Skip to main content
Log in

Orthogonal and conjugate basis methods for solving equality constrained minimization problems

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with methods for choosing search directions in the iterative solution of constrained minimization problems. The popular technique of calculating orthogonal components of the search direction (i.e., tangential and normal to the constraints) is discussed and contrasted with the idea of constructing the search direction from two moves which are conjugate with respect to the Hessian of the Lagrangian function. Minimization algorithms which use search directions obtained by these two approaches are described, and their local convergence properties are studied. This analysis, coupled with some numerical results, suggests that the benefits of building steps from conjugate components are well deserving of further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.H. Bartels, G.H. Golub, and M.A. Saunders, “Numerical techniques in mathematical programming,” inNonlinear Programming, Academic Press: New York, NY, 1970, 123–176.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.A. Brown, “Optimization methods involving the solution of ordinary differential equations,” Ph.D. thesis, Hatfield Polytechnic, 1986.

  3. R.H. Byrd, “An example of irregular convergence in some constrained methods that use the projected Hessian,”Math. Prog. 32 (1988), 232–237.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.H. Byrd, “On the convergence of constrained optimization methods with accurate Hessian information on a subspace,”SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 27 (1990), 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.H. Byrd, and J. Nocedal, “An analysis of reduced Hessian methods for constrained optimization,”Math. Prog. 49 (1990), 285–323.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.H. Byrd, R.A. Tapia, and Y. Zhang, “An SQP augmented Lagragian BFGS algorithm for constrained optimization,”SIAM J. Optimization 2 (1992), 210–241.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T.F. Coleman, and A.R. Conn, “Nonlinear programming via an exact penalty function: asymptotic analysis,”Math. Prog. 24 (1982), 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T.F. Coleman, and A.R. Conn, “Nonlinear programming via an exact penalty function: global analysis,”Math. Prog. 24 (1982), 137–161.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T.F. Coleman, and A.R. Conn, “On the local convergence of a quasi-Newton method for the nonlinear programming problem,”SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21 (1984), 755–769.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L.C.W. Dixon, “Conjugate bases for constrained optimization,” Numerical Optimisation Centre Technical Report 181, Hatfield Polytechnic, 1987.

  11. R. Fletcher,Practical Methods of Optimization, John Wiley: New York, NY, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.E. Gill, W. Murray, and M.H. Wright,Practical Optimization, Academic Press: New York, NY, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Goldfarb, and A. Idnani, “A numerically stable dual method for solving strictly convex quadratic programs,”Math. Prog. 27 (1983), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.P. Han, “A globally convergent method for nonlinear programming,”J. Optimization Theory and Appl.,22 (1977), 297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. Hock, and K. Schittkowski,Test Examples for Nonlinear Programming Codes, Springer-Verlag, 1981.

  16. T.T. Nguyen, “Conjugate basis methods for constrained optimization,” Ph.D. Thesis, Hatfield Polytechnic, 1989.

  17. M.J.D. Powell, “A fast algorithm for nonlinearly constrained optimization calculations,” in Numerical Analysis, Dundee 1977, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 630, Springer-Verlag, 1978.

  18. M.J.D. Powell, “The convergence of variable metric methods for nonlinearly constrained optimization calculations,” inNonlinear Programming 3, Academic Press: New York, NY, 1978, 27–63.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M.J.D. Powell, “On the quadratic programming algorithm of Goldfarb and Idnani,”Mathematical Programming Study 25, North-Holland, 1985, 46–61.

  20. M.J.D. Powell, “A tolerant algorithm for linearly constrained optimization calculations,”Math. Prog. 45 (1989), 547–566.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.A. Tapia, “On secant updates for use in general constrained optimization,”Math. of Comp. (1988), 181–202.

  22. R.B. Wilson, “A simplicial algorithm for concave programming,” Ph.D. Thesis, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1963.

  23. R.S. Womersley, and R. Fletcher, “An algorithm for composite nonsmooth optimization problems,”J. Optimization Theory and Appl. 48 (1986), 493–523.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartholomew-Biggs, M.C., Nguyen, T.T. Orthogonal and conjugate basis methods for solving equality constrained minimization problems. Comput Optim Applic 2, 171–200 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01299155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01299155

Keywords

Navigation