Skip to main content
Log in

Stabilization in spite of matched unmodeled dynamics and an equivalent definition of input-to-state stability

  • Published:
Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider nonlinear systems with input-to-output stable (IOS) unmodeled dynamics which are in the “range” of the input. Assuming the nominal system is globally asymptotically stabilizable and a nonlinear small-gain condition is satisfied, we propose a first control law such that all solutions of the perturbed system are bounded and the state of the nominal system is captured by an arbitrarily small neighborhood of the origin. The design of this controller is based on a gain assignment result which allows us to prove our statement via a Small-Gain Theorem [JTP, Theorem 2.1]. However, this control law exhibits a high-gain feature for all values. Since this may be undesirable, in a second stage we propose another controller with different characteristics in this respect. This controller requires morea priori knowledge on the unmodeled dynamics, as it is dynamic and incorporates a signal bounding the unmodeled effects. However, this is only possible by restraining the IOS property into the exp-IOS property. Nevertheless, we show that, in the case of input-to-state stability (ISS)—the output is the state itself-ISS and exp—ISS are in fact equivalent properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. R. Barmish, M. J. Corless, and G. Leitmann, A new class of stabilizing controllers for uncertain dynamical systems,SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization,21 (1983), 246–255.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. M. Boothby,An Introduction to Differentiable Manifold and Riemannian Geometry, second edition, Academic Press, Orlando, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. J. Corless, Control of uncertain nonlinear systems,Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control,115 (1993), 362–372.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. J. Corless and G. Leitmann, Continuous state feedback guaranteeing uniform ultimate boundedness for uncertain dynamic systems,IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,26 (1981), 1139–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Gutman, Uncertain dynamical systems—a Lyapunov min-max approach,IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,24 (1979), 437–443.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Hahn,Stability of Motion, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Isidori,Nonlinear Control Systems, second edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Z.-P. Jiang, Quelques résultats de stabilisation robuste. Application à la commande, Thèse de Docteur en Mathématiques et Automatique, école des Mines de Paris, 1993.

  9. Z. P. Jiang, I. M. Y. Mareels, and J.-B. Pomet, Output feedback global stabilization for a class of nonlinear systems with unmodeled dynamics,European Journal of Control, to appear.

  10. Z.-P. Jiang and L. Praly, Preliminary results about robust Lagrange stability in adaptive nonlinear regulation,International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing,6(4) (1992), 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Z.-P. Jiang and L. Praly, Technical results for the study of robustness of Lagrange stability,System & Control Letters,23 (1994), 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Z.-P. Jiang, A. Teel, and L. Praly, Small-gain theorem for ISS systems and applications,Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems,7 (1994), 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. K. Khalil,Nonlinear Systems, Macmillan, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Krstić and P. Kokotović, On extending the Praly-Jiang-Teel design to systems with nonlinear input unmodelled dynamics, Technical Report CCEC 94-0211, University of California, Santa Barbara, February 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Krstić, J. Sun, and P. Kokotović, Robust control of nonlinear systems with input unmodelled dynamics, Technical Report CCEC 94-0125, University of California, Santa Barbara, January 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Lakshmikantham and S. Leela,Differential and Integral Inequalities: Theory and Applications, Volume 1, Academic Press, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Lin, E. Sontag, and Y. Wang, A smooth converse Lyapunov theorem for robust stability,SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization,34(1) (1996), 124–160.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. Praly, Almost exact modelling assumption in adaptive linear control,International Journal of Control,51(3) (1990), 643–668.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Qu, Model reference robust control of SISO systems with significant unmodelled dynamics,Proceedings of the American Control Conference, June 1993, pp. 255–259.

  20. Z. Qu, Model reference robust control of weakly non-minimum phase systems,Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1993, pp. 996–1000.

  21. A. Saberi and H. K. Khalil, Quadratic-type Lyapunov functions for singularly perturbed systems,IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,29 (1984), 542–550.

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. D. Sontag, A “universal” construction of Artstein's theorem on nonlinear stabilization,Systems & Control Letters,13 (1989), 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. D. Sontag, Smooth stabilization implies coprime factorization,IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control,34 (1989), 435–443.

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. D. Sontag and Y. Wang, On characterizations of the input-to-state stability property,Systems & Control Letters,24 (1995), 351–359.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Yuan Wang was supported in part by NSF Grant DMS-9403924 and by a scholarship from Université Lyon I, France.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Praly, L., Wang, Y. Stabilization in spite of matched unmodeled dynamics and an equivalent definition of input-to-state stability. Math. Control Signal Systems 9, 1–33 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01211516

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01211516

Key words

Navigation