Skip to main content
Log in

Preserving communication context: Virtual workspace and interpersonal space in Japanese CSCW

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The past decade has seen the development of a perspective holding that technology is socially constructed. This paper examines the social construction of one group of technologies: systems for computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW). It describes the design of CSCW in Japan, with particular attention to the influence of culture on the design process. Two case studies are presented to illustrate the argument that culture is an important factor in technology design, despite commonly held assumptions about the neutrality and objectivity of science and technology. The paper further argues that, by looking at CSCW systems as texts which reflect the context of their production and the society from which they come, we may be better able to understand the transformations that operate when these texts are ‘read’ in the contexts of their implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R. (1981).Creating the Corporate Future. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S.B. & Miller, H.G. (1987). Expanding Market Share: The Role of American Corporations in Technical Assistance,International Journal of Manpower.6. 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon, L. & Schmidt, K. (1991). CSCW: Four Characters in Search of a Context. In Bowers, J. & Benford, S. (eds.)Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnlund, D.C. (1989). Communicative Styles of Japanese and Americans. Images + Realities. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W.E. Hughes, T.P. & Pinch, T.J. (eds.) (1987).The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W.E. & Law, J. (eds.) (1992).Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1983).Le Métier de Sociologue: Préalables Epistémologiques, (4th edn). Mouton, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation,Organizational Science.2(1). 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (1994). Borderline Issues: Social and Material Aspects of Design,Human Computer Interaction.9(1). 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, W.B. (1992). Artifacts and Frames of Meaning: The Cultural Construction of Motion Pictures. In Bijker, W. & Law, J. (eds),Shaping Technology, Building Society. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 175–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. & Pinch, T. (1982).Frames of Meaning: The Social Construction of Extraordinary Science Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlbom, B. & Mathiasson, L. (1993).Computers in Context: The Philosophy and Practice of Systems Design. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deans, C.P. & Ricks, D.A. (1991). MIS Research: A Model for Incorporating the International Dimension,Journal of High Technology Management Review.2(1), 57–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLaet, C. (1992). Des Outils pour un Développement Durable: Plaidoyer pour une Réconfiguration. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Montreal.

  • Erez, M. & Earley, P.C. (1993).Culture, Self-Identity, and Work. New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flichy, P. (1995).L'Innovation Technique. La Découverte, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärtner, J. & Wagner, I. (1994). Systems as Intermediaries: Political Frameworks of Design and Participation, InProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 1994, CPSR, Palo Alto, CA, 37–46.

  • Grudin, J. (1991a). Interactive Systems: Bridging the Gaps Between Developers and Users,Computer.24(4). 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. (1991b). Obstacles to User Involvement in Software Product Development, with Implications for CSCW,International Journal of Man-Machine Studies.34(3), 435–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakken, D. (1994).Cultural Constructions of Computing: Lessons for the Nordic Computing Project. SUNY Institute of Information Policy, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales, M. (1994). Where are Designers? Styles of Design Practice, Objects of Design and Views of Users in Computer Supported Cooperative Work, In Rosenberg, D. & Hutchison, C. (eds).Design Issues in CSCW. Springer, London, 151–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E.T. (1976).Beyond Culture. Doubleday, Garden City, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz, U. (1992).Cultural Complexity. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C. and Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and ControlCSCW (1):69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, L. (1997). Culture in Design: The Case of Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Montreal.

  • Hofstede, G. (1980).Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, H. (1990). Team WorkStation: Towards a Seamless Shared Workspace, InProceedings of CSCW'90, ACM, New York, 13–26.

  • Ishii, H. & Arita, K. (1991). ClearFace: Translucent Multiuser Interface for TeamWorkStation. In Bannon, L., Robinson, M. & Schmidt, K. (eds),ECSCW '91 Proceedings. Kluwer, Amsterdam, 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, H., & Kobayashi, M. (1992). ClearBoard: A Seamless Medium for Shared Drawing and Conversation with Eye Contact. InProceedings CHI '92. ACM, New York, 525–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, H., Kobayashi, M. & Grudin, J. (1993). Integration of Interpersonal Space and Shared Workspace: Clearboard Design and Experiments,ACM Transactions on Information Systems.11(4). 349–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, H., & Miyake, N. (1991). Toward an Open Shared Workspace: Computer Video Fusion Approach of TeamWorkStation,Communications of the ACM.34(12). 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, S. (1986). Modifying Imported Technology by Local Engineers: Hypothesis and Case Study of India,Developing Economies.24. 334–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.H. (1996). The Meaning of ‘Communication Technology’: The Technology-Context Scheme, In Burleson, B.R. (ed.).Communication Yearbook 19. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. & Bijker, W., (1992). Postscript: Technology, Stability and Social Theory, In Bijker, W. & Law, J. (eds).Shaping Technology, Building Society. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 290–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, D. & Wacjman, J. (1985).The Social Shaping of Technology: How the Refrigerator Got its Hum. Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madu, C. (1992).Strategic Planning in Technology Transfer to Less Developed Countries. Quorum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouer, R. & Sugimoto, Y. (1986).Images of Japanese Society: A Study in the Social Construction of Reality. KPI, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada, K., Maeda, F., Ichikawaa, Y. & Matsushita, Y. (1994). Multiparty Videoconferencing at Virtual Social Distance: MAJIC Design. InProceedings of CSCW '94. ACM, New York, 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). Learning from Notes: Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation. InProceedings of CSCW '92. ACM, New York, 362–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. & Gash, D.C. (1994). Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations,ACM Transactions on Information Systems.12(2). 174–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M.S. & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the Use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration, In Steinfeld, C.W. & Fulk, J. (eds).Organizations and Communication Technology. Sage, Newbury Park, 173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, K.S. & Watson, R.T. (1994). National Culture, IS, and Organizational Implications. In Deans, C.P. & Karwan, K.R. (eds)Global Information Systems and Technology: Focus on the Organization and its Functional Area. Idea Group, Harrisburg, PA, 493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. & Shoemaker, F. (1971).Communication of Innovation: A Cross-Cultural Approach. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L. & Griesemer, J.R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, ‘translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39,Social Studies of Science,19. 387–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, E.C. (1987). The Japanese Culture of Organizational Communication, In Thayer, L. (ed.)Organization — Communications: Emerging Perspectives II. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 136–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R.T. & Brancheau, J.C. (1991). Key Issues in Information Systems Management: an International Perspective,Information and Management.20(3). 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1994).Communities of Practice. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1993). Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding it Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology,Science, Technology, & Human Values.18(3). 362–378.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorna Heaton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heaton, L. Preserving communication context: Virtual workspace and interpersonal space in Japanese CSCW. AI & Soc 13, 357–376 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205983

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205983

Keywords

Navigation