Abstract
The idea of supporting group meetings at the same time and at the same place by computer raises the problem of how salient features of group behaviors are understood in meetings. In this paper we take a critical look at several beliefs about group behaviors in research dealing with electronic meeting systems (EMS). The paper argues based on an empirical study that the concept of a small, cohesive business team, so widely held, in all EMS research is not necessarily a valid starting point in thinking of meeting support. In particular, the paper critically evaluates a number of beliefs of user aspects, group features such as composition, structure and protocols, and task characteristics such as nature, importance and meeting goals. In consequence, if these prominent features can vary markedly all meeting support cannot be designed in ways envisaged in current research. In conclusion we outline some research questions—both of empirical and constructive nature—that need to be addressed if the EMS research wants to address issues in computer support in groups that are not similar with business teams.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Applegate L.M., Konsynski B.R., Nunamaker J.F. (1986): A Group Decision Support System for Idea Generation and Issue Analysis in Organization Planning. InProceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Hawaii International Conference Systems Sciences.
Bannon L., Robinson M., (1991): Questioning representations. InProceedings of the 2nd. European Conference on Computer Supported Co-operative Work, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 219–234.
Benbasat I., Nault B. (1990): “An Evaluation of Empirical Research. In Managerial in Support Systems, Decision Support Systems”, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 203–226.
Benbasat I., DeSanctis G., Nault B.R. (1991): Empirical Research in Managerial Support Systems: A Review and Assessment. Presented atThe NATO Advanced Study Institute on Decision Support Systems in Italy, July 1991. Forthcoming in an edited book by Andrew Whinston.
Dennis A.R., Craig K.T., Vogel D.R., Nunamaker J.F.: An Evaluation of Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Strategic Management. InProceedings of the Eleventh ICIS, December 1990, Copenhagen, Denmark.
DeSanctis G., Gallupe R.B. (1987): A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems.Management Science, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 589–609.
DeSanctis G., Poole M.S., Lewis H., Desharnais G.: Using Computing in Quality Team Meetings: Initial Observations from the IRS-Minnesota Project.Journal of Management Information Systems, Winter 1991–92, vol. 8, no. 3.
DeSanctis G., Poole M.S., Dickson G.W., Jackson B.M. (1992): An Interpretative Analysis of Team Use of Group Technologies.Journal of Organizational Computing (in press 1992).
Ellis C. (1991): The Socialization of Computers. InProceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Collaborative Work, Social Communications and Information Systems, COSCIS'91, Helsinki, North-Holland.
Festinger L. (1968): Informal Social Communication. InD. Gartwright and A. Zander, Group Dynamics: research and Theory (3rd ed.), Harper and Row, New York.
Gallupe R.B., DeSanctis G., Dickson G. (1988): Computer-based support for group problem finding: An experimental investigation.Management Information Systems. Quarterly 12, pp 277–296.
Gray P. (1992): New Directions for Group Decision Support Systems”, InProceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 Working Conference on The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies on Information System Development, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 1992.
Grohowski R., McGoff C., Vogel D., Martz B., Nunamaker J. (1990): Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors.MIS Quarterly, December 1990. pp. 369–382.
Ho T.H., Raman K.S., Watson R.T. (1989): Group Decision Support Systems: The Cultural Factor. InProceedings of the Tenth Annual International Conference on Information Systems, December 1989, Boston, Mass.
Huber, George P. (1982): Group Decision Support Systems as Aids in the Use of Structured Group Management Techniques. 055-82 Conference Procs San Fransisco, pp. 96–108.
Jarvenpaa, S.L., Rao V.S., Huber G.P. (1988): Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment.MIS Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 645–666 (December 1988).
Johansen R. (1988):Groupware—computer support for business teams. Free Press, New York.
Jones M.R.: Information Technology for Group Decision Support: Beyond GDSS”, Journal of Organizational Computing, (in press 1992).
King J.L., Star S.L. (1990): Conceptual Foundations for the Development of Organizational Decision Support Systems. InNunamaker J. (ed), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, vol. 3, pp. 143–151, IEEE Press.
Kraemer K.L., King J.L. (1988): Computer-Based Systems for Cooperative Work and Group Decision Making.ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 115–146, June 1988.
Lyytinen K., Maaranen P, Knuuttila J. (1993): Unusual business or business as usual: an investigation of meeting support requirements in multilateral diplomacy.Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 97–119.
Lyytinen K., Ngwenyama O. (1992): What does computer support for cooperative work mean? A structurationnal analysis of computer supported cooperative work.Accounting, Management and Information Technologies vol 2, no 2, pp. 19–37.
Maaranen P., Lyytinen K., Knuuttila J.:Supporting Multilateral Diplomacy with Computers—the Helsinki Prototype System. Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of Jyväskylä, submitted for publication, 1993.
Mohrman A.M, Lawler E.E. (1985): Information Systems Technology and Organizations: A Review of Theory and Research. InThe Information Systems Research Challenge proc. ed. by F. Warren McFarlan Harvard Business School Press Boston, March 1985.
Morrison J., Sheng O.R.L (1992): Communication technologies and collaboration systems: Common domains, problems and solutions.Information & Management, vol. 23, no. 2, August 1992.
Nunamaker, J., Dennis A., Valacich J., Vogel D., George J.F. (1991a): Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work.Communications of the ACM, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 40–61 July 1991a.
Nunamaker, J., Dennis A., Valacich J., Vogel D. (1991b): Information Technology for Negotiating Groups: Generating Options For Mutual Gain.Management Science, vol. 37, no. 10, 1325–1346 October 1991b.
Nunamaker, J., Vogel D., Heminger A., Martz B., Grohowski R., McGoff C.: Group Support Systems in Practise: Experiences at IBM.In Proceedings of the 22nd Hawaii International Conference System Sciences, January 1989.
Pinsonneault A., Kraemer K.L. (1990): The effects of electronic meetings of group processes and outcomes: An assessment of the empirical research.European Journal of Operational Research 46, North-Holland, no. 2, pp. 143–161.
Post B.Q. (1992): Building the Business Case for Group Support Technology. InProceedings of HICSS 1992, Hawaii.
Robinson M. (1988): Computer Assisted Meetings: Modeling and Mirroring Organisational Systems. InH.J. Bullinger et al (eds), Information Technology for Organisational systems, North-holland elsevier. pp. 81–88.
Ruhleder K., King J. (1991): The Academic Collaboratory as a Bridge Accress Space, Time and Social Worlds. InThe 24th Proceedingss of HICSS IEEE Press.
Schwartzman H.B. (1986): The meeting as a neglected social form in organizational studies. InB.M. Staw andL.L. Cummings (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
Shaw M.E. (1976):Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Suchman L. (1993): Do Categories have Politics? The Language/Action Perspective Reconsidered. In:G. DeMichelis, C. simone and K. Schmidt (eds) Procs of the 3rd European Conference on Computer Supported Co-operative Work, Milan, 1993, 13–19.
Tatar D., Foster G., Bobrow D. (1991): Design for Conversation: lessons from Cognoter. InGreenberg S. (ed)CSCW groupware, London, Academic Press, pp. 55–129.
Weick K. (1984): Theoretical Assumptions and Research Methodology Selection. InMcFarlan W. (ed)The Information Systems Research Challenge Harvard Business School Press Boston, pp. 111–133.
Winslow R. (1992): ‘Computerizing’ Dull Meetings Is Touted As an Antidote to the Mouth That Bored. InThe Wall Street Journal. 28 January 1992, p. B1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was in part funded by the Academy of Finland.
The opinions presented in this work are not official statements of any of the participating organizations.
This research was in part funded by the Finnish Technology Development Center
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyytinen, K., Maaranen, P. & Knuuttila, J. Groups are not always the same. Comput Supported Coop Work 2, 261–284 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00805694
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00805694