Skip to main content
Log in

On the role of continuously differentiable exact penalty functions in constrained global optimization

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show that the new continuously differentiable exact penalty functions recently proposed in literature can play an important role in the field of constrained global optimization. In fact they allow us to transfer ideas and results proposed in unconstrained global optimization to the constrained case.

First, by drawing our inspiration from the unconstrained case and by using the strong exactness properties of a particular continuously differentiable penalty function, we propose a sufficient condition for a local constrained minimum point to be global.

Then we show that every constrained local minimum point satisfying the second order sufficient conditions is an “attraction point” for a particular implementable minimization algorithm based on the considered penalty function. This result can be used to define new classes of global algorithms for the solution of general constrained global minimization problems. As an example, in this paper we describe a simulated annealing algorithm which produces a sequence of points converging in probability to a global minimum of the original constrained problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. C. W. Dixon and G. P. Szegö (1975),Towards Global Optimization 1, North-Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. C. W. Dixon and G. P. Szegö (1978),Towards Global Optimization 2, North-Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Archetti and F. Shoen (1984), A Survey on the Global Optimization Problems: General Theory and Computational Approaches,Annals of Operations Research 1, 87–110.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Törn and A. Žilinskas (1989),Global Optimization, Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 350.

  5. A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan and G. H. Timmer (1989), Global Optimization, in G. L. Nemhauser, A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, and M. J. Todd (eds.),Optimization, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Gabrielsen (1986), Global Maxima of Real-Valued Functions,Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 50, 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. M. Pardalos and J. B. Rosen (1986), Methods for Global Concave Optimization: A Bibliografic Survey,SIAM Review 28, 367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. M. Pardalos and J. B. Rosen (1987),Constrained Global Optimization, Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 268, 198.

  9. R. Horst and H. Tuy (1990),Global Optimization. Deterministic Approaches, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. T. Timmer (1984), Global Optimization: A Stochastic Approach, Ph.D. Dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam.

  11. A. V. Levy and S. Gomez (1984), The Tunneling Algorithm Applied to Global Optimization, in P. T. Boggs, R. H. Byrd, and R. B. Schnabel (eds.),Numerical Optimization 1984 (SIAM Philadelphia), pp. 213–244.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Palosaari, S. Parviainem, J. Hiironen, J. Reunanen, and P. Neittaanmäki (1986), A Random Search Algorithm for Constrained Global Optimization,Acta Polytech. Scand., Ch. Techn. and Metallurgy Ser. 172, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. N. Neifiodov (1987), The Search of the Global Maximum of a Function of Several Variables on a Set Denned by Inequality Bounds,Comp. Math. and Math. Phys. 27(1), 35–51. (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Di Pillo and L. Grippo (1986), An Exact Penalty Method with Global Convergence Properties for Nonlinear Programming Problems,Math. Prog. 36, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Lucidi (1992), New Results on a Continuously Differentiable Exact Penalty Function,SIAM J. on Optimization 2, 558–574.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Lucidi and M. Piccioni (1989), Random Tunneling by Means of Acceptance-Rejection Sampling for Global Optimization,J. Optim. Theory and Appl. 62, 255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Lucidi (1989), New Results on a Continuously Differentiable Exact Penalty Function, Tech. Rep. R. 277, Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi ed Informatica del CNR, Roma, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Di Pillo and L. Grippo (1985), A Continuously Differentiable Exact Penalty Function for Nonlinear Programming Problems with Inequality Constraints,SIAM J. Control and Optimization 23, 72–84.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. P. Bertsekas (1982),Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. Aluffi-Pentini, V. Parisi, and F. Zirilli (1985), Global Optimization and Stochastic Differential Equations,J. Optim. Theory Appl. 47, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Piccioni (1987),A Combined Multistart-Annealing Algorithm for Continuous Global Optimization, Systems Research Center, University of Maryland, Tech. Res. Rep. 87-45.

  22. S. German and C.-R. Hwang (1986), Diffusions for Global Optimization,SIAM J. Control and Optimization 24, 1031–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Y. Rubinstein (1981),Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method, John Wiley & Son, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. J. Solis and R. J. B. Wets (1981), Minimizations by Random Search Techniques,Math. of Oper. Res. 6, 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. C. Karnopp (1963), Random Search Techniques for Optimization Problems,Automatica 1, 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Törn (1978), A Search Clustering Approach to Global Optimization, in L. C. W. Dixon and G. P. Szegö (eds.),Towards Global Optimization 2, North-Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Zielinski (1981), A Statistical Estimate of the Structure of Multiextremal Problems,Math. Prog. 21, 348–356.

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. Betro (1984), Bayesian Testing of Nonparametric Hypotheses and its Application to Global Optimization,J. Optim. Theory and Appl. 42, 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. Betro and F. Schoen (1987), Sequential Stopping Rules for the Multistart Algorithm in Global Optimization,Math. Prog. 38, 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. G. E. Boender and A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan (1987), Bayesian Stopping Rules for Multistart Global Optimization Methods,Math. Prog. 37, 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lucidi, S. On the role of continuously differentiable exact penalty functions in constrained global optimization. J Glob Optim 5, 49–68 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01097003

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01097003

Key words

Navigation