Skip to main content
Log in

The problem of hyperparamodulation

  • Basic Research Problems
  • Published:
Journal of Automated Reasoning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is the thirty-second of a series of articles discussing various open research problems in automated reasoning. The problem proposed for research asks one to find a variant of the inference rule hyperparamodulation that avoids generating many of the binary paramodulants ordinarily deduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, R.: Completeness results for E-resolution, inProc. AFIPS 1970 Spring Joint Computer Conference, vol. B36 (1970), pp. 653–656.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brand, D.: Proving theorems with the modification method,SIAM J. Computing 4 (1975), 412–430.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peterson, G. E.: A technique for establishing completeness results in theorem proving with equality,SIAM J. Computing 12 (1983), 82–100.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson, G. and Wos, L.: Paramodulation and theorem-proving in first-order theories with equality, in B. Meltzer and D. Michie (eds),Machine Intelligence 4, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 1969, pp. 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson, J.: Automatic deduction with hyper-resolution,Internat. J. Computer Math. 1 (1965) 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wos, L.:Automated Reasoning: 33 Basic Research Problems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wos, L. and McCune, W.: Negative hyperparamodulation, in J. Siekmann (ed),Proc. Eighth Internat. Conf. on Automated Deduction, Lecture Notes in Computer Sci., 230, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986, pp. 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wos, L., Overbeek, R., and Henschen, L.: Hyperparamodulation: A refinement of paramodulation, in R. Kowalski and W. Bibel (eds),Proc. Fifth Internat. Conf. on Automated Deduction, Lecture Notes in Computer Sci. 87, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980, pp. 208–219.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wos, L., Overbeek, R., Lusk, E., and Boyle, J.:Automated Reasoning: Introduction and Applications, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wos, L. and Robinson, G.: Maximal models and refutation completeness: Semidecision procedures in automatic theorem proving, in W. Boone, F. Cannonito, and R. Lyndon (eds),Word Problems: Decision Problems and the Burnside Problem in Group Theory, North-Holland, New York, 1973, pp. 609–639.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wos, L. and Robinson, G.: Paramodulation and set of support, inProc. IRIA Sympos. on Automatic Demonstration, Lecture Notes in Math. 125, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1970, pp. 276–310.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by the Office of Scientific Computing, U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wos, L. The problem of hyperparamodulation. J Autom Reasoning 12, 265–271 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881890

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881890

Key words

Navigation