Skip to main content
Log in

Rational representations of behaviors: Interconnectability and stabilizability

  • Published:
Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of representation and stability properties of dynamical systems whose signals are assumed to be square summable sequences. Systems are defined as families of trajectories with no more structure than linearity and shift invariance. We depart from the usual input-output and operator theoretic setting and view relationships among system variables as a more general starting point for the study of dynamical systems. Parametrizations of two model classes are derived in terms of analytic functions which define kernel and image representations of dynamical systems. It is shown how state space models are derived from these representations. Uniqueness and minimality of these representations are completely characterized. Elementary properties like stabilizability, regularity, and interconnectability of dynamical systems are introduced and characterized in this set theoretic framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Chen and B. Francis,Optimal Sampled-Data Control Systems, Communications and Control Engineering Series, Springer-Verlag, London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Fagnani and J. C. Willems, Controllability of ℓ2 Systems,SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization,30(5) (1992), 1101–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. A. Francis,A Course in H Control Theory, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Vol. 88, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. A. Fuhrmann, Algebraic System Theory: an Analyst's Point of View,Journal of the Franklin Institute,301 (1976), 521–540.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. A. Fuhrmann,Linear Systems and Operators in Hilbert Space, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. T. Georgiou and M. C. Smith, Graphs, Causality, and Stabilizability: Linear, Shift-Invariant Systems on L2[0, ∞),Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems,6 (1994), 195–223.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Green and D. J. N. Limebeer,Linear Robust Control, Information and System Sciences Series, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Heij,Deterministic Identification of Dynamical Systems, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 127, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Kuijper, Why Do Stabilizing Controllers Stabilize?,Automatica 31 (1995), 621–625.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Kuijper and J. M. Schumacher, Realization of Autoregressive Equations in Pencil and Descriptor Form,SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization,28(5) 1990, 1162–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. J. Ober and J. A. Sefton, Stability of Control Systems and Graphs of Linear Systems,Systems and Control Letters,17 (1991), 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Roorda, Global Total Least Squares: a Method for the Construction of Open Approximate Models from Vector Time Series, Ph.D. thesis, Tinbergen Institute Research Series, No. 88, Rotterdam, 1995.

  13. M. Rosenblum and J. Rovnyak,Hardy Spaces and Operator Theory, Oxford University Press, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. A. Sefton and R. J. Ober, On the Gap Metric and Coprime Factor Perturbations,Automatica,19 (1993), 723–734.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. L. Trentelman and J. C. Willems, ℋ∞ Control in a Behavioral Context, submitted toIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1996.

  16. F. Treves,Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels, Academic Press, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Weiland, A. A. Stoorvogel, and B. de Jager. A Behavioral Approach to the ℋ∞ Optimal Control Problem, accepted for publication inSystems and Control Letters, 1997.

  18. J. C. Willems, Input-Output and State-Space Representations of Finite-Dimensional Linear Time-Invariant Systems,Linear Algebra and its Applications,50 (1983), 581–608.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. C. Willems, From Time Series to Linear Systems, Part I: Finite Dimensional Linear Time Invariant Systems; Part II: Exact Modeling,Automatica,22 (1986), 561–580, 675–694.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. C. Willems, From Time Series to Linear Systems, Part III: Approximate Modelling,Automatica,23 (1987), 87–115.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. C. Willems, Paradigms and Puzzles in the Theory of Dynamical Systems,IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,36 (1991), 259–294.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. C. Willems, Feedback in a Behavioral Setting, inSystems, Models and Feedback: Theory and Applications (eds. A. Isidori and T. J. Tarn), pp. 179–191, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. C. Willems, On Interconnections, Control, and Feedback,IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,42 (1997), 326–339.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Part of this research has been made possible by a grant from the European Community for the Systems Identification and Modeling Network (SIMONET).

This research has been made possible by a fellowship of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences and Arts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiland, S., Stoorvogel, A. Rational representations of behaviors: Interconnectability and stabilizability. Math. Control Signal Systems 10, 125–164 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01213383

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01213383

Key words

Navigation