Skip to main content
Log in

Mediation and communication of information in the cultural interface

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In man-machine communication, there is a relationship between what may be described as tacit (human) and explicit (machine) knowledge. The tacit lies in practice and the explicit in the formulation of the processes and content of this practice. However, when a human communicates with another human face to face, we may describe them as communicating aspects of the tacit and explicit dimension of their knowledge, i.e. the expression and its background of meaning for the particular situation. When this is unsuccessful in being communicated, some mediator (not necessarily a third person) is needed to provide the bridge for the particular discrepant aspects of the tacit and explicit dimensions to meet. This is achieved by making the tacit nature of the discrepancy in the communication explicit to both participants such that they both understand the background to their discrepancy. Once they become aware, it is possible for them to begin to resolve it.

In considering what has been termed here the ‘cultural interface’, i.e. communication across cultures, the paper will explore the nature of discrepancies in communication and the means by which we can accommodate to each other's differences, either via third party help or between ourselves. The interaction of each person's tacit (background of practices) and their interpretation, set against this background, of the explicit (the utterance, silence, gesture) needs to find some mutual ground, involving their cultural self. The operation of mediation and negotiation will be considered in this context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abric, J.C. (1982). Cognitive Processes Underlying Cooperation: The Theory of Social Representation. In Derlega and Grzelak, 73–94.

  • Arunachalam, V. (1991). Decision Aiding in Multi-party Transfer Negotiation: The Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication and Structured Interaction. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L.W. (1998). The Content and Organisation of Autobiographical Memories. In Neisser, U. and Winograd, E. (eds) Remembering Reconsidered: Ecological and Traditional Approaches to the Study of Memory. Cambridge University Press, New York, 193–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodt, S.E. (1990). Inside Information and Negotiator Decision Behaviour. In3rd Annual Meeting of the International Association of Conflict Management, Vancouver, BC.

  • Carnevale, P.J. and Pruitt, D.G. (1992). Negotiation and Mediation,Annual Review of Psychology.43. 531–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (1993). An Advocate's View. In Faure, G.O. and Rubin, J.Z. (eds) Culture and Negotiation. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, M.J.E. (1987). Architect or Bee: The Human Price of Technology. Hogarth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culnan, M.J. and Markus, M.L. (1987). Information Technologies. In Jablin, F.M., Putnam, L.L., Roberts, K.H. and Porter, L.W. (eds)Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 191–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1982). Interdependence and Psychological Orientation. In Derlega and Grzelak 15–42.

  • Ehn, P. (1998). Work Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Arbetlivscentrum, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ess, C. and Sudweeks, F. (1998). Proceedings of Cultural Attitudes Towards Technology and Communication, London, 1–3 August 1998. University of Sydney.

  • Faure, G.O. and Rubin, J.Z. (1993). Culture and Negotiation. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G. (1988). Mindsets. Intercultural Press, Yarmouth, ME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A.P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. and Nisbett, R. (1997). The Cultural Matrix of Social Psychology. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S.T. and Lindzey, G. (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology. McGraw Hill, 915–981

  • Geertz, C. (1993). The Interpretation of Cultures. Fontana Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, K.S. (ed.) (1996). Human Machine Symbiosis: The Foundations of Human-Centred Design. Springer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S.P. (1998). The Cultural Interface: The Role of Self. In Ess, C. and Sudweeks, F. (eds)Proceedings of Cultural Attitudes towards Technology and Communication, London, 1–3 August 1998. University of Sydney.

  • Good, D. (1996). Patience and Control: The Importance of Maintaining the Link Between Producers and Users. In Gorayska, B. and Mey, J.L. (eds)Cognitive Technology: In Search of a Human Interface. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorayska, B. and Mey, J.L. (1996). Cognitive Technology,AI & Society Special Issue.10(3, 4).

  • Gudykunst, W.B. and Kim, Y.Y. (1984). Communicating with Strangers: An approach to Intercultural Communication. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T., Heiman, C.P. and Zanna, M.P. (eds) (1981). Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hongladarom, S. (1998). Global Culture, Local Cultures, and the Internet: The Thai example. In Ess, C. and Sudweeks, F. (eds)Proceedings: Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology '98. University of Sydney.

  • Kazuo, O. (1979). How the ‘Inscrutables’ Negotiate with the ‘Inscrutables’: Chinese Negotiating Tactics vis-à-vis the Japanese,China Quarterly.79. 529–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. and McGuire, T. (1984). Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication,American Psychologist.39. 1123–1134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klukhon, C. (1951). The Study of Culture. In Lerner, D. and Laswell, H.D. (eds)The Policy Sciences. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 86–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kressel, K. (1972). Labor Mediation: An Exploratory Survey. Association of Labor Mediation Agencies, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kressel, K. and Pruitt, D.G. (eds) (1985). Mediation Research. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. and Kluckhman, C. (1963). Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. (1997). Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures,Organization Studies.18(6). 973–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, R.G. and Carnevale, P.J. (1990). Contingencies in the Mediation of Disputes,Journal of Personal and Social Psychology.58. 259–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, R. (1996). Computer-Mediated Conversations as a New Dimension of Intercultural Communication between East Asian and North American College Students. In Herring, S. (ed.)Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives.

  • McLaughlin, M., Carnevale, P.J. and Lim, R. (1991). Professional Mediators Judgements of Mediators Tactics: MDS and Clustering Analyses,Applied Psychology.76. 465–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazawa, K, Gill, S.P. and Nojima, H. (1999). The Influence of the Internet on Japanese Education: Case of the 100 Schools Networking Project. InProceedings of IWS '99, Osaka, Japan.

  • Nojima, H. (1994). Social and Cultural Aspects of Human and Computer Networks: Japanese Perspective. InProceedings of Conference on New Visions of Post-Industrial Society, University of Brighton, UK.

  • Nojima, H. and Gill, S.P. (1997). Cultural Differences in Evaluative Communication. InProceedings of the Second Conference of The Asian Association of Social Psychology, Kyoto, Japan.

  • Okamura, K, Fujimoto, M., Orlikowski, W.J. and Yates, J. (1995). Helping CSCW Applications Succeed: The Role of Mediators in the Context of Use,The Information Society.11. 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauner, F., Rasmussen, L.B. and Corbett, M. (1988). The Social Shaping of Technology and Work,AI & Society.2. 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, F., Ball, L.J., Morley, A.M. and Evans, J.St.B.T. (1997). Styles of Group Discussion in Computer-Mediated Decision Making,British Journal of Social Psychology.36. 241–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salacuse, J.W. (1993). Implications for Practitioners. In Faure, G.O. and Rubin, J.Z. (eds)Culture and Negotiation. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M.R. (1987). Intercultural Communication: A Perceptual Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New Ways of Working in a Networked Organisation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, S.G. and McGrath, J.E. (1994). Does the Medium Matter? The Interaction of Task Type and Technology on Group Performance and Member Reactions,Applied Psychology.79. 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S.E. and Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic Bases of Social Information Processing. In Higgins, E.T., Heiman, C.P. and Zanna, M.P. (eds)Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 89–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touval, S. and Zartman, I.W. (1985). International Mediation in Theory and Practice. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H.C. (1989). The Self and Social Behaviour in Differing Cultural Contexts. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and Semantic Memory. In Tulving, S. and Donaldson, W. (eds) Organisation of memory. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,Science.185. 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, J.A. (1981). Mediation: An Analysis, Review, and Proposed Research,Journal of Conflict Resolution.21. 459–474.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satinder P. Gill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gill, S.P. Mediation and communication of information in the cultural interface. AI & Soc 13, 218–234 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01174778

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01174778

Keywords

Navigation