Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Discursive logic towards a logic of rational discourse

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both logic and philosophy of science investigate formal aspects of scientific discourse, i.e. properties of (non-monotonic) consequence operations for discursive logic. In the present paper we handle two of them: paraconsistency and enthymematycity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fuhrmann, André, 1991, ‘Theory contraction through base contraction’Journal of Philosophical Logic 20, 175–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girle, Roderic A., 1991, ‘Communication and Uncertainty’, TR-ARP-3/91 Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University (March).

  • Jacquette, Dale, 1991, ‘Contradiction’, unpublished script.

  • Jaśkowski, Stanisław, 1948, ‘Rachunek zdań dla systemów dedukcyjnych sprzecznych’,Studia Societatis Scientiarum Torunensis vol.1, No 5, Sectio A, 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, Ingebrigt, 1936, ‘Der Minimalkalkül, ein reduzierter intuitionistischer Formalismus’,Compositio Mathematica 4, 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukasiewicz, Jan, 1987,O zasadzie sprzeczności u Arystotelesa, PWN Warszawa.

  • Makinson, David, und Peter Gärdenfors, 1991, ‘Relations between the logic of theory change and nonmonotonic logic’, in: Andrè Fuhrmann und Michael Morreau (Hrsg.)The logic of theory change, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstraß, Jürgen, (Hrsg.), 1980,Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wisenschaftstheorie, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim/Wien/Zürich.

  • Priest, Graham, and Richard Routley, 1989, ‘First Historical Introduction: A Preliminary History of Paraconsistent and Dialethic Approaches’, in:Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent (eds.: Graham Priest et al.), Philosophia München, 3–75.

  • Priest, Graham, and Richard Routley, 1989a, ‘Systems of Paraconsistent Logic’, in:Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent (eds.: Graham Priest et al.), Philosophia München, 151–186.

  • Stelzner, Werner, 1984,Epistemische Logik — Zur logischen Analyse von Akzeptationsformen, Akademie-Verlag Berlin.

  • Urbas, Igor, 1990, ‘Paraconsistency’,Studies in Soviet Though 39, 343–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urchs, Max, 1987, ‘Gewißheitsmaße auf Kripkestrukturen’,Logik in der Semantik — Semantik in der Logik (ed.: Evelyn Dölling), AdW der DDR.

  • Urchs, Max, 1990, ‘Parakonsistenz in schwachen Modalkalkülen’,Konstanzer Berichte zur Logik und Wissenschaftstheorie 11.

  • Winograd, Terry, 1989, ‘Reply to Djikstra’,Communications of the ACM (December), 1412–1413.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chair of Logic Collegium Maius, Nicolas Copernicus University, PL-87-100, Toruń

    Max Urchs

Authors
  1. Max Urchs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Supported by grants from the Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, form the Fulbright-Foundation and from the Center for Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Urchs, M. Discursive logic towards a logic of rational discourse. Stud Logica 54, 231–249 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063153

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063153

Keywords

Search

Navigation