Skip to main content
Log in

Connectionist visualisation of tonal structure

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some forms of artificial neural network models develop representations that have a high visual information content. An example of this kind of network is the Kohonen Feature Map (KFM). This paper describes how a KFM can be used in a model that categorises memorised sequential patterns of notes into representations of key and degrees of a musical scale. These patterns are derived from abstractions of musical sounds identified with pitch and interval. Both key and degree are important musical structures in the cognitive organisation of tonality. The acquisition of tonal organisation for music is analogous to the acquisition of language. The representations developed within the KFM form a map that can be seen to correspond directly with the images used by musicians to represent key relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, J. (1989). Aristotle. In Gregory, R. (ed.)The Oxford Companion to the Mind, 38–40 Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharucha, J. (1987). Music Cognition and Perceptual Facilitation: A Connectionist Framework.Music Perception 5(1): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bregman, A. (1990).Auditory Scene Analysis, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, G. & Grossberg, S. (1987). ART2: Self-Organization of Stable Category Recognition Codes for Analog Input Patterns.Applied Optics 26(23), 4919–4930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D. (1975). Facilitation by Repetition in Recognition Memory for Tonal Pitch.Memory and Cognition 3: 263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D. (1978). Delayed Pitch Comparisons and the Principle of Proximity.Perception and Psychophysics 23: 227–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, W. (1984). Assimilation and Tonal Structure: Comment on Castellano, Bharucha, and Krumhansl.Journal of Experimental Psychology 113(3): 417–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, W. (1988). Tonal Structure and Children's Early Learning of Music. In Sloboda, J. (ed.)Generative Processes in Music. Oxford University Press.

  • Gjerdingen, R. (1989a). Using Connectionist Models to Explore Complex Musical Pattern.Computer Music Journal 13(3): 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjerdingen, R. (1990). Categorisation of Musical Patterns by Self-Organizing Neuronlike Network.Music Perception 7(4): 339–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, N. (1993a). Modelling the Acquisition and Representation of Musical Tonality as a Function Of Pitch-Use through Self-Organising Artificial Neural Networks. PhD thesis, University of Exeter, Department of Computer Science. Unpublished.

  • Griffith, N. (1993b). Representing the Tonality of Musical Sequences Using Neural Nets. In Proceedings of TheFirst International Conference on Cognitive Musicology, 109–132. Jyväskylä, Finland.

  • Griffith, N. (1994). The Development of Tonal Centres and Abstract Pitch as Categorisations of Pitch-Use.Connection Science 6(3&4): 155–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, S. (1978). Behavioral Contrast in Short Term Memory: Serial Binary Memory Models or Parallel Continuous Memory Models.Journal of Mathematical Psychology 17: 199–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, G. E. (1989), Connectionist Learning Procedures.Artificial Intelligence 40: 185–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzmann, S. R. (1977). A Program for Key Determination.Interface.

  • Huron, D. & Parncutt, R. (1993). An Improved Key-Tracking Method Encorporating Pitch Salience and Echoing Memory.Psychomusicology.

  • Kohonen, T. (1989).Self-Organization and Associative Memory. Springer Verlag: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, C. (1990a),Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, C. (1990b). Tonal Hierarchies and Rate Intervals in Music Cognition.Music Perception 7: 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leman, M. (1990). Emergent Properties of Tonality Functions by Self-Organization.Interface 19: 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leman, M. (1992). The Theory of Tone Semantics: Concept, Foundation, and Application.Minds and Machines 2(4): 345–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longuet-Higgins, H. & Steedman, M. (1970). On Interpreting Bach.Machine Intelligence 6: 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parncutt, R. (1989).Harmony: Psychoacoustic Approach. Springer Verlag: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radeau, M. 91994). Auditory-Visual Spatial Interaction and Modularity.International Journal of Psychology.

  • Ritter, H. (1990). Self-Organizing Maps for Internal Representations.Psychological Research 52: 128–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. & Zipser, D. (1986). Feature Discovery by Competitive Learning. In Rumelhart, D. & McClelland, J. (eds.)Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1, Foundations, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. (1982). Geometric Approximations to the Structure of Musical Pitch.Psychological Review 89(4): 305–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. (1984). Ecological Constraints on Internal Representation: Resonant Kinematics of Perceiving, Imagining, Thinking, and Dreaming.Psychological Review 91: 417–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. (1987). Toward a Universal Law of Generalisation for Psychological Science.Science 237: 1317–1323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1968). Perception du pattern musical par auditeur.Science de l' art V(2): 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B. & Meredith, M. (1993).The Merging of the Senses, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stravinsky, I. (1970).The Poetics of Music. Harvard Press. Translated by Arthur Knodel and Ingolf Dahl.

  • Tattershall, G. (1989). Neural Map Applications. In Alexander I. (ed.)Neural Computing Architectures, Chapter 4. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhardt, E., Stoll, G. & Seewann, M. (1982a). Algorithm for Extraction of Pitch and Pitch Salience from Complex Tonal Signals.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73(3): 679–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhardt, E., Stoll, G. & Seewann, M. (1982b). Pitch of Complex Signals According to Virtual-pitch Theory: Test, Examples, and Predictions.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 71(3): 671–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, N. P. M. & Brown, G. (in press), Visualization of Rhythmic Structure.Artificial Intelligence Review, special issue onIntegration of Natural Language and Vision Processing, ed. Paul Mc Kevitt.

  • Ulrich, W. (1977). The Analysis and Synthesis of Jazz by Computer. In Proceedings ofThe 5th. IJCAI, 865–872.

  • Von der Malsburg, C. (1973). Self-Organizing of Orientation Sensitive Cells in the Striate Cortex.Kybernetic 14: 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. (1968). Linguistics and the Computer Analysis of Tonal Harmony.Journal of Music Theory 12(3): 2–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffith, N. Connectionist visualisation of tonal structure. Artif Intell Rev 8, 393–408 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849727

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849727

Key words

Navigation