Abstract
We study the shape of a finite point set in IR2, where the points are not bound to a regular grid like ℤ2. The shape of a connected point set in IR2 is captured by its boundary. For a finite point set the boundary is a directed graph that connects points identified as boundary points. We argue that to serve as a proper boundary definition the directed graph should regulate scale, be minimal, have an increasing interior and be consistent with the boundary definition of connected objects.
We propose to use the directed variant of theα-shape as defined by Edelsbrunner et al (1983), which we call theα-graph. Theα-graph is based on a generalization of the convex hull.
The computational aspects of theα-graph have been extensively studied, but little attention has been paid to the potential use of theα-graph as a shape descriptor or a boundary definition. In this paper we prove that theα-graph satisfies the aforementioned criteria. We also prove a relation between theα-graph and the opening scale space from mathematical morphology. In fact, theα-hull provides a generalization of this scale space.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Asada and M. Brady, “The curvature primal sketch,”IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. vol. PAMI-8, pp. 2–14, 1986.
M. Chen and P. Yan, “A multiscaling approach based on morphological filtering,”IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. PAMI-11, pp. 694–700, 1989.
H. Edlesbrunner,Algorithms in Combinatorial Geometry Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1987.
H. Edelsbrunner, D.G. Kirkpatrick, and R. Seidel, “On the shape of a set of points in the plane,”IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. IT-29, pp. 551–559, 1983.
R.M. Haralick, S.R. Sternberg, and X. Zhuang, “Image analysis using mathematical morphology,”IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. PAMI-9, pp. 532–550, 1987.
D.G. Kirkpatrick and J.D. Radke, “A framework for computational morphology,” inComputational Geometry, G.T. Toussaint, ed.,Machine Intelligence and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 217–248.
J.J. Koenderink, “The structure of images,”Biol. Cybernet. vol. 50, pp. 363–370, 1984.
P. Maragos, “Tutorial on advances in morphological image processing and analysis,”Opt. Eng., vol. 26, pp. 623–632, 1987.
V. Medek, “On the boundary of a finite set of points in the plane,”Comput. Graph. and Image Process, vol. 15, pp. 93–99, 1981.
F. Mokhtarian and A. Mackworth, “Scale-based description and recognition of planar curves and two-dimensional shapes,”IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. PAMI-8, pp. 34–43, 1986.
F.P. Preparata and M.I. Shamos,Computational Geometry, an Introduction, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1985.
J.D. Radke, “On the shape of a set of points,” inComputational Morphology, G.T. Toussaint, ed.,Machine Intelligence and Pattern Recognition vol. 6, North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 229–260.
C. Ronse, “A Bibliography on digital and computational convexity,”IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. PAMI-11, pp. 181–190, 1989.
J. Serra,Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 1982.
A.W.M. Smeulders and M. Worring, “Accurate measurement of shape at low resolution,” inPattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, L.N. Kanal and E.S. Gelsema, eds.Machine Intelligence and Pattern Recognition, vol. 7, North-Holland: Amsterdam: 1988, pp. 91–102.
P.W. Verbeeck and F.C.A. Groen, “Convex pseudo-hull algorithm for two and more dimensions,” inProc. of the 2nd Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, Helsinki, Finland, 1981, pp. 29–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs through SPIN grants “3D Computer Vision” and “3D Image Analysis.”
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Worring, M., Smeulders, A.W.M. Shape of an arbitrary finite point set in IR2 . J Math Imaging Vis 4, 151–170 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01249894
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01249894