Abstract
When a woman diagnosed as having breast cancer has a tumour removed, it is important to try and predict whether she is likely to relapse within, say, the next three years. In this paper, the performance of a neural network classifier trained on a number of prognostic indicators is shown to be better than that of the clinical experts working with the same information. To obtain meaningful statistics with the relatively small dataset available, the network is trained using a modified form of the leave-one-out method. A procedure is also introduced for investigating how much independentinformation each input parameter contributes. This shows that, in this type of retrospective study, the type of therapy given to the woman does not significantly affect the network's prediction of whether or not she will relapse within three years. Finally, since this problem, in common with many other medical problems, is plagued by a shortage of data, the final section of the paper reports on an investigation of whether or not multi-centre databases might be feasible.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McGuire WL, Tandon AT, Allred DC, Chamness GC, Clark GM. How to use prognostic factors in axillary node-negative breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 1006–1015
Sammon JW. A nonlinear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Trans Comput 1969; 18: 401–409
Duda RO, Hart PE. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. John Wiley, New York, 1973
Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 1986; 323: 533–536
Bishop CM. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995
Jacobs RA. Methods for Combining Experts' Probability Assessments. Neural Computation 1995; 7: 867–888
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tarassenko, L., Whitehouse, R., Gasparini, G. et al. Neural network prediction of relapse in breast cancer patients. Neural Comput & Applic 4, 105–113 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01413746
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01413746