Skip to main content
Log in

Book reviews

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brent, Michael R. (1989), ‘Temporal/Causal Connectives: Syntax and Lexicon’,Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (University of Michigan), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brent, Michael R. (1990), ‘A Simplified Theory of Tense Representations and Constraints on Their Composition’,Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (University of Pittsburgh), Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reichenbach, Hans (1947),The Elements of Symbolic Logic, New York: Free Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Biktimir, Tuvana (1986), ‘Impersonal Passives and theArAk Construction in Turkish’, in D.I. Slobin and K. Zimmer (eds.),Studies in Turkish Linguistics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chomsky, Noam (1981),Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chomsky, Noam (1986),Barriers, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Comrie, Bernard and Thompson, Sandra (1985), ‘Complex Nominalizations’, in T. Shopen (ed.),Language Typology and Linguistic Description, Vol. III:Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, pp. 349–398.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dixon, R.M.W. (1972),The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dowty, David (1979),Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jackendoff, Ray (1983),Semantics and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nunes, Mary (1992), ‘Argument Linking in English Derived Nominals’, in R. Van Valin (ed.),Advances in Role and Reference Grammar, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van Valin, Robert (1991), ‘Another Look at Icelandic Case Marking and Grammatical Relations’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, pp. 145–194.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Valin, Robert and Wilkins, David (1992), ‘Predicting Syntactic Structure from Semantic Representations:Remember in English and its Equivalents in Mparntwe Arrernte’, in R. Van Valin (ed.),Advances in Role and Reference Grammar, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, in press.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Davidson, Donald (1967), ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in N. Rescher (ed.),The Logic of Decision and Action, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dowty, David (1979),Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Boston: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hinrichs, Erhard (1983), ‘The Semantics of the English Progressive: A Study in Situation Semantics,’ inProceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 19, 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pustejovsky, James (1992), ‘The Syntax of Event Structure’,Cognition 41, 47–81.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Alterman, Richardet al. (1991), ‘An Architecture for Understanding in Planning, Action, and Learning,’SIGART Bulletin 2(4), 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brachman, Ronald J., and Levesque, Hector J. (1985),Readings in Knowledge Representation, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dreyfus, Hubert L. (1985), ‘From Micro-Worlds to Knowledge Representation: AI at an Impasse,’ in R. J. Brachman and H. J. Levesque (eds.),Readings in Knowledge Representation, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harnad, Stevan (1990), ‘The Symbol Grounding Problem,’Physica D 42(1–3), 335–346.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heisenberg, Werner (1930), ‘The Uncertainty Principle,’ in J. R. Newman (ed.),The World of Mathematics, (Redmond, WA: Tempus Books, 1988), 1029–1033.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Putnam, Hilary (1981),Reason, Truth, and History, Cambridge, Eng., Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rapaport, William J. (1988), ‘Syntactic Semantics: Foundations of Computational Natural-Language Understanding,’ in J. H. Fetzer (ed.),Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 81–131.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosch, Eleanor (1981), ‘Prototype Classification and Logical Classification: The Two Systems,’ in E. Scholnick (ed.),New Trends in Cognitive Representation, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Searle, John R. (1980), ‘Minds, Brains, and Programs,’Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 417–457.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson, Manley (1967), ‘Categories,’ in P. Edwards (ed.),Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York: Macmillan and Free Press, Vol. 2, pp. 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

Reference

  1. Boas, Franz (1911), “Introduction,”Handbook of American Indian Language (Bulletin of American Ethnology), B40, Part 1, Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution, pp. 1–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almeida, M.J., Van Valin, R.D., Moens, M. et al. Book reviews. Mind Mach 4, 103–128 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974207

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974207

Navigation