The Mathematical Intelligencer, Vol. 7, pp. 27–33, 1985.
A.S.Weigend, B.A.Huberman and D.E.Rumelhart, “Predicting sunspots and exchange rates with connectionist networks”, in M.Casdagli and S.Eubank (eds), Nonlinear Modeling and Forecasting, pp. 395–431, Addison Wesley: Reading, MA, 1992.
F. FogelmanSoulié, “Neural network architectures for pattern recognition”, in V.Cherkassky, J.Friedman and H.Wechster (eds) From Statistics to Neural Networks, Theory and Pattern Recognition Applications, pp. 243–262, Springer Verlag: Berlin, 1994.
R.A.Jacobs, M.I.Jordan, S.J.Nowlan and G.E.Hinton, “Adaptive mixtures of local experts”, Neural Computation, Vol. 3, pp. 79–87, 1991.
T.Meyer and N.Packard “Local forecasting of high-dimensional chaotic dynamics”, in M.Casdagli and S.Eubank (eds) Nonlinear Modeling and Forecasting, pp. 249–263, Addison Wesley: Reading, MA, 1992.
L.Xu, “Signal segmentation by finite mixture model and EM algorithm”in International Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, pp. 453–458, IEEE: Taiwan, 1994.
L.Xu, “Channel equalization by finite mixtures and the EM algorithm”, in V.F.Girosi, J.Makhoul, E.Manolakos and E.Wilson (eds) Neural Networks for Signal Processing, pp. 603–612, IEEE Press: New York, 1995.
J.Hamilton,“Analysis of time series subject to changes in regime”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 45, pp. 39–79, 1990.
H.Tong, Non-Linear Time Series Analysis: A Dynamical Systems Approach, Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1990.
Y.Bengio and P.Frasconi, “An input output HMM architecture”, in G.Tesauro, D.S.Touretzky and T.K.Leen (eds) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems: Proceedings of the 1994 Conference, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bengio, S., Fessant, F. & Collobert, D. Use of modular architectures for time series prediction. Neural Process Lett 3, 101–106 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571683
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571683