Skip to main content
Log in

A reformulation-convexification approach for solving nonconvex quadratic programming problems

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the class of linearly constrained nonconvex quadratic programming problems, and present a new approach based on a novel Reformulation-Linearization/Convexification Technique. In this approach, a tight linear (or convex) programming relaxation, or outer-approximation to the convex envelope of the objective function over the constrained region, is constructed for the problem by generating new constraints through the process of employing suitable products of constraints and using variable redefinitions. Various such relaxations are considered and analyzed, including ones that retain some useful nonlinear relationships. Efficient solution techniques are then explored for solving these relaxations in order to derive lower and upper bounds on the problem, and appropriate branching/partitioning strategies are used in concert with these bounding techniques to derive a convergent algorithm. Computational results are presented on a set of test problems from the literature to demonstrate the efficiency of the approach. (One of these test problems had not previously been solved to optimality). It is shown that for many problems, the initial relaxation itself produces an optimal solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Khayyal, F. A. and J. E. Falk (1983), Jointly Constrained Biconvex Programming,Math, of Oper. Res. 8, 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Khayyal, F. A. and C. Larson (1990), Global Minimization of a Quadratic Function Subject to a Bounded Mixed Integer Constraint Set,Annals of Operations Research 25, 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balas, E. (1975), Nonconvex Quadratic Programming via Generalized Polars,SIAM Journal on Applied Math. 28, 335–349.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benacer, R. and PhamDinh, Tao (1986), Global Maximization of a Nondefinite Quadratic Function over a Convex Polyhedron, pp. 65–76, inFermat Days 85: Mathematics for Optimization, J. B. Hiriart-Urruty (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bomze, I. M. (1992), Copositivity Conditions for Global Optimality Indefinite Quadratic Programming Problems,Czechoslovak Journal for Operations Research 1, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher, M. L. (1981), The Lagrangian Relaxation Methods for Solving Integer Programming Problems,Management Science 27, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Floudas, C. A. and P. M. Parsalos (1990),A Collection of Test Problems for Constrained Global Optimization Algorithms, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Floudas, C. A. and V. Visweswaran (1990), A Global Optimization Algorithm (GOP) for Certain Classes of Nonconvex NLP's-1. Theory,Computers and Chemical Engineering 14, 1419.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Floudas, C. A. and V. Visweswaran (1993), A Primal-Relaxed Dual Global Optimization Approach: Theory,JOTA 78, 187–225.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Golub, G. H. and C. F. Van Loan (1989),Matrix Computations, Second Edition, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guignard, M. and S. Kim (1987), Lagrangian Decomposition: A Model Yielding Stronger Lagrangian Bounds,Mathematical Programming 39, 215–228.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hansen, P., B. Jaumard, and S. Lu (1991), An Analytical Approach to Global Optimization,Math. Programming 52, 227–254.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kough, P. F., The Indefinite Quadratic Programming Problem,Operations Research 27(3), 516–533.

  14. Larsson, T. and Z. Liu (1989), A Primal Convergence Result for Dual Subgradient Optimization with Applications to Multicommunity Network Flows, Research Report, Department of Mathematics, Linkoping Institute of Technology, S-581 83, Linkoping, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Manas, M. (1968), An Algorithm for a Nonconvex Programming Problem,Econ Math Obzor Acad. Nad. Ceskoslov 4(2), 202–212.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meyer, G. G. (1988), Convergence of Relaxation Algorithms by Averaging,Mathematical Programming 40, 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mueller, R. K. (1970), A Method for Solving the Indefinite Quadratic Programming Problem,Management Science 16(5), 333–339.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Murtagh, B. A. and M. A. Saunders (1987), MINOS 5.1 User's Guide, Technical Report Sol 83-20R, Systems Optimization Laboratory, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Muu, L. D. and W. Oettli (1991), An Algorithm for Indefinite Quadratic Programming with Convex Constraints,Operations Research Letters 10, 323–327.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pardalos, P. M. (1991), Global Optimization Algorithms for Linearly Constrained Indefinite Quadratic Programs,Computers Math. Applic. 21, 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pardalos, P. M., J. H. Glick, and J. B., Rosen (1987), Global Minimization of Indefinite Quadratic Problems,Computing 39, 281–291.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pardalos, P. M. and J. B. Rosen (1987),Constrained Global Optimization: Algorithms and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pardalos, P. M. and S. A. Vavasis (1991), Quadratic Programming with One Negative Eigenvalue Is NP-Hard,Journal of Global Optimization 1, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Phillips, A. T. and J. B. Rosen (1990), Guaranteedɛ-Approximate Solution for Indefinite Quadratic Global Minimization,Naval Research Logistics 37, 499–514.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ritter, K. (1966), A Method for Solving Maximum Problems with a Nonconcave Quadratic Objective Function,Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie,4, 340–351.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sherali, H. D. and A. R. Alameddine (1992), A New Reformulation-Linearization Technique for Bilinear Programming Problems,Journal of Global Optimization 2(3), 379–410.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sherali, H. D. and D. C. Myers (1985/6), The Design of Branch and Bound Algorithms for a Class of Nonlinear Integer Programs,Annals of Oper. Res. 5, 463–484.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sherali, H. D. and C. H. Tuncbilek (1992), A Global Optimization Algorithm for Polynomial Programming Problems Using a Reformulation-Linearization Technique,The Journal of Global Optimization 2, 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sherali, H. D. and O. Ulular (1989), A Primal-Dual Conjugate Subgradient Algorithm for Specially Structured Linear and Convex Programming Problems,Appl. Math. Optim. 20, 193–221.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tuncbilek, C. H. (1994),Polynomial and Indefinite Quadratic Programming Problems: Algorithms and Applications, PhD Dissertation, Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

  31. Tuy, H. (1987), Global Minimization of a Difference of Two Convex Functions,Mathematical Programming Study 30, 150–182.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vavasis, S. A. (1992), Approximation Algorithms for Indefinite Quadratic Programming,Mathematical Programming 57, 279–311.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Visweswaran, V. and C. A. Floudas, (1993), New Properties and Computational Improvement of the GOP Algorithm for Problems with Quadratic Objective Function and Constraints,Journal of Global Optimization 3, 439–462.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zwart, P. B. (1973), Nonlinear Programming: Counterexamples to Two Global Optimization Algorithms,Operations Research 21(6), 1260–1266.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sherali, H.D., Tuncbilek, C.H. A reformulation-convexification approach for solving nonconvex quadratic programming problems. J Glob Optim 7, 1–31 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01100203

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01100203

Key words

Navigation