Skip to main content
Log in

A cognitive load application in tutoring

  • Published:
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on intelligent tutoring systems has mainly concentrated on how to reduce a cognitive load which a student will bear in learning a domain. This load reduction approach contributes to facilitating his/her learning. However the approach often fails to reinforce the student's comprehension and retention. Another approach to tutoring is to apply a load to him/her purposefully. In this paper, we present a framework for cognitive load application and describe a demonstration system. The framework imposes a load on a student who tries to understand an explanation. The important point toward the load application is to provide the student with an optimal load that does not go beyond his/her capacity for understanding. This requires controlling the student's load by means of explanations. In order to implement such load control, it is necessary to estimate how much load the explanation imposes on his/her understanding process. The load estimate depends on his/her understanding capability since the same explanation imposes a different load according to the capability. Therefore a student model representing his/her capability is required. This paper shows how our system accomplishes a proper load application by generating explanations with the load estimate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barr, A., M. Beard and R.C. Atkinson: 1976, ‘The Computer as a Tutorial Laboratory: The Stanford BIP Project’.Man-Machine Studies 8, 567–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, A.E. and D. Atkins: 1993, ‘Audio Instruction in Multimedia Education: Is Textual Redundancy Important?’. ED-MEDIA '93, Orlando, 39–46.

  • Carroll, J., R. Mack, C. Lewis, N. Grischkowsky and S. Robertson: 1985, ‘Exploring Exploring a Word Processor’.Human-Computer Interaction 1, 283–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawsey, A: 1991, ‘Generating Interactive Explanations’. Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Anaheim, California, 86–91.

  • Chan, T.W., C.C. Lin, S.J. Lin and H.C. Kuo: 1993, ‘OCTR: A Model of Learning Stages’. Artificial Intelligence in Education '93, Edinburgh, Scotland, 257–264.

  • Charney, D.H. and L.M. Reder: 1986, ‘Designing Interactive Tutorials for Computer Users’.Human-Computer Interaction 2, 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H. and K. VanLehn: 1989, ‘Self-explanations: How students study use examples in learning to solve problems’.Cognitive Science,13, 145–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H., N. Leeuw, M.H. Chiu and C. LaVancher: 1994, ‘Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding’,Cognitive Science 18, 439–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halff, H.M: 1988, ‘Curriculum and Instruction in Automated Tutors’. In: Polson, M.C. and J.J. Richardson (eds.):Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 79–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashihara, A., T. Hirashima and J. Toyoda: 1993, ‘Impasse-oriented Explanation Planning Based on Explanation Effect Model’. HCI International '93, Orlando, p. 150.

  • Kashihara, A., K. Matsumura, T. Hirashima and J. Toyoda: 1994, ‘Load-Oriented Tutoring to Enhance Student's Explanation Understanding’.IEICE Transactions on Inf. & Syst. E77-D(1), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashihara, A., A. Sugano, K. Matsumura, T. Hirashima and J. Toyoda: 1994, ‘A Cognitive Load Application Approach to Tutoring’. Fourth International Conference on User Modeling, Cape Code, 163–168.

  • Minsky, M.: 1975, ‘A framework for representing knowledge’. In: P. Winston (eds.):The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.D. and W.R. Swartout: 1990, ‘Pointing: A Way Toward Explanation Dialogue’. Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Boston, 457–464.

  • Reder, L., D. Charney and K. Morgan: 1986, ‘The Role of Elaborations in Learning a Skill from an Instructional Text’,Memory and Cognition 14, 64–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D., B. Woolf and M. Cornell: 1992, ‘Steps from Explanation Planning to Model Construction Dialogue’. Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, Calif., 24–30.

  • Suthers, D.: 1994, ‘Strategies for Sequencing as a Planning Task’. Seventh International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Kennebunkport, Maine, 29–36.

  • VanLehn, K.: 1988, ‘Toward a Theory of Impasse-Driven Learning’. In: H. Mandl and H. Lesgold (eds.):Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems, New York: Springer-Verlag, 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E.: 1987,Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring systems. Los Altos, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kashihara, A., Hirashima, T. & Toyoda, J. A cognitive load application in tutoring. User Model User-Adap Inter 4, 279–303 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099822

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099822

Key words

Navigation