Skip to main content
Log in

Automated reasoning in differential geometry and mechanics using the characteristic set method

Part II. Mechanical theorem proving

  • Published:
Journal of Automated Reasoning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We clarify the formulation problem of mechanical theorem proving in differential geometry and mechanics and propose two formulations. We present complete methods of mechanical theorem proving for the two formulations. We also introduce predicates and a language to translate geometry statements into differential polynomial equations. A program based on our methods has proved more than 100 nontrivial theorems in differential geometry and elementary mechanics including various classification theorems for space curves, Bertrand's Theorem, Newton's gravitational laws, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chou, S. C. and Gao, X. S., ‘Mechanical theorem proving in differential geometry, I. Space curves’, TR-89-08, Computer Sciences Department, The University of Texas at Austin (March, 1989).

  2. Chou, S. C. and Gao, X. S., ‘Mechanical theorem proving in differential geometry, II. Bertrand curves’, TR-90-09, Computer Sciences Department, The University of Texas at Austin (April, 1990).

  3. Chou, S. C. and Gao, X. S., ‘Automated reasoning in mechanics using Ritt-Wu's method’, TR-89-11, Computer Science Department, The University of Texas at Austin (April, 1989).

  4. Chou, S. C. and Gao, X. S., ‘Automated reasoning in differential geometry and mechanics using the characteristic set method, I. An improved version of Ritt-Wu's decomposition algorithm’,J. Automated Reasoning 10, 161–172 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chou, S. C. and Yang, Jingen, ‘On the algebraic formulation of certain geometry statements and mechanical geometry theorem proving’,Algorithmica 4, 237–262 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Diol, S., ‘Elimination in control theory’,Math. Control Signals Systems 4, 7–32 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferro, G. C. and Gallo, G., ‘A procedure to prove statements in differential geometries’,J. Automated Reasoning 6, 203–209 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ritt, J. F., ‘Differential equations from the algebraic standpoint’,Amer. Math. Soc. Colloquium 14 (1932).

  9. Ritt, J. F., ‘Differential algebra’,Amer. Math. Soc. Colloquium (1950).

  10. Seidenberg, A., ‘An elimination theory for differential algebra’,Univ. California Publication in Math. 3, 31–65 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, Wen-tsün, ‘A constructive theory of differential algebraic geometry’,Lect. Notes in Math., No. 1255, pp. 173–189, Springer-Verlag (1987).

  12. Wu, Wen-tsün, ‘Mechanical derivation of Newton's gravitational laws from Kepler's laws’, MM Research Preprints, No. 1, Inst. of Systems Science (1987).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The work reported here was supported in part by NSF Grants CCR-8702108 and CCR-9117870.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chou, SC., Gao, XS. Automated reasoning in differential geometry and mechanics using the characteristic set method. J Autom Reasoning 10, 173–189 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881835

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881835

Key words

Navigation