Skip to main content
Log in

From toys to brain: Virtual reality applications in neuroscience

  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While many virtual reality (VR) applications have emerged in the areas of entertainment, education, military training, physical rehabilitation, and medicine, only recently have some research projects begun to test the possibility of using virtual environments (VEs) for research in neuroscience, neurosurgery and for the study and rehabilitation of human cognitive and functional activities. Virtual reality technology could have a strong impact on neuroscience. The key characteristic of VEs is the high level of control of the interaction with the tool without the constraints usually found in computer systems. VEs are highly flexible and programmable. They enable the therapist to present a wide variety of controlled stimuli and to measure and monitor a wide variety of responses made by the user. However, at this stage, a number of obstacles exist which have impeded the development of active research. These obstacles include problems with acquiring funding for an almost untested new treatment modality, the lack of reference standards, the non-interoperability of the VR systems and, last but not least, the relative lack of familiarity with the technology on the part of researchers in these fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bloom FE, Fischer BA, Landis SC, Roberts JL, Squire LR, Zigmond MJ. Fundamentals of neuroscience. In: Fundamental neuroscience. Zigmond MJ, Bloom FE, Landis SC, Roberts JL, Squire LR eds. New York: Academic Press, 1998; 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  2. Merril JR. Using emerging technologies such as virtual reality and the World Wide Web to contribute to a richer understanding of the brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1997; 820:229–233

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lester DS, Felder CC, Lewis EN. Imaging brain structure and function: emerging technologies in the neurosciences. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kaltenborn KF, Rienhoff O. Virtual reality in medicine. Methods of Information in medicine 1993; 32:407–417

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weghorst S. Virtual reality in medicine [editorial]. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 1994; 6:277–279

    Google Scholar 

  6. Satava RM. Medical applications of virtual reality. Journal of Medical Systems 1995; 19:275–280

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ahmed M, Meech JF, Timoney A. Virtual reality in medicine. British Journal of Urology 1997; 80(Suppl 3):46–52

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moline J. Virtual reality in health care: a survey. In: Virtual reality in neuro-psycho-physiology. Riva G ed. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1997; pp 3–34

    Google Scholar 

  9. Satava RM. Virtual reality and telepresence for military medicine. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 1997; 26:118–120

    Google Scholar 

  10. Riva G. Virtual reality in neuro-psycho-physiology: Cognitive, clinical and methodological issues in assessment and rehabilitation. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  11. Riva G, Wiederhold B, Molinari E. Virtual environments in clinical psychology and neuroscience: Methods and techniques in advanced patient-therapist interaction. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  12. Riva G. Virtual environments in neuroscience. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 1998; 2:275–281

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rizzo AA, Buckwalter JG. Virtual reality and cognitive assessment and rehabilitation: the state of the art. In: Virtual reality in neuro-psychophysiology. Riva G ed. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1997; 123–146

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pugnetti L, Mendozzi L, Motta A, Cattaneo A, Barbieri E, Brancotti A. Evaluation and retraining of adults' cognitive impairment: which role for virtual reality technology? Computers in Biology and Medicine 1995; 25:213–227

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pugnetti L, Mendozzi L, Barberi E, Rose FD, Attree EA. Nervous system correlates of virtual reality experience. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technology, 1996

  16. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  17. Riva G, Galimberti C. Interbrain frame: interaction and cognition in computer-mediated communication. CyberPsychology & Behavior 1998; 1:295–310

    Google Scholar 

  18. Riva G. From technology to communication: psychosocial issues in developing virtual environments. Journal of Virual Languages and Computing 1999; (in press)

  19. Glantz K, Durlach NI, Barnett RC, Aviles WA. Virtual reality (VR) for psychotherapy: from the physical to the social environment. Psychotherapy 1996: 33:464–473

    Google Scholar 

  20. Riva G. Virtual reality in psychological assessment: The Body Image Virtual Reality Scale. CyberPsychology & Behavior 1998; 1:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  21. Riva G, Mantovani G. The ergonomics of virtual reality: human factors in developing clinical-oriented virtual environments. In: Medicine meets virtual reality. The convergence of physical and informational technologies: options for a new era in healthcare. Westwood JD, Hoffman HH, Robb RA, Stredney D eds. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1999; 278–284

    Google Scholar 

  22. A report of the US National Advisory Mental Health Council. NIH Publication 95-3682. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1995

  23. Mendozzi L, Motta A, Barbieri E, Alpini D, Pugnetti L. The application of virtual reality to document coping deficits after a stroke: report of a case. CyberPsychology & Behavior 1998; 1:79–91

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kuhlen T, Kraiss KF, Szymanski A, Dohle C, Hefter H, Freund HJ. Virtual holography in diagnosis and therapy of sensorimotor disturbances. In: Health care in the information age. Sieburg H, Weghorst S, Morgan K eds. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1996; 184–193

    Google Scholar 

  25. Attree EA, Brooks BM, Rose FD, Andrews TK, Leadbetter AG, Clifford BR. Memory processes and virtual environments: I can't remember how I got there. Implications for people with disabilities. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technology, 1996

  26. Glisky EL. Computer-assisted instruction for patients with traumatic brain injury: Teaching of domainspecific knowledge. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1992; 7:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rose FD, Attree EA, Brooks BM. Virtual Environments in neuropsychological assessment and rehabilitation. In: Virtual reality in neuro-psycho-physiology. Riva G. ed. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1997; 147–156

    Google Scholar 

  28. Prothero JD. The treatment of akinesia using virtual images. Internal report. Seattle: Human Interface Technology Laboratory, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  29. Weghorst SJ, Prothero JD, Furness TA, III, Anson D, Reiss T. Virtual images in the treatment of Parkinson's disease akinesia. In: Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II, 1994

  30. Riva G, Bolzoni M, Carella F et al., Virtual reality environments for psycho-neuro-physiological assessment and rehabilitation. In: Medicine meets virtual reality: global healthcare grid. Morgan KS, Weghorst SJ, Hoffman HM, Stredney D eds. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1997; 34–45

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rovetta A, Lorini F, Canina MR. Virtual reality in the assessment of neuromotor diseases: measurement of time response in real and virtual environments. In: Virtual reality in neuro-psycho-physiology. Riva G. ed. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1997; 165–184

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rovetta A, Lorini F, Canina MR. A new project for rehabilitation and psychomotor disease analysis with virtual reality support. In: Medicine meets virtual reality. Westwood JD, Hoffman HM, Stredney D, Weghorst SJ eds. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1999; 165–184

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rushton SK, Coles KL, Wann JP. Virtual reality technology in the assessment and rehabilitation of unilateral neglect. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technology, 1996

  34. Wann JP, Rushton SK, Smyth M, Jones D. Rehabilitative environments for attention and movement disorders. Communications of the ACM 1997; 40:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wann JP, Rushton SK, Smyth M, Jones D. Virtual reality for the rehabilitation of disorders of attention and movement. In: Virtual reality in neuro-psychophysiology. Riva G. ed. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1997; 157–164

    Google Scholar 

  36. Riva G, Melis L. Virtual reality for the treatment of body image disturbances. In: Virtual reality in neuropsycho-physiology: Cognitive, clinical and methodological issues in assessment and rehabilitation. Riva G ed. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1997; 95–111

    Google Scholar 

  37. Riva G. The virtual environment for body-image modification (VEBIM): development and preliminary evaluation. Presence 1997; 6:106–117

    Google Scholar 

  38. Riva G, Melis L, Bolzoni M. Treating body image disturbances. Communications of the ACM 1997; 40:69–71

    Google Scholar 

  39. Riva G. Modifications of body image induced by virtual reality. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1998; 86:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  40. Riva G. Virtual environment for body-image modification: Virtual reality system for the treatment of body image disturbances. Computers in Human Behavior 1998; 14:477–490

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sawaya R, Rambo WM Jr, Hammoud MA, Ligon BL. Advances in surgery for brain tumors. Neurological Clinics 1995; 13:757–771

    Google Scholar 

  42. Apuzzo ML. The Richard C. Schneider Lecture. New dimensions of neurosurgery in the realm of high technology: possibilities, practicalities, realities. Neurosurgery 1996; 38:625–637; (discussion 637–629)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rosenfeld JV. Minimally invasive neurosurgery. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 1996; 66:553–559

    Google Scholar 

  44. Black PM. Hormones, radiosurgery and virtual reality: new aspects of meningioma management. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 1997; 24:302–306

    Google Scholar 

  45. Giorgi C, Pluchino F, Luzzara M, Ongania E, Casolino DS. A computer-assisted toolholder to guide surgery in stereotactic space. Acta Neurochirurgica. Supplementum (Wien) 1994; 61:43–45

    Google Scholar 

  46. Giorgi C, Luzzara M, Casolino DS, Ongania E. A computer-controlled stereotactic arm: virtual reality in neurosurgical procedures. Acta Neurochirurgica. Supplementum (Wien) 1993; 58:75–76

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gleason PL, Kikinis R, Altobelli D et al.. Video registration virtual reality for nonlinkage stereotactic surgery. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 1994; 63:139–143

    Google Scholar 

  48. McGregor JM. Enhancing neurosurgical endoscopy with the use of virtual reality headgear. Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery 1997; 40:47–49

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ghahramani Z, Wolpert DM. Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning. Nature 1997; 386:392–395

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pekel M, Lappe M, Bremmer F, Thiele A, Hoffmann KP. Neuronal responses in the motion pathway of the macaque monkey to natural optic flow stimuli. Neuroreport 1996; 7:884–888

    Google Scholar 

  51. Accornero N, Capozza M, Rinalduzzi S, Manfredi GW. Clinical multisegmental posturography: age-related changes in stance control. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1997; 105:213–219

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Riva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riva, G. From toys to brain: Virtual reality applications in neuroscience. Virtual Reality 3, 259–266 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01408706

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01408706

Keywords

Navigation