Skip to main content
Log in

A new technique for inconsistent QP problems in the SQP method

  • Published:
Mathematical Methods of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Successful treatment of inconsistent QP problems is of major importance in the SQP method, since such occur quite often even for well behaved nonlinear programming problems. This paper presents a new technique for regularizing inconsistent QP problems, which compromises in its properties between the simple technique of Pantoja and Mayne [36] and the highly successful, but expensive one of Tone [47]. Global convergence of a corresponding algorithm is shown under reasonable weak conditions. Numerical results are reported which show that this technique, combined with a special method for the case of regular subproblems, is quite competitive to highly appreciated established ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burke JV (1989) A sequential quadratic programming algorithm for potentially infeasible mathematical programs. J. Math. Anal. Applies 139:319–351

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burke JV (1992) A robust trust region algorithm for constrained nonlinear programming problems. SIOPT 2:325–347

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burke JV (1991) An exact penalization viewpoint of constrained optimization. SIAM J. Control and Optimization 29:968–998

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burke JV, Han SP (1989) A robust sequential quadratic programming method. Math. Prog. 43:277–303

    Google Scholar 

  5. Byrd RH, Tapia RA, Zhang Y (1992) An SQP augmented Lagrangian BFGS algorithm for constrained optimization. SIOPT 2:210–241

    Google Scholar 

  6. Byrd RH, Nocedal J, Schnabel B (1994) Representations of quasi-Newton-matrices and their use in limited memory methods. Math. Prog. 63:129–156

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chamberlain RM (1979) Some examples of cycling in variable metric methods for constrained minimization. Math. Prog. 16:378–383

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chamberlain RM, Powell MDJ, Lemarechal C, Petersen HC (1982) The watchdog technique for forcing convergence in algorithms for constrained optimization. Math. Prog. Study 16:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clarke FH (1987) Optimization and nonsmooth analysis, John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conn AR, Sinclair JW Quadratic programming via a non-differentiable penalty function. Univ. of Waterloo Dept. of Combinatorics and Optimization report CORR 75/15

  11. Daniel JW (1973) Stability of definite quadratic programs. Math. Prog. 5:41–53

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dembo RS (1976) A set of geometric programming test problems and their solutions. Math. Prog. 10:192–213

    Google Scholar 

  13. El-Alem MM (1995) Global convergence without the assumption of linear independence for a trust-region algorithm for constrained optimization. J.O.T.A. 87:563–577

    Google Scholar 

  14. Felkel R (1996) An interior point method for large scale QP problems. THD Mathematics Department Report 1850

  15. Fletcher R (1982) A model algorithm for composite nondifferentiable optimization problems. Math. Prog. 17:67–76

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fletcher R (1987) Practical methods of optimization. 2nd ed, Wiley, Chicester-New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fletcher R (1981) Second order correction for nondifferentiable optimization. 85-114 in Lect. Notes on Math. 912, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fletcher R (1984) Al 1 penalty method for nonlinear constraints. In: Boggs PT, Byrd RH, Schnabel RB (eds.) Numerical optimization, SIAM Publications, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  19. Friedlander A, Martinez JM, Santos SA (1994) On the resolution of linearly constrained convex minimization problems. SIOPT 4:331–339

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gill PhE, Murray W (1978) Numerically stable methods for quadratic programming. Math. Prog. 14:349–372

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gill PhE, Murray W, Wright MH (1980) Practical methods of optimization. Acad. Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gill PhE, Murray W, Saunders M, Wright MH (1992) Some theoretical properties of an augmented Lagrangian merit function. In: Pardalos PM (ed.) Advances in optimization and parallel computing, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 101–128

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gill PhE, Hammarling S, Murray W, Saunders M, Wright, MH (1986) Users guide for NPSOL (Version 4.0). Dept. O.R. Stanford Univ. Rep. SOL 86-2

  24. Goldfarb D, Idnani A (1983) A numerically stable dual method for solving strictly convex quadratic programs. Math. Prog. 27:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gould NIM (1991) An algorithm for large scale quadratic programming. I.M.A.J. Numer. Anal. 11:299–323

    Google Scholar 

  26. Himmelblau DM (1972) Applied nonlinear programming. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hock W, Schittkowski K (1981) Test examples for nonlinear programming codes. Lect. Not. in Econ. and Math. Syst. 187, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heinz J, Spellucci P (1994) A successful implementation of the Pantoja-Mayne SQP- method. Optimization Methods and Software 4:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kanzow C (1994) An unconstrained optimization technique for large-scale linearly constrained convex minimization problems. Computing 53:101–117

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lucidi S (1988) New results on a class of exact augmented Lagrangians. J.O.T.A. 58:259–282

    Google Scholar 

  31. Luenberger DG (1984) Introduction to linear and nonlinear programming. 2nd ed, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mayne DQ, Sahba M (1985) An efficient algorithm for solving inequalities. J.O.T.A. 45:407–423

    Google Scholar 

  33. Murty KG (1988) Linear complementarity, linear and nonlinear programming. Heldermann, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nocedal J, Overton M (1985) Projected Hessian updating alogorithms for nonlinearly constrained optimization. SINUM 22:821–850

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nowak I (1988) Ein quadratisches Optimierungsproblem mit Schlupfvariablen für die SQP- Methode zur Lösung des allgemeinen nichtlinearen Optimierungsproblems. Diplomarbeit, TH Dannstadt

  36. Mayne DQ, Pantoja JFA (1991) Exact penalty function algorithm with simple updating of the penalty parameter J.O.T.A. 69:441–467

    Google Scholar 

  37. Panier ER, Tits AL (1991) Avoiding the Maratos effect by means of a nonmonotone line search. I. general constrained problems. SINUM 28:1183–1195

    Google Scholar 

  38. Powell MJD (1978) A fast algorithm for nonlinearly constrained optimization calculations. Lecture Notes on Mathematics 630, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 144–157

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sahba M (1987) Globally convergent algorithm for nonlinearly constrained optimization problems. J.O.T.A. 52:291–309

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schittkowski K (1981) The nonlinear programming method of Wilson, Han and Powell with an augmented Lagrangian type line search function II. An efficient implementation using linear least squares sub-problems. Num. Math. 38:115–127

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schittkowski K (1983) On the convergence of a sequential quadratic programming method with an augmented Lagrangian line search function. Optimization 14:197–216

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schittkowski K (1987) More testexamples for nonlinear programming codes. Lect. Not. in Econ. and Math. Syst. 282, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  43. Spellucci P (1993) Numerische Verfahren der nichtlinearen Optimierung. Birkhäuser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  44. Spellucci P (1993) A SQP method for general nonlinear programs using only equality constrained sub-problems. THD FB4 Preprint 1562, Submitted for publication

  45. Spellucci P (1985) Sequential quadratic programming: Theory, implementation, problems. In: Beckmann MJ, Gaede KW, Ritter K, Schneeweiss H (eds.) Methods of Operation Research 53, Anton Hain, Meisenheim, pp. 183–213

    Google Scholar 

  46. Spellucci P donlp2. Program and users guide available as donlp2.shar from netlib/opt/ donlp2

  47. Tone K (1983) Revision of constraint approximations in the successive QP-method for nonlinear programming problems. Math. Prog. 26:144–152

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spellucci, P. A new technique for inconsistent QP problems in the SQP method. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 47, 355–400 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01198402

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01198402

Key words

Navigation